Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

H21 Heli crash videos

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

H21 Heli crash videos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Apr 2007, 16:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Townsend,WA. USA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nick said:
they use the support wires drawn through dies, to absorb the energy, up to about 12 g's.
That is interesting. How does that work?
Does the wire get smaller and absorb the energy? or just friction?
slowrotor is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2007, 22:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
slow, exactly, the wire is pulled thru a die that is smaller than the wire, so it squeezes it, and this absorbs the energy.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 04:30
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nick,

One aspect I noticed is how far forward the upper body, of the dummy in the front, travels. Aren't the safety harness' suppose to prevent this from happening?
Alfa Hotel is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 07:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UH-60 passenger and crew seats use the wire bit too, stiff wire that anchors halfway down a shaft on the backrest, comes up, loops around an attaching hook, then goes back down about a foot IIRC and is attached to nothing. Acts like a pulley, with the wire bending around the circular metal portion of the attach hook as it passes through during the stroke, absorbing the energy. We had a nasty crash in Afghanistan where the helicopter hit pretty hard, everyone in their seat and seatbelted lived. The pax onboard (Marines) were well off enough that they hopped out and started pulling security right after!

-Mike
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 11:43
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amazing stuff, TwinHueyMan, this must go a long way to help trust the machine. Was the machine salvagable, or are you not able to give details?

Actually, touching on discussion with MG, i am curious what say an S-70 is designed to withstand and fly away from. I would imagine so many "hard landings" will be factored into the fatigue life (Miner's law for fatigue calcs). In theory as long as component doesn't yield, it still has some service life. In practice even with some damage a component may not actually start to crack (as long as damage does not cause stress concentration).

Mart
Graviman is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 13:10
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alfa,
The belt behavior is a lesson learned, because the inertia reel doesn't stop that bend forward. The most severe injury is cyclic striking the face, and in futire incarnations, airbags on the inst panel will be used (Comanche had them). Nonetheless, the crew survival after horendous accidents is amazing. One Sea Hawk accident had the aircraft fly into the ground at very high sink rate, come apart and then slide into a stand of trees. The crew walked away from the wreckage, and the only recognizable pieces in the wreckage were the fuel cells, which were substantially unharmed, but no longer housed in the surrounding structure.

Again, these levels of protection were selected by studying 3800 lost Hueys, and chosing to pretect the crew in the 95th %ile event.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 13:30
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,300
Received 523 Likes on 218 Posts
Some aircraft have seltbelts that attach to the seat which is free to slide for adjustment fore and aft by means of rails with detents for the latching mechanism.

The Army added armor to the seat and pilots added weight to the seat load by the wearing of body armor and other equipment.

Alas, when the aircraft crashed with any significant forward momentum....the seat with a tightly secured human crash dummy launched itself against or through the forward end of the aircraft.

Several Chinook pilots found themselves outside the aircraft in a hostile environment with very serious injuries.

Attaching the belts to the floor of the aircraft then added a problem of using the pilot's innards as a cushion for a runaway armored seat.

SASless is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 15:51
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nasty way to learn about development issues, Sasless.

Nick, before airbags were fitted to cars in Europe, steering column crush cans gave a suprising improvement to injury level. The UK data interpretation expert is a guy by the name of Prof Murray Mackay, who i think recently retired from Birmingham Uni - very helpful chap. Collapsible cyclics with rubber tips might offer a good retrofit for machines already in service.

Out of interest, what range of g factors would be expected for service landings?

Mart
Graviman is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 16:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mart,
There are break-away cyclics, as you suggest. The funny thing about airbags is that the Army insisted in installing them in the Comanche, even though it had a side stick that was no head hazard at all!

The typical landing in service is usually less than 1.2 g, and a really rough one might be 1.5 (on a bet I once flew a traffic pattern to a landing and stayed below 1.1g on the g meter!)
NickLappos is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 16:40
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,300
Received 523 Likes on 218 Posts
Nick......Landing to a hover doesn't count !
SASless is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 16:46
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never been keen on airbags for cars either, Nick, especially the large airbags standard in US - they are fitted for folks who excercise the "right not to wear a seatbelt" . Would rather column pulled away than have an explosive device going off in my face, at a time when i am trying to think fast...

Just to clarify that's 1.2 to 1.5g total (or 1.1g for the more skilled pilot), so i don't need to add 1g static. A rotor a fraction of the MAUM, designed for -0.5g, would thus easilly handle this. I am curious because ground vehicle designers usually consider 1g +2g/-1g, since driver limits speed by feeling of reduced g.

Mart
Graviman is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 16:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, Grav, the g metter will read 1.5g if you make a horrible landing, thus the airframe "feels" an increase of 50% on the landing loads.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 19:03
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Graviman:



Don't have any of the shots from our guys on my computer. The story is the marines wanted to be impressed, the pilot did some neg Gs, the chalks floated up (unsecured in the cabin) into the cockpit and jammed the collective down, near flat pitch. Had a very significant decent rate in when they hit the ground. It was level at considerable speed, rolled out a bit then hit an earthen wall head on and flipped. The only fatality was the crew chief that did not have his seatbelt on, just a tether. Everyone else, belted into their seats, pretty much walked away.

Also, some L model Blackhawks have the Cockpit Airbags, a buddy had one go off in flight once which dispelled any doubts us A model guys had about their existance!

-Mike
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 01:47
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is incredible, TwinHueyMan! A real statement on survivability in that machine - great pity about crew chief, though. It is amazing how stuff floats about in a reduced g environment, fun but a worry for control jamming.

The real problem with airbags, for cars in particular, is that all the testing is done with the dummy in the nominal driving position. In real accidents folks don't always sit how they're meant to. Some of Murray Mackays talks had cases where folks had injured themselves by having arm across steering wheel when airbag went off, and there have been other out of position fatalities . For my $0.02 an airbag is a last resort, with perhaps cartridge driven collapse of cyclic preffered - as long as trigger mech is reliable in high vibration environment .

Mart

Last edited by Graviman; 4th Apr 2007 at 08:32. Reason: Own flying endeavours trivial compared to most on this forum - no need to mention.
Graviman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.