Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell Ceasing Production of 206, 427,430 and 210.

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell Ceasing Production of 206, 427,430 and 210.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jan 2008, 13:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"That's easy - T shirts, ball caps and coffee mugs."
This strategy seems to have worked very well for Harley Davidson. Who knows?
EN48 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 18:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 43 S
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you'll find H-D's success goes a bit deeper than that.....

Nothing to do with marketing a product people want at a price they'll pay?

But hey, it'll be sad if Bell goes the way of the dinasaurs
aldee is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 19:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I think you'll find H-D's success goes a bit deeper than that.....

Nothing to do with marketing a product people want at a price they'll pay?"
Not much deeper. Their bikes are mostly 1938 technology chrome plated and polished. I was told that a very significant fraction of HD revenue comes from the sale of other than motorcycles - hats, jackets, "accessories" , etc.

I grant that HD are marketing masters - making people want bikes that were eclipsed in quality and performance by the rice burners and euro bikes decades ago (IMHO of course). Go figure!

I dont think that Bell will be going away soon. If you havent tried the 407, give it a whirl - a most impressive helicopter.
EN48 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 22:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Best State, US
Age: 64
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Equal looks

The 407 is a gorgeous ship but the 206 is equally as gorgeous and much more affordable and convienient to hangar. Each ship has it's own purpose and each does it well. They are not meant to be apples to apples comparable. Bell is dropping the ball again (like with the 47) and exiting what could be a very lucrative market for them. Too bad they can't see that . Good luck in Texas and say hello to Master Roger @ LEB for me, thanks.
Helomaniac is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 09:38
  #25 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm more than a bit out of touch these days but what about Augusta, will they continue with the AB206 or was that scrubbed long ago?

My memories of the 206 are that is was the only aircraft I flew that had a full blooded engine failure in flight and a complete failure of the left front wind screen in flight, otherwise it was nice to fly!!
parabellum is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 11:27
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"the 206 is equally as gorgeous and much more affordable and convienient to hangar. "
No doubt the 206 is a classic that will have a well deserved high place in helicopter history. It seems however, that the market has spoken, with production numbers now down to around 15-20 units annually IIRC. Perhaps the design could be refreshed to give it new life - a little more payload and cabin room, a little more power, composite rotor system, but that's pretty much the 407, which seems to be in considerably higher demand. When I hear the word "helicopter" the 206 is the image that comes to mind, and I am sure its the same for many others.
EN48 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 19:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: stateside
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah and the other thing about Bell quitting 206 production is the resale value of existing JetRangers will now go through the roof!
Who's going to get the last one ever??
What happened to the 427, is that the shortest production run ever for bell??
As for the 430, big deal but the 210 looked like a good ship and a realistic way to get your ex miltary UH-1 certified, no dodgy TC, just a bit expensive..which is not the reason people buy UH-1s.
The Astars Ok but not with the Turbomeca engine, crap support and costs a fortune for modules and FCUs ( if you can get them ).
Good to hear they are sticking with the 412, good ship that, and bring back the 212 i say!

You wait.. those tiny, delicate Army EC145s will last about five minutes on the job then it will be back to the 412s as it should have been from the start.......
TukTuk BoomBoom is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 20:56
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 206 will probably soldier on for another 40 years, becoming the helicopter equivalent of the DC-3. Probably plenty of parts out there, and enough airframes to make a business out of making parts if necessary.
EN48 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 21:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 158
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
TukTuk BoomBoom,

427 production run of something around 70 airframes is still almost double the 230's run of less than 40. And the 210 will probably be the shortest of all with 2 delivered so far. A far cry from the 10,000+ Hueys back in the 60s and 70s.

Tango
Tango and Cash is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 23:55
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West of zero
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tottigol,

that’s got to be the first time in years that “helicopters” and “introducing a lot of new technology” have been used in a sentence describing Bell!

As for the 412, after 1400 hours in it I’m more convinced than ever that it’s a perfect example of what’s wrong with Bell – a modification of a modification of a … of a 50’s design that was great back then. Exactly what is to be expected when one puts all one’s (R&D) eggs in one (tiltrotor) basket, chasing the big military bucks.

If Agusta and Eurocopter ever get their customer support sorted (some hopes, I agree) then Bell will go out of the civilian helicopter business. Damn shame, but there it is.
Buitenzorg is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 20:36
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still producing the 206L4?

When I read that article is only says that 206B3 production is ceasing. It doesn't mention the L4, though one of you may have additional info on that model.
skiddriver is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 21:18
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Great White North
Posts: 171
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Bell 206L-4 is not one of the models that is being "retired".
Encyclo is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 22:14
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customer service

Having owned and loved several 206's this is a sad day, especially when it comes to getting parts. Although not the perfect machine by today’s standards they were a dream in terms of support.

If only Eurocopter would learn from Bell, we run four AS355's and Eurocopter have yet to grasp what AOG means in terms of support...
Twin-star is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2008, 18:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why Bell is dropping the 206

This is from the March/April 2008 print edition of Helicopters magazine at p. 18. The article is entitled Shattering Records in Houston HAI Convention 2008:

Mike Blake, VP of customer solutions, said the Jetranger was dropped largely because the company didn't need two entry-level helicopters and the L4 would fill the gaps. Frank Robinson's hotly anticipated turbine-powered R66 and other competitors have slashed 206 series sales for years and it is time to trim the market losers.
rotornut is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2008, 18:38
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
I wonder if Eagle getting certification for their conversion of the 212 from a twin to a single with a T53 has caused the 210 to be dropped. Anybody know what one of the converted 212's costs?
ericferret is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.