Tail Rotor Power Consumption

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 289
From: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Originally Posted by NickLappos
The pursuit of symmetry that is his mantra seems to be sparked by some internal asymmetry, frankly! Even Charlie Kaman, the inventor, dumped the syncropter configuration that Dave is wedded to, Dave has never tried to find out why.
http://www.kamanaero.com/images/PDFs...20Sikorsky.pdf
The K-max is still there, looks like it can lift a decent amount but you could just about catch it with a S300CBi.
-- IFMU
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
IFMU,
About a year ago Kaman mentioned that they would not be producing any more K_MAX's and that they were trying to sell the two that they were leasing out; as I recall.
They plan to stay strongly in the helicopter industry, but as a component manufacturer and not as a complete helicopter manufacturer.
Charles Kaman's failing health may have something to do with this.
Dave
About a year ago Kaman mentioned that they would not be producing any more K_MAX's and that they were trying to sell the two that they were leasing out; as I recall.
They plan to stay strongly in the helicopter industry, but as a component manufacturer and not as a complete helicopter manufacturer.
Charles Kaman's failing health may have something to do with this.
Dave

Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 21
From: Beyond the black stump!
The end of the K-Max has been driven by the horrifying accident rate.
http://www.markusherzig.com/kmax/
I'll let you interpret the data yourself!
http://www.markusherzig.com/kmax/
I'll let you interpret the data yourself!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: West Africa
Though most of the Kmax isues look to be pilot error, hitting trees, shutting off fuel accidently etc.
The splines houseing issues are a concern.
So it seems if that the drive from the engine is lost Rotor RPM decays very quickly or would that be from the material breaking up and causing drag?
Most likely the latter I imagine though reading the reports the RRPM drops quickly doesnt it.
Are they stopping producing the Kmax then?
I dont really see why, I dont think that is it a design issue though they dont have that many aircraft produced and have quite a few destroyed.
Interesting sites.
HF
The splines houseing issues are a concern.
So it seems if that the drive from the engine is lost Rotor RPM decays very quickly or would that be from the material breaking up and causing drag?
Most likely the latter I imagine though reading the reports the RRPM drops quickly doesnt it.
Are they stopping producing the Kmax then?
I dont really see why, I dont think that is it a design issue though they dont have that many aircraft produced and have quite a few destroyed.
Interesting sites.
HF
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 1
From: USA
I doubt that the configuration has anything at all to do with the accident rate, but the mission (long hours hovering OGE close to obstructions) is certainly a difficult one.
I don't know why the synchropter config was not used for the later Kaman airfraft designs, which were naval shipboard aircraft ostensibly well suited to the syncropter design. If we are saying that Charlie Kaman dropped the syncropter from his bag of tricks, does that mean Dave must add him to Dave's private list of "Designers who don't know what a GOOD helicopter looks like"?
I don't know why the synchropter config was not used for the later Kaman airfraft designs, which were naval shipboard aircraft ostensibly well suited to the syncropter design. If we are saying that Charlie Kaman dropped the syncropter from his bag of tricks, does that mean Dave must add him to Dave's private list of "Designers who don't know what a GOOD helicopter looks like"?
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Nick;
Perhaps the teetering rotor is slowly being replaced by rotors with greater control authority. Thereby relegating this simpler and lower cost rotor to the recreationalists, in a manner similar to that of the gyrocopter.
Kellett wanted to produced a rigid 3-blade intermeshing helicopter many decades ago.
Dave
Perhaps the teetering rotor is slowly being replaced by rotors with greater control authority. Thereby relegating this simpler and lower cost rotor to the recreationalists, in a manner similar to that of the gyrocopter.
Kellett wanted to produced a rigid 3-blade intermeshing helicopter many decades ago.
Dave

Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 21
From: Beyond the black stump!
Though most of the Kmax isues look to be pilot error, hitting trees, shutting off fuel accidently etc.
The splines houseing issues are a concern.
So it seems if that the drive from the engine is lost Rotor RPM decays very quickly or would that be from the material breaking up and causing drag?
Most likely the latter I imagine though reading the reports the RRPM drops quickly doesnt it.
Are they stopping producing the Kmax then?
I dont really see why, I dont think that is it a design issue though they dont have that many aircraft produced and have quite a few destroyed.
Interesting sites.
HF
The splines houseing issues are a concern.
So it seems if that the drive from the engine is lost Rotor RPM decays very quickly or would that be from the material breaking up and causing drag?
Most likely the latter I imagine though reading the reports the RRPM drops quickly doesnt it.
Are they stopping producing the Kmax then?
I dont really see why, I dont think that is it a design issue though they dont have that many aircraft produced and have quite a few destroyed.
Interesting sites.
HF
The K-Max is not a bad machine, in fact it is very good at what it does. It is phenomenally slow however. There is also a very limited market for helicopters that only perform external load operations, as the Skycrane also found out when compared to a Chinook (oops, another dual rotor reference).
The facts above provide a pretty fair explanation as to why the K-Max has a limited future at this time, not to say it won't get ressurected in the future, perhaps by someone other tham Kaman even!
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: australia
Seventy eleven percent at least from the main unit and eleventy nine percent from each and every one of the other secondary units and none,nil,nada from all third and fourth units exept on odd days. On these days it is best to stay in bed with your wifes sister and not fly.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Merits of rotor configurations
What would you say, in percentage, was the power the tail rotor steals from the main unit when used to full right pedal?

But with that nit picked, I offer this quote: "Tail rotors typically consume up to 5-10% of the total power" ... click here for source document
This is from a helicopter aerodynamics course taught by Prof. J. Gordon Leishman at the University of Maryland.
The complete document is an interesting although fairly brief discussion of "conventional", tandem, and co-axial rotor configurations.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Leishman's recent papers are devoted to the coaxial configurations.
A quick overview of Tail Rotor Power Consumption
A quick overview of Tail Rotor Power Consumption





