Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

What the hell do we have JAR-FCL for?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

What the hell do we have JAR-FCL for?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Sep 2007, 07:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ...on the go-around...
Age: 49
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry What the hell do we have JAR-FCL for?

Good morning (well, for some of us),

I have run into several problems regarding JAR-FCL before in the past, but this does make it to the very top of bad conduct by the authorities quite easily:

Having done an (initial) instrument rating in one JAA member state you would assume that another JAA member state would put it on your license.
Everything was conducted according to JAR-FCL by a well respected English FTO licensed to do the training. So far so good. Now I took it all to my authorities and they have refused to put the IR on my license for weeks .

First they claimed a lack of documentation. Fair enough, not really but one does things to please them from time to time anyway. It took me several days to collect what they wanted. Now the problem seems to have shifted somewhat and it is suddenly connected to the IR not having been conducted according to JAR-FCL 2 (national version). Can you believe it?

But the best is yet to come - last year they accepted a complete EC 135 type-rating from the very same FTO without any problems!

I have just started with a new company and part of the contract was of course an IR on my license. We are halfway through the type-rating and my time is running out .

It all makes reading lasors sound like a farce. Facilitating the coordination of training within the JAA states and all that other .

Yes, after years in this business I should know better but even now it still leaves me frustrated having to deal with this sort of .

I believe you can see where this is leading so I would be very much obliged if anyone could share some experience regarding the matter.

Rant over & thank you for bearing with me chaps

WSPS
WSPS is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 07:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 807
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Solution:
Move to the country you got your IR from.
The country that is responsible for your tickets now will send everything over to the country you moved to.
That country will then be responsible for your license....and hopefully endorse your IR.
GoodGrief is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 08:02
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ...on the go-around...
Age: 49
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did actually try to get a CAA license. But as you said, when not a UK resident...

I am an EU citizen though but I have less than a month to solve this now. My IR skill test was at the beginning of August. Nearly three months was plenty of time I thought and although I would love to be back in the UK I am running out of time.

Where are all the people who have done an IR abroad and faced the same problem that I have now. I thought there must be at least a few with experience on this.

Cheers
WSPS is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 09:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which country did you get the IR in and which country are you trying to get it endorsed within?

SL
ScrumpyLuvver is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 10:20
  #5 (permalink)  
QTG
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 104
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
JAA IRs

In theory, the answer is fairly simple. The agreement between JAA States stipulates that the IRT must be conducted by the National Authority to which the FTO conducting the training subscribes. The IR will then be issued by the candidate's licence issuing Authority.
In practice, its far from easy. For example, an IR course carried out by a UK FTO, in Germany, on German licenced pilots, using German registered aircraft, must be tested by the UK CAA. The German LBA will then issue the ratings. Trust me - I was that FTO!
QTG is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 11:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Desert Rat
Age: 53
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down This JAR shnurfel

This must be a common problem. I did a factory type rating according to JAR FCL2 and the written exam and the checkride were not validated by the other very competent authority.

The term MAFIA comes to mind!!!
alouette is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 11:52
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ...on the go-around...
Age: 49
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VICTORY!

Incredibly, at last they caved in this very afternoon.

Sorry to have made a fuss, but it really did not look like it was going to happen.

Maybe the possibility of legal proceedings helped the matter in the end .

If you have a similar problem, please post here, pm me or send an email. We simply cannot accept anything like that.

Thank you for your posts.

WSPS
WSPS is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 13:09
  #8 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's the licensing authorities for you, we exist merely to support them. Frustrating I know but these things happen from time to time.
boogie-nicey is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 17:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congratulations on your Victory!

Now get flying.
Brilliant Stuff is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 18:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ncredibly, at last they caved in this very afternoon.

Sorry to have made a fuss, but it really did not look like it was going to happen.

Maybe the possibility of legal proceedings helped the matter in the end .
Nah , more like the head of licensing reads rotorheads....
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 07:30
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ...on the go-around...
Age: 49
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just out of interest. Has anyone taken the authorities to court for this?

I was prepared to do just that

Cheers
WSPS is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 08:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 807
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think you would have lost.
The abbreviated course based on ICAO IFR is not part of FCL2, or have I missed something.
So, technically speaking...

I stand to be corrected...
GoodGrief is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 09:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: on a spinning wheel
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel IR Victory

Congratulations A.

How you doing? Hope you'll get in the air soon. Hat die Drawe nun doch nachgegeben...

Beste Grüße aus SA

RB

rotor beetle is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2007, 15:47
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ...on the go-around...
Age: 49
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sie hat!

Now off to the North Sea at last!

@GoodGrief

Abbreviated course? ICAO? I am sure my course was conducted under JAR-FCL 2. If I would have had a CAA issued JAR license it would have gone on there straight away.

I am just concerned about what other people might experience. A good few of the pilots I know are at least thinking about getting an IR. If they want good value for their money presently they will have to go abroad.

So it appears that we have not quite arrived at the situation that was advertised then .

I should have know all along of course. It was my own fault of falling for it. But I just could have done without the fight .
WSPS is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 20:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: clinging to the wreckage
Age: 54
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JAR FCL and National Differences

Ok so i appreciate that individual countries have (and maybe need) differences from JAR FCL 2 regs.
I am working in europe and am constantly being told that the national regs allow this or that, many of these differences are in direct contravention to JAR FCL 2 (not even got started on the JAR OPS side) is this right ??? (couple of examples. well expired licences being held as good for a theory pass, No Comms exam for ATPL)

Thoughts please gents (and ladies of course)
tony 1969 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 20:29
  #16 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Each country can decide, which of the "joint" rules will also be valid in this specific country-as long as they filed all differences with the authorities...
 
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 21:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Each country can decide, which of the "joint" rules will also be valid in this specific country
Therein lies the whole problem - they are not rules, they are requirements. Each individual country can implement only those requirements that that their national legislation allows. There is no longer even a requirement to file differences; let's face it, since the JAA no longer exists, there's nobody to file differences with.

This will all change with the EASA implementing rules for pilot licensing, which will, in 2012, become EU law and, as such, will override national law. After that, all EU member states will have to abide by the implementing rules irrespective of what their national law states (except, of course, for those states that habitually ignore any EU law that doesn't suit their national interest).
BillieBob is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2010, 22:34
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Just over there....no there.
Age: 61
Posts: 364
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IR or no IR das die Drawe nachgegeben hat ist DER Schlagzeile!
The LBA...the largest lit obstruction to aviation ( not marked on the map) in Germany, but we have the CAA
CyclicRick is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.