Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicsa S61 - Tenerife - Prelim report

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicsa S61 - Tenerife - Prelim report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jul 2007, 11:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face Helicsa S61 - Tenerife - Prelim report

Prelim report on S61 Tenerife crash published last month. MRB failure of Black Blade highlighted, with indications that BIM system/refilling valve on that Black Blade were leaking days before accident, and that maintenance as per MM carried out.

20 mins into the flight, the Cockpit BIM lights up, we know this because the Pilot announces "Look we are at BIM PRESS"and nothing more is heard of relevence on the CVR until the Black Blade lets go 30 mins later. My reading of this is that everyone assumes it is the unreliability of the monitoring system rather than a fatigue crack. Hence the blade lets go with the inevitable consequences.

Blade had 6750 hrs on it. I suppose we shall never know, outside a courtroom, what advice was going to and from UTC and Helicsa about the reliability of the BIM system.
Swiss Cheese is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2007, 11:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: northeast usa
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RFM says if you get bim warning, you reduce airspeed and land as soon as practical. Did they follow the emergency procedure?
toolguy is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2007, 13:51
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
response to Toolguy

It was going 120kts just before the radar trace was lost, and no prior speed is given in the report.

Arguably, they could have done an emergency stop in Tenerife, and if the light had been a one-off, then for sure. But the context and build up to this accident seem to show that a properly diagnosed leak from the refilling valve, temporarily repaired as per MM, was the suspected cause of the inflight BIM alert. However, they were sadly wrong: Justified "confirmation bias".......I just do not know!
Swiss Cheese is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.