A golden opportunity...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 59
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A golden opportunity...
A local friend of mine is to take delivery of a 280 fx shark in the coming months. It may be I will fork out for the rating on the 280 (I am currently rated on the R22) and fly his machine.
I have researched the Enstrom products but the only tangible I can not get feedback on is how the two compare in handling / safety / better machine etc.
Be grateful for anyone's feedback.
KDDDD
I have researched the Enstrom products but the only tangible I can not get feedback on is how the two compare in handling / safety / better machine etc.
Be grateful for anyone's feedback.
KDDDD
KDDD,
This thread should answer most of your questions:
Enstrom Corner
If you've got any more, I'm sure that a gent called Gaseous - an Enstrom owner (amongst others) - would be happy to try to answer them.
This thread should answer most of your questions:
Enstrom Corner
If you've got any more, I'm sure that a gent called Gaseous - an Enstrom owner (amongst others) - would be happy to try to answer them.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Escrick York england
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have researched the Enstrom products but the only tangible I can not get feedback on is how the two compare in handling FAR BETTER /safety EVEN MORE BETTER / better machine you have already said that yourself .
in all cases the enstrom fx is a far superior helicopter than the robinson ,
and also remember the uk safety record no one has ever had a fatal accident in a enstrom in the uk
in all cases the enstrom fx is a far superior helicopter than the robinson ,
and also remember the uk safety record no one has ever had a fatal accident in a enstrom in the uk
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: N/A
Age: 42
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have about 80 hours on both - and the enstrom is a much nicer machine to fly. Its smoother, a little faster and has a little more power. The Rrpm doesnt fluctuate as much when practicing autos and its has a better safety record.
If you have only flown a robo before though - you may find using the throttle more a bit confusing because there is no governor on the enstrom.
The enstrom is also aerobatic (no teetering head)
Still, although i do appreciate the plus sides of the robo (and yes it has a couple) - i was glad that i learnt to fly in the enstrom simply because of the throttle manipulations you have to use, and the governor failures i have had in the robo.
Hope this helps!!!
If you have only flown a robo before though - you may find using the throttle more a bit confusing because there is no governor on the enstrom.
The enstrom is also aerobatic (no teetering head)
Still, although i do appreciate the plus sides of the robo (and yes it has a couple) - i was glad that i learnt to fly in the enstrom simply because of the throttle manipulations you have to use, and the governor failures i have had in the robo.
Hope this helps!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 59
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always feel safe in my Robbie, but then again i never do anything creative so to speak. After having read everything on the forum about the Enstom product I am quite looking forward to trying the 280.
My only reservation is the throttle manipulation but I am certain that will come.
It seems I will have to travel to do the rating. I live near to Peterborough. Any advice as to closest school would be appreciated.
KDDDD
My only reservation is the throttle manipulation but I am certain that will come.
It seems I will have to travel to do the rating. I live near to Peterborough. Any advice as to closest school would be appreciated.
KDDDD
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Age: 59
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"and the governor failures i have had in the robo."
Wow, for a few thousand accumulated flying hours I can't recall a single governor failure in any of the Robbos at the place I fly from, so to have had multiple failures in 80 seems pretty unlucky?
Wow, for a few thousand accumulated flying hours I can't recall a single governor failure in any of the Robbos at the place I fly from, so to have had multiple failures in 80 seems pretty unlucky?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my tank engine
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could try Manchester Helicopter Center at Barton airfield, I don't know if they are the closest to you but they’ve been flying Enstroms for umpteen years.
http://www.themanchesterhelicopterce.../home/default/
http://www.themanchesterhelicopterce.../home/default/
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 59
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for that. Have visited their web site and got all the data. Looks like the thick end of £2K to do the conversion. I must now balance the rental cost post rating vs R22 wet rent cost currently around £165 hr plus VAT.
That said, what price safety? By all accounts from my study Enstrom appear to be a more robust aircraft. My wife could be swayed by this tack as she is never comfortable with me flying anyway.
That said, what price safety? By all accounts from my study Enstrom appear to be a more robust aircraft. My wife could be swayed by this tack as she is never comfortable with me flying anyway.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 59
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have just spent some time looking over the FX as it has arrived.
First of all what a great looking machine. I never realised it would be so much bigger than the R22. Everything just has a more substantial look and feel to it from the nose to the tail rotor.
The drive belt is about 5" inches wide for Pete's sake
Altogether a different animal and I totally 'get' all the comments I have read these few days. I really am looking forward to do the rating now. It looks sleek and shark like for sure. I just know autos are going to be a tad more leisurely.
