R44 rating
B73
Are you sure there was a 2006 TrainingCom seem to remember HeliTrainingCom 1/2005 said something like you have stated above.
However that AIC we keep talking about (72/2007) seems to imply that the new flying training requirements are a minimum of 2 hrs SEP to SEP, unless you are flying something not included in App1 to 2.245(b)(3), which in english is what we know as the single engine piston group. This means that Robinsons require 5 hrs of flight training (see below for the apparent get out).
There is however one bit I can't work out and that is that the AIC seems to imply that this may not be mandatory until next January, but I may have misread or misunderstood that bit. The AIC says that TRTOs CAN change their training manuals now but after January it will be mandatory.
Sorry to make things clear as mud again, but I don't think it quite as clear cut as it seems.
I know some schools are already applying the 5hr minimums for Robinson training. I don't know if this is by choice or necessity .
GS
Are you sure there was a 2006 TrainingCom seem to remember HeliTrainingCom 1/2005 said something like you have stated above.
However that AIC we keep talking about (72/2007) seems to imply that the new flying training requirements are a minimum of 2 hrs SEP to SEP, unless you are flying something not included in App1 to 2.245(b)(3), which in english is what we know as the single engine piston group. This means that Robinsons require 5 hrs of flight training (see below for the apparent get out).
There is however one bit I can't work out and that is that the AIC seems to imply that this may not be mandatory until next January, but I may have misread or misunderstood that bit. The AIC says that TRTOs CAN change their training manuals now but after January it will be mandatory.
Sorry to make things clear as mud again, but I don't think it quite as clear cut as it seems.
I know some schools are already applying the 5hr minimums for Robinson training. I don't know if this is by choice or necessity .
GS
Here's the pdf:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/1_2005_H.pdf
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Land of damp and drizzle
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I did my R44 rating in June, every school I spoke to said 5hrs + test. This was 4 or 5 different people. I guess if you had hundreds or thousands of hours in a 22, and you had a school who knew you well, you might get away with 3hrs + test, but 5 seems the norm these days.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why would you want to do it in 3? Go for the 5 hrs and AUTO AUTO AUTO. When you're done that AUTO AUTO AUTO. Add some Max Gross training at decent temps to train you not to panic when the horn goes off and your engine is still running. If it's got Hyd learn to land that thing vertically if you have to. Save an hour for a windy day and land in a confined spot and see how the RPM drops when you lose the wind and you pull too fast. As said above it's all about proficiency. Training is like a Helmet...you will probably only need it ONCE! And if you do, you won't have time to think about it too much.
I'm just a silly Canuck working in the snow right now, but even staying busy/steady at anywhere from 50-100 hrs a month I never turn down training. If you are private I know cost is an issue. But do yourself a favour and suck it up now REALLY REALLY good. Flying is like sex...there's never enough. Training more so!
BWB
I'm just a silly Canuck working in the snow right now, but even staying busy/steady at anywhere from 50-100 hrs a month I never turn down training. If you are private I know cost is an issue. But do yourself a favour and suck it up now REALLY REALLY good. Flying is like sex...there's never enough. Training more so!
BWB
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to Fred Cross (last week), minimum training time for a Robbo type rating is now 5 hours plus test, irrespective of previous experience. The Helicopter TrainingCom has been overtaken by Amendment 4 to JAR-FCL 2, implemented by the AIC, and is no longer valid.
type rating time!
Hi,
Tried searching, but the three letter limit is a problem!
I am trying to find out if adding an R22 rating (to an R44) rating involves 5 hours, with an instructor sign-off. I have been told that it's 5 hours, and then a check-ride which is clearly more (expensive
).
Thanks for any info!
Sam.
Tried searching, but the three letter limit is a problem!
I am trying to find out if adding an R22 rating (to an R44) rating involves 5 hours, with an instructor sign-off. I have been told that it's 5 hours, and then a check-ride which is clearly more (expensive
).Thanks for any info!
Sam.
Hovering AND talking
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think it's instructor sign-off, you'll need an examiner as well.
Cheers
Whirls
Cheers
Whirls
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Land of damp and drizzle
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How long the skills test lasts depends on your skills and the examiner. This isn't a full PPL skills test, so you don't have to do a nav. I've heard as low as 20 mins total, and as high as 1.5 - YMMV!
It's 5 hours plus test, although if a TRTO is authorised (ie. it's written into their ops manual and AOC), at the CFI's discretion, they can reduce the training requirements to 3 hours plus test, if (in their opinion) you have sufficient experience on a similar type. Unless you have quite a lot of experience, though, I wouldn't rely on this.
It's 5 hours plus test, although if a TRTO is authorised (ie. it's written into their ops manual and AOC), at the CFI's discretion, they can reduce the training requirements to 3 hours plus test, if (in their opinion) you have sufficient experience on a similar type. Unless you have quite a lot of experience, though, I wouldn't rely on this.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 18 Degrees North
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sam,
the content of an LST (type rating test) is the same as that for an LPC, so it should not take 1.5, it should take no more than 1.0
the content for an initial PPL skill test is much greater.
pandalet,
where does it say this in lasors, hours requirements are mentioned in appendix F, Section F, page 59, but i cannot see 3 hours mentioned in this context. I am not saying you are wrong, I just cant find it.
I think helcopters within the "single engine group" may be ok for 3 hours, but the R22,R44 are not in the group, but i couldnt find that either without a big search as I am too busy doing my R22 MCC course to find out !
regards
CF
5 hours, plus test - so approx 6.5 in total...
the content for an initial PPL skill test is much greater.
pandalet,
It's 5 hours plus test, although if a TRTO is authorised (ie. it's written into their ops manual and AOC), at the CFI's discretion, they can reduce the training requirements to 3 hours plus test, if (in their opinion) you have sufficient experience on a similar type.
I think helcopters within the "single engine group" may be ok for 3 hours, but the R22,R44 are not in the group, but i couldnt find that either without a big search as I am too busy doing my R22 MCC course to find out !
regards
CF
Last edited by Camp Freddie; 29th Oct 2008 at 09:44.