Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Tail Rotor Power Consumption

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Tail Rotor Power Consumption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2008, 01:13
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 1,098
Received 83 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by NickLappos
The pursuit of symmetry that is his mantra seems to be sparked by some internal asymmetry, frankly! Even Charlie Kaman, the inventor, dumped the syncropter configuration that Dave is wedded to, Dave has never tried to find out why.
So why did he dump the syncropter? It appears they put the Seasprite up in front, at least in terms of the picture coverage. It also seems they build blackhawk cabins:
http://www.kamanaero.com/images/PDFs...20Sikorsky.pdf

The K-max is still there, looks like it can lift a decent amount but you could just about catch it with a S300CBi.

-- IFMU
IFMU is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 01:49
  #62 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IFMU,

About a year ago Kaman mentioned that they would not be producing any more K_MAX's and that they were trying to sell the two that they were leasing out; as I recall.

They plan to stay strongly in the helicopter industry, but as a component manufacturer and not as a complete helicopter manufacturer.

Charles Kaman's failing health may have something to do with this.

Dave
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 02:52
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Beyond the black stump!
Posts: 1,419
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
The end of the K-Max has been driven by the horrifying accident rate.

http://www.markusherzig.com/kmax/

I'll let you interpret the data yourself!
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 12:21
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Africa
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Though most of the Kmax isues look to be pilot error, hitting trees, shutting off fuel accidently etc.

The splines houseing issues are a concern.

So it seems if that the drive from the engine is lost Rotor RPM decays very quickly or would that be from the material breaking up and causing drag?

Most likely the latter I imagine though reading the reports the RRPM drops quickly doesnt it.

Are they stopping producing the Kmax then?

I dont really see why, I dont think that is it a design issue though they dont have that many aircraft produced and have quite a few destroyed.

Interesting sites.

HF
HELOFAN is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 12:32
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt that the configuration has anything at all to do with the accident rate, but the mission (long hours hovering OGE close to obstructions) is certainly a difficult one.

I don't know why the synchropter config was not used for the later Kaman airfraft designs, which were naval shipboard aircraft ostensibly well suited to the syncropter design. If we are saying that Charlie Kaman dropped the syncropter from his bag of tricks, does that mean Dave must add him to Dave's private list of "Designers who don't know what a GOOD helicopter looks like"?
NickLappos is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 16:47
  #66 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nick;

Perhaps the teetering rotor is slowly being replaced by rotors with greater control authority. Thereby relegating this simpler and lower cost rotor to the recreationalists, in a manner similar to that of the gyrocopter.

Kellett wanted to produced a rigid 3-blade intermeshing helicopter many decades ago.

Dave
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 20:02
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Beyond the black stump!
Posts: 1,419
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Though most of the Kmax isues look to be pilot error, hitting trees, shutting off fuel accidently etc.

The splines houseing issues are a concern.

So it seems if that the drive from the engine is lost Rotor RPM decays very quickly or would that be from the material breaking up and causing drag?

Most likely the latter I imagine though reading the reports the RRPM drops quickly doesnt it.

Are they stopping producing the Kmax then?

I dont really see why, I dont think that is it a design issue though they dont have that many aircraft produced and have quite a few destroyed.

Interesting sites.

HF
They stopped production of the K-Max some time ago. The future of the aircraft will be dictated by the limited parts inventory at hand. Other issues included high acquisition costs, single engine operation in the operating environment they specialize in (dependent entirely on your point of view), and the extremely high insurance costs driven by a helicopter with a 42% loss rate - something that is incomparable in the helicopter business, or maybe even the entire aviation business.

The K-Max is not a bad machine, in fact it is very good at what it does. It is phenomenally slow however. There is also a very limited market for helicopters that only perform external load operations, as the Skycrane also found out when compared to a Chinook (oops, another dual rotor reference).

The facts above provide a pretty fair explanation as to why the K-Max has a limited future at this time, not to say it won't get ressurected in the future, perhaps by someone other tham Kaman even!
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2008, 23:49
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: north america
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
X49-A update.
This program still being funded. The aircraft has accumulated about 70hrs and is now undergoing an annual inspection. Testing will strart up again next month.
old rotorman is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 22:37
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tail rotor power?

What would you say, in percentage, was the power the tail rotor steals from the main unit when used to full right pedal?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 22:43
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: australia
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seventy eleven percent at least from the main unit and eleventy nine percent from each and every one of the other secondary units and none,nil,nada from all third and fourth units exept on odd days. On these days it is best to stay in bed with your wifes sister and not fly.
deeper is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2009, 03:11
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 73
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Merits of rotor configurations

What would you say, in percentage, was the power the tail rotor steals from the main unit when used to full right pedal?
I'll make a leap of faith and take it that you really mean "when the tail rotor is producing maximum thrust to counteract main rotor torque" since the answer would otherwise depend on whether you're talking about a Eurocopter, which spins the main rotor in a direction that God never intended, or say, a Bell or Sikorsky that turn the main rotor in the proper manner.
But with that nit picked, I offer this quote: "Tail rotors typically consume up to 5-10% of the total power" ... click here for source document

This is from a helicopter aerodynamics course taught by Prof. J. Gordon Leishman at the University of Maryland.
The complete document is an interesting although fairly brief discussion of "conventional", tandem, and co-axial rotor configurations.
WhirlyBob is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2009, 06:38
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On these days it is best to stay in bed with your wifes sister and not fly.
Which goes to debunk the old adage that Helicopters are inherently dangerous, it's really the pilots.
topendtorque is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2009, 21:05
  #73 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leishman's recent papers are devoted to the coaxial configurations.

A quick overview of Tail Rotor Power Consumption
Dave_Jackson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.