Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

'Not above 500ft'

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

'Not above 500ft'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Sep 2007, 22:02
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: England
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
500ft Rule

BT
It is written into the CAA AOC of SAR operator, for training and Ops
I do not know about HEMS. I Understand that HEMS has its own JARs section
although JAR OPS 3 does not apply to SAR.
regards
P

Last edited by Presstransdown; 17th Sep 2007 at 07:25.
Presstransdown is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2007, 15:01
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: sunny side up
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point is:

a. If a civilian helicopter needs to be low level to carry out his job and
b. needs to transit a MATZ and
c. is required by law to be above 500' agl

then what is he /she to do if a military controller should deny a clearance when in fact a clearance is not a legal requirement? An interesting conundrum.

I do get your point about blindly bumbling around in an active MATZ, very very stupid I agree. However, just to add another dimension, how do you square the circle of gliders without radios flying in an active MATZ, do they not operate without clearances?
Max_Chat is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2007, 15:27
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Max, I know of plenty of MATZs where gliding sites operate close to the boundaries and some MATZs where gliding takes place when normal ops have ceased but I haven't seen non-resident (for want of a better term) gliders routinely penetrating MATZs without prior arrangement or normal clearance.

If they are doing it then they are barking and show very poor airmanship.

I think the real answer to cyclically's problem is the 6 Ps or is it 7?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2007, 15:41
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: sunny side up
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes and Yes (inside or outside a MATZ a very barking pastime indeed). Shame that MATZ's could not be CTZ's and given a status that would make sense (IMHO).
Max_Chat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.