There may be other newbie pruners, low hour, just tasting the world of rotary post ppl like me so for their benefit I will report my experience between the two when we get the job going.
Starting this coming Monday...
First of all what a great looking machine. I never realised it would be so much bigger than the R22. Everything just has a more substantial look and feel to it from the nose to the tail rotor.
The drive belt is about 5" inches wide for Pete's sake
Altogether a different animal and I totally 'get' all the comments I have read these few days. I really am looking forward to do the rating now. It looks sleek and shark like for sure. I just know autos are going to be a tad more leisurely.
There may be other newbie pruners, low hour, just tasting the world of rotary post ppl like me so for their benefit I will report my experience between the two when we get the job going.
Starting this coming Monday...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Zealand
Age: 51
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The enstrom is also aerobatic (no teetering head)"
So what is your version of Aerobatics HP1982? A Stars and H300s don't have teetering heads and I've yet to see one loop or roll like a BO105........
Have worked on Robbies for years and haven't heard of any governor failures but I'm sure KDDDD won't fall victim to confusion having to work the throttle in flight as he would normally have to at the start and end of every flight anyway.
So what is your version of Aerobatics HP1982? A Stars and H300s don't have teetering heads and I've yet to see one loop or roll like a BO105........
Have worked on Robbies for years and haven't heard of any governor failures but I'm sure KDDDD won't fall victim to confusion having to work the throttle in flight as he would normally have to at the start and end of every flight anyway.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 59
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slim 40 indeed I will, however all in good time.
I meet the instructor this coming Monday. I have a 'go' from Mrs KDDDD (she who must be obeyed) with a spend limit up to £3K.
So full report in the future as I do the cross over.
KDDDD
I meet the instructor this coming Monday. I have a 'go' from Mrs KDDDD (she who must be obeyed) with a spend limit up to £3K.
So full report in the future as I do the cross over. KDDDD
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 59
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At this moment I know him as 'Tim'. He is meeting the aircraft owner to do a refresher and I will be waiting in the wings so to speak. I will pm you with his details once I know fully unless you already know him?
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alderney or Lancashire UK
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"I'm sure that a gent called Gaseous - an Enstrom owner (amongst others) - would be happy to try to answer them." Thanks B73,certainly will.
KDDDD
I started off with R22 then R44 ratings before moving on to Enstrom. All 3 are fine machines but I am happiest in a good Enstrom - and there is the problem. I have flown some bloody awful ones. In good condition and set up right they are a joy to fly.
There are plenty of people who post here who hate Enstroms, probably because their only experience of them is in one of the duds.
To keep them nice takes an engineer who truly understands them and an owner who is prepared to pay what it takes.
I hope your friends FX is a good one. If it is, you'll love it.
Phil
KDDDD
I started off with R22 then R44 ratings before moving on to Enstrom. All 3 are fine machines but I am happiest in a good Enstrom - and there is the problem. I have flown some bloody awful ones. In good condition and set up right they are a joy to fly.
There are plenty of people who post here who hate Enstroms, probably because their only experience of them is in one of the duds.
To keep them nice takes an engineer who truly understands them and an owner who is prepared to pay what it takes.
I hope your friends FX is a good one. If it is, you'll love it.
Phil
Last edited by Gaseous; 6th Jul 2007 at 08:47. Reason: I wish I could type accurately
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belgium
Age: 60
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'I just know autos are going to be a tad more leisurely.'
I can assure it's more than a tad. They are extremely relaxed.
The instructor is probably Tim Price from Shoreham, nice chap loads of experience.
The helicopter might have aerobatic capabilities, but are still prohibited and are you aerobatic. Watch the Dennis Kenyon video, but don't try it yourself!
The Enstrom is in my opinion by far the best 2-3 seater piston helicopter on the market, for cruising I would say. I wish you a lot of fun with it.
ps. don't worry about throttle control. it's very easy in the Enstrom, you hardly have to move it at all.
I can assure it's more than a tad. They are extremely relaxed.
The instructor is probably Tim Price from Shoreham, nice chap loads of experience.
The helicopter might have aerobatic capabilities, but are still prohibited and are you aerobatic. Watch the Dennis Kenyon video, but don't try it yourself!
The Enstrom is in my opinion by far the best 2-3 seater piston helicopter on the market, for cruising I would say. I wish you a lot of fun with it.
ps. don't worry about throttle control. it's very easy in the Enstrom, you hardly have to move it at all.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire
Age: 59
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe this man does come up from Shoreham. The aircraft has just had new blades fitted so I am sure the tracking must have been done at the same time. Thanks to all for all comments and advice so far.
KDDDD
KDDDD