Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

What would you choose, R22 or 300CBi if a similar price?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

What would you choose, R22 or 300CBi if a similar price?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2012, 14:33
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 78
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you choose, R22 or 300CBi if a similar price


The Robsinson should have been classified as an ultra-light or an overgrown model perhaps. It is not a real helicopter.
Anthony Supplebottom is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 16:29
  #42 (permalink)  
RMK
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before starting my PPL training, I did a trial flight in both the 300 & R22. My feedback: I hate the 300 and only ever flew in it twice. Granted the Robinson design does not summon images of Italian designers showing their craftwork, but the 300 is the ugliest helicopter made. I would be embarrassed to offer someone their first helicopter flight and they arrive to see the seemingly unfinished "bubble & sticks"contraption that is the 300.

After my PPL, I near solely fly a R44 RavenII or ClipperII, but still get in the odd R22 flight. Fly in something that will make you a better pilot (I’d even say learn in a R22 in preference to a R44 to build your skills).

After receiving your license, there are many more R22/R44 available for SFH globally.

On a side note, before my first intro lesson and not knowing anything about either helicopter, I’m on the phone with the school and he says you can fly the R22 or300 today - your choice. I ask “what’s your preference?” He replied “they’re both good; however if you were to crash one, you’d prefer to be in the 300; don’t crash and you’ll have more fun flying the R22”
RMK is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 17:48
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
RMK

So what do you hate about a 300, just its looks ?( Beauty is in the eye of the beholder granted ) Would suggest you be a bit more worldly wise before criticising a machine when you obviously know f all about them.
Please do the following experiment in your wonderfull 22, trim the cylic up in the hover and let go of it( for 10 seconds) see what happens,then try in a 300. Let me know the result
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 18:03
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RMK,

I definitely don't find the 269/300s 'ugly'.

On the contrary, like the Bell 47, there's a pure, functional, design quality that's really quite attractive, IMO.

Everything is there for a puropse, with just the right blend of design sophistication, engineering integrity, lightness and accessibility. The 'C' models are the best though for performance and handling.



It's a 'classic'.
FLY 7 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 18:15
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Under my coconut tree
Posts: 650
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Supplebottom,
I like the cut of your jib sir...
griffothefog is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 18:54
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Hughes500 - recommend he attempt that experiment with the 300 first, then the R22 second, for obvious reasons!
krypton_john is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 19:08
  #47 (permalink)  
RMK
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I could take the bonnet, quarter panels and boot lid off of my car and say it’s functional beauty – but it just looks better if I leave the bodywork in place.

To its owner this dog is surely handsome, a fine example of the breed & a loyal companion


handsome chap!

Just winding you guys up; you do it all the time with the R44/R22. I’ll be back tomorrow to say derogatory things about the Wessex.
RMK is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2012, 19:59
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,849
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
It was even uglier before they cut it in half!

RVDT is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 01:28
  #49 (permalink)  
RotorHead
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,054
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I could take the bonnet, quarter panels and boot lid off of my car and say it’s functional beauty – but it just looks better if I leave the bodywork in place.
Yes obviously. On a car all the Driver / Mechanic has to do is lift the Bonnet to see the Engine. On the Schweizer from a Student / Pilot / Engineer point of view the open Engine / Mast area leaves for a better learning experience and understanding of how the Aircraft runs and operates when your up in the air and also allows for a good thorough Pre-Flight Inspection especially when testing the Clutch.
206Fan is online now  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 08:25
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
Krypton

Good point there, or perhaps I was being serious for obvious reasons !
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 09:19
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jet photo

RVDT,

that is an excellent photograph. Never seen one of those with its clothes off, interesting to see the complexity of the flight controls and simplicity of construction. Also the structural panel over the donk to keep everything on the level I suppose. six pots? what sort?

A very interesting photo for the background even though a file photo; do you have any idea where? a private collection or public museum, looks like a canadian version of the F86, big stuipid guess there to the left and a bigger more stupid guess perhaps to the right is that an F80 or Mig17.

cheers tet
topendtorque is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 11:23
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
TET, RVDT's image was taken at Chino in California, the craft is a McCulloch MC4 (can't confirm the craft in the background unfortunately) but you can read more about the MC4 here.
Savoia is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.