Super puma Bose
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Cornwall
I have, and use, both the Bose and David Clark ANR on the Mark 1 ( obviously not at the same time 
) and imho they are both as effective as the other with the ANR working. Both are set by Headset services, Shoreham to Low Impedence. With the Bose, I find that the active is better but the David Clark passive is better with less ANR. The David Clark is heavier and is tighter to the head but with the gel earpads quite acceptable. I have occasionally forgotten to switch on the David Clark ANR and didnt realise it since the passive protection is so good. With the Bose always have a spare battery available. Rechargeable batteries dont last as long as standard "heavy duty" batteries. Rechargeable PP3 batteries (DC headset) can only be charged to 8.1 volts. The Bose is more expensive than the David Clark. Personnally, I am not convinced on earplugs alone but then it is cheaper for Companies to provide earlpugs to comply anti-noise legislation than to buy effective headsets!!! Mind you, after 40 years flying turbine helicopters, my hearing is shot anyway!!! 
Fact though, since using an ANR, I find the long days not so tiring and my hearing, whats left of it, has not deteriorated further - pardon?? I think it is "horses for courses". Both have their pluses and minuses
) and imho they are both as effective as the other with the ANR working. Both are set by Headset services, Shoreham to Low Impedence. With the Bose, I find that the active is better but the David Clark passive is better with less ANR. The David Clark is heavier and is tighter to the head but with the gel earpads quite acceptable. I have occasionally forgotten to switch on the David Clark ANR and didnt realise it since the passive protection is so good. With the Bose always have a spare battery available. Rechargeable batteries dont last as long as standard "heavy duty" batteries. Rechargeable PP3 batteries (DC headset) can only be charged to 8.1 volts. The Bose is more expensive than the David Clark. Personnally, I am not convinced on earplugs alone but then it is cheaper for Companies to provide earlpugs to comply anti-noise legislation than to buy effective headsets!!! Mind you, after 40 years flying turbine helicopters, my hearing is shot anyway!!! Fact though, since using an ANR, I find the long days not so tiring and my hearing, whats left of it, has not deteriorated further - pardon?? I think it is "horses for courses". Both have their pluses and minuses
Last edited by TipCap; 20th February 2009 at 06:22. Reason: more info on David Clark
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: West coast Australia :)
Asianrotorhunter:
I use the silicone moulded plugs supplied by the company, they are a specific aviation plug. I can't remember the name sorry but they aren't cep's and they are a passive plug.
Si
I use the silicone moulded plugs supplied by the company, they are a specific aviation plug. I can't remember the name sorry but they aren't cep's and they are a passive plug.
Si
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: uk
Also Converted my Bose X to take the CEP, works great for me too.
I even did a brief "How to convert bose" post on here somewhere.
Without doubt the best solution by miles, I have tried most options too.
Biggles: NO NEED TO SHOUT, NOT EVERYONE HERE IS DEAF !!!
I even did a brief "How to convert bose" post on here somewhere.
Without doubt the best solution by miles, I have tried most options too.
Biggles: NO NEED TO SHOUT, NOT EVERYONE HERE IS DEAF !!!
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: West coast Australia :)
Biggles: NO NEED TO SHOUT, NOT EVERYONE HERE IS DEAF !!!
Si
