Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helmets in offshore ops?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helmets in offshore ops?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2007, 16:21
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so, only £600 then. Bargain!

Still doesn't sort the headset issue out. Can I get tax relief on a headset?
helimutt is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 16:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helimut

Yes!
Speak to your BALPA rep or your friendly taxman!

bondu
bondu is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 16:47
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my tank engine
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Helimut as Bondu said yes you can (But this is provided you empolyer does not suply a noise canceling headset, see the following link;

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM50051.htm

Last edited by ThomasTheTankEngine; 30th Jun 2007 at 17:00.
ThomasTheTankEngine is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 17:13
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
rotordk, while I agree with you that the vast majority of pax probably wouldn't care either way, I have personal experience of the machinations of otherwise well-intentioned shore-based management.
As in many industries, given an opportunity to meddle in things that don't really concern them..............
diginagain is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 18:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Between layers
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Guess it's not the pax then .
rotordk is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 18:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The pax are happy to get a ride home. It's the irregular visitor who might wonder why, if the front-seaters wear a bone-dome, why can't the SLF?
diginagain is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 19:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Between layers
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

mayby the irregular visitor should wonder why the airport busses don't have seatbelts for the passengers, but only for the busdriver.
rotordk is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 19:07
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ah, but in the UK our buses are fitted with seatbelts for the pax.
diginagain is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 19:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Between layers
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall the busses driving you to your departing aircraft lacks the mentioned safetyfeature in UK airports. I vaguely recollect the missing seats, but the straps overhead where there(not wellsuited for vertically challenged people).
The point is.....why can a person (irregular visitor..) with no aviation background be capable of determining the safety of something they don't have a clue about ?
Safety should be our first concern in all aviation decisions, shouldn't it !
Why is there 600 kg of safety-stuff strapped to the helicopter in the northsea enviroment, if the pilot is incapable of flipping the proper switches
at the right time (being unconsicous at the wrong time)!!??
rotordk is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 19:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Q1
why can a person (irregular visitor..) with no aviation background be capable of determining the safety of something they don't have a clue about ?
A1 - Beancounters
Q2
Safety should be our first concern in all aviation decisions, shouldn't it !(?)
A2 - see A1 above.
diginagain is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 19:55
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Between layers
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since this tale of wonder has now been investigated and found to be lacking foundations in reality, let's no longer blame the pax for not getting a piece of safety equipment.
rotordk is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2007, 21:22
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hi Helimut as Bondu said yes you can (But this is provided you empolyer does not suply a noise canceling headset, see the following link;

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM50051.htm

So, just still waiting to see if the 'promised' noise cancelling headsets are gonna turn up first. Believe they are to be ordered, but painfully noisy till then on some of our 76's.
helimutt is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2007, 03:51
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helmets

I find the argument for wearing helmets has taken on an almost evangelical slant much like that used by proponents of bicycle helmets by adults. This makes me worry that first it will be helmets for those who want them and eventually it will be mandatory helmets for all.
One of my better days was when I got out of the military and was able to take off the helmet and put on a headset. The idea of sitting in an S-76 in Karratha in the summer makes my eyes water, having to wear a helmet at the same time would probably bring on early retirement.
On 19 June the Australian newspaper reported that "the inquirery into the Black Hawk disaster on the HMAS Kanimbla last year heard that Capt. Bingley's helmet got snagged on the helicopter's antenna as he tried to escape. He managed to free himself after submerging 30m, but could not be revivied."
dpale is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 03:02
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the inquirery into the Black Hawk disaster on the HMAS Kanimbla last year heard that Capt. Bingley's helmet got snagged on the helicopter's antenna as he tried to escape. He managed to free himself after submerging 30m, but could not be revivied
dpale - you believe what you read in a paper? Ask yourself if he could not be revived who witnessed the fact he got snagged. If you want to wade through the inquiry report you will find that it was the co-pilot who got snagged, and further, the helmet saved him from an injury that may well have lead to his demise (my conclusion from the damage the helmet incurred).

The comment about wearing helmets while driving is quite appro as well. A brain surgeon in Oz being interviewed for a road safety campaign opined that there would be far fewer deaths and brain injury victims if car occupants wore helmets.

Last edited by Brian Abraham; 29th Jul 2007 at 03:16.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 05:54
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To me the helmet will save my hearing anything else is a bonus, as regards to cool. I can not see that catching on down the Essex high street. IMHO.

Why not leave it as free choice? After all we don't all wear Y-fronts.
Brilliant Stuff is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 08:04
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Age: 74
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helmets

Cannot imagine anything worse than flying for 8 hours in a helmet. Like others I was glad to give mine up when leaving the military.
Remember you do not, like me, speak for all North Sea pilots so stop trying to ram your ideas down our throats. At present there are far more important issues on the North Sea like lack of communications and no radar cover past 80 nm which seem to be taking forever to sort out.
OffshoreHeli is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 08:09
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aberdeenshire
Age: 49
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P3 do you fly north sea? or commercially at all for that matter? If not then you probably don't appreciate the type of weather conditions that we have to endure, severe turbulance is not uncommon and with all the switches knobs and buttons above and around our heads i would feel alot safer wearing a helmet than not. On nearly all platforms at some stage one member of the crew has to get out of the helicopter and on the rigs All personell working outside are supposed to wear some sort of head protection.
If pilots find helmets uncomfortable then surely it should be our decision if we want to wear them.
As to your idea that we want to wear them to look "cool". I dont see gucci stamped all over the immersion suits that we wear!!! and if we did want to look cool who would we be trying to impress?.......the hairey a**sed HLO on the heli deck??
T4 Risen is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 10:06
  #38 (permalink)  
floatsarmed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Helmets On

Not much point doing all that HUET training if you are unconcious?
We had a quick count up over a few beers the other night and out of the hundred or so pilots in the company 15 had been in the water at some point in their offshore careers. Some more than once!
I guess at the end of the day its a personal choice but for me its a no brainer - helmets on.
 
Old 29th Jul 2007, 11:38
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some very interesting points.
From what I have read I confirm my thoughts that the North Sea needs helmets and the sooner the better, I do believe that it should be a personal choice so for those that do not wish to wear them may not.
My question is now how do we go about getting them provided? Should we go through BALPA and leave it to them?
As with all issues like this it takes a vast amount of time for anything to be agreed. For those that don't want to wait that long can we just start wearing helmets if you already have them?
If we do and the operator starts to object can you carry on wearing it?
stabout is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2007, 13:12
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TTT,

Having done both SAR and NS, there is no comparison between the environments. The only commonality is the sea. The bottom line is that when NS, if you loose an engine, you will fly away; at times in SAR, if you loose an engine you will crash. That is why SAR pilots wear helmets. And certainly in the machines I have flown, I have never knocked a switch with my helmet, even in the mountains where the turbulence is far greater than anything in the NS.

Helmets are bloody uncomfortable in hot weather and in my opinion offer poorer noise attenuation than a standard headset.

For my money, STASS before helmets.
Droopystop is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.