Guardian Newspaper Helicopter Article
Guest
Posts: n/a
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: UK
For once not a bad article 
Shame journos still don't check facts before printing them though
Fast aren't a Robinson dealership. Service centre (courtesy of what used to be Eastern Atlantics engineering expertise
) according to Franks website. Also thought that they'd only bought 10 R44's for onward sale last year (before the annual Robinson price rises). Not a bad number to shift, but just shows you cannot trust everything (well much in this case
) that an MD tells you 


Would also have been good if the journo had investigated a little further about Battersea heliport. Slot system yes, but initially very poorly managed
, price increases
and what about the current total lack of flexibility regarding parking. Won't that make Londons only heliport a shining example through the summer months, especially on 'event' days
Oh but Von Esson does own some nice hotels
Shame journos still don't check facts before printing them though

Fast aren't a Robinson dealership. Service centre (courtesy of what used to be Eastern Atlantics engineering expertise
) that an MD tells you 


Would also have been good if the journo had investigated a little further about Battersea heliport. Slot system yes, but initially very poorly managed
, price increases
and what about the current total lack of flexibility regarding parking. Won't that make Londons only heliport a shining example through the summer months, especially on 'event' days
Oh but Von Esson does own some nice hotels

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Warwick
Seems relatively well balanced to me; a few minor errors - but then the chap is a journo afterall.
Not sure how the stereo typical reader of The Guardian will react to that article though, not a single mention of carbon footprint (although there was a token mention of environment) I suppose...
... or perhaps I have a twisted image of the stereotypical Guardian reader?
(Oh and before we all start, I read it regularly too - but then again I also read The Mail!).
Not sure how the stereo typical reader of The Guardian will react to that article though, not a single mention of carbon footprint (although there was a token mention of environment) I suppose...
... or perhaps I have a twisted image of the stereotypical Guardian reader?
(Oh and before we all start, I read it regularly too - but then again I also read The Mail!).
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 1
From: UK
Pardon me for being a pedant, but what is a "helcopter"? The 212 is certainly hellishly noisy but I always assumed that I was flying a helicopter? Don't Guardian journos emply proof readers?
with fraternal greetings,
ambi
with fraternal greetings,
ambi
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Upon the my oh my
I read the "Daily Mail" the other week when it ran a story on the BA 777 crash - the writer seemed to imply the commanders decision to leave the handling pilot flying the plane while he hit the checklists was odd. Haven't bought it since.



Hovering AND talking

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 1
From: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Don't Guardian journos emply proof readers?
It's not called The Grauniad for nowt y'know!
Cheers
Whirls
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 2
From: UK
The Daily Mail in its purple prose surrounding the 777 accident also explained to readers that Instrument Landing Systems were comprised "...of a laser shone into the sky...." Great stuff, scary that these people are the moderrn day equivalent of the thought police.







