Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Move over Robinson R88

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Move over Robinson R88

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd May 2007 | 12:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: leicester
Move over Robinson R88

The new robinson R188!

g-mady is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2007 | 12:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: UK
Did the beast ever fly or is this the Russian 'spruce goose' ?
Three Blades is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2007 | 12:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
I think I could have flown my first circuit in that........ I mean inside that . Say... thats a nice collection of bombs in the foreground, looks like there is one for every occasion - No job to big or small.
Heli-kiwi is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2007 | 12:18
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: leicester
no thats the R22, R33, R44, R55.....

Ill get my coat!
g-mady is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2007 | 18:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: A cold country
It did fly, this Mi-12, just like the Hughes Spruce Goose did - but only testflights ..

But what I find funny is that this Russian "helicopter" is named Homer ..
What a name for it. That says it all about the design of it and reminds me about one of The Simpson shows where Homer was asked to design a car ..



- madman
madman1145 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2007 | 19:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
The Homer is 'just barely' an Interleaving helicopter. It appears that only two Interleaving helicopters were ever build. Interestingly, one is the largest helicopter ever built and the other is close to being the smallest.

IMHO, the Homer is the harbinger of tomorrow's transport helicopters.
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2007 | 19:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: Harwich
I thought 'Homer' was just its NATO code name - helicopter code names all began with H and the two syllables meant something else (cf 'Hark'). Or something.
Hilico is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2007 | 01:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 491
Likes: 3
From: Iceland
Madman1145 can you tell us then if its true it could lift 40tonnes?
rotorrookie is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2007 | 03:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 1
From: USA
Altitude with 40 000 kg payload : 2 255 m
Date of flight: 06/08/1969
Pilot: Vasily KOLOCHENKO (USSR)
Crew: L.V. VLASSOV, V.V. JURAVLEV, V.P. BARTCHENKOV, S.G. RIBALKO, A.I. KRUTCHKOV
Course/place: Podmoskovnoe (USSR)
Rotorcraft:
V-12 (4 D-25, 6 500 hp each)



and More!



see:
http://records.fai.org/rotorcraft/aircraft.asp?id=3161

Last edited by NickLappos; 4th May 2007 at 03:57.
NickLappos is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2007 | 06:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Some more information on the Mi-12 Homer;

5 pages from 'Soviet Helicopters - Design, Development and Tactics' ~ by John Everett-Heath
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2007 | 15:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
From: Cambridgeshire, UK
Talking to a guy who started his career as a stress engineer at MIL, yesterday. Apparently the FBW intro'd in '94 on the Mi-26, which in an earlier form sourced the Mi-12 powertrain, allows 74 degrees of pitch! This allows some incredible rates of climb, and transition accel. I assume he meant unladen, as machine mass is equal to it's payload.

http://www.b-domke.de/AviationImages/Halo.html

It would be interesting to hear from other sources about that rotorhead. The FBW apparently controls the hydraulics through the ECU, rather than bushless DC motor which is more common now. Kindof wishing i had taken that aero stress engineer job myself (although the salary was awful)...


Dave, from your ref i gather the Mi-12 config was chosen as a compromise over tandem to allow STOL at MAUM, by virtue of wings and both rotors in clean air. Tandem would have allowed VTOL, but at reduced MAUM. Not sure why advancing over wings would have helped clearance though, since flapback would be the same with either rotation.

Mart
Graviman is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.