Drug Testing In Oz
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vic.Aust
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Drug Testing In Oz
Whats your thoughts on the introduction of these tests.
1. Do you think a random 10% is effective in the industry, or is it all that casa can afford?
2. Should it become mandatory at your medical renewals?
Casa has developed their system on the road random breath testing system, how many times have you been in the queue for a test after a few too many drinks and then the police pass you on because they are full, yes escaped again.
What are your views on the methods for detection:
1. Blow and spit on the spot
2. polair pulls you over for a blow and spit - hover parking bays
th
1. Do you think a random 10% is effective in the industry, or is it all that casa can afford?
2. Should it become mandatory at your medical renewals?
Casa has developed their system on the road random breath testing system, how many times have you been in the queue for a test after a few too many drinks and then the police pass you on because they are full, yes escaped again.
What are your views on the methods for detection:
1. Blow and spit on the spot
2. polair pulls you over for a blow and spit - hover parking bays
th
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I dont know anymore
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Luckily I don't know anyone stupid enough to go flying pissed but I am sure they are out there, i'm all for random drug and alcohol testing and wouldn't have a problem with it being introduce into the annual medical exam.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We are tested by our employers at their cost, if randomly tested, does it cost us or is this cost consumed by casa? If negative i would not want to incur another cost, if positive well then anything goes. I like the medical option as it covers 100% of the commercial pilots all the time.
I reckon CASA need to subject themselves to random drug testing. If for no other reason than for introducing the $130 processing fee for a clerk to enter data off a medical form that I paid a doctor $60 to complete. I refused to pay up, so they refused to issue the certificate 
Doesn't change the fact that the doctor reckons I'm medically fit.
p.s. I know of several instances of pilots flying under the influence, or being sent home when the random drug testers show up (to avoid being tested), or who fail to show up for work after a heavy previous night out on the grog
Doesn't change the fact that the doctor reckons I'm medically fit.p.s. I know of several instances of pilots flying under the influence, or being sent home when the random drug testers show up (to avoid being tested), or who fail to show up for work after a heavy previous night out on the grog
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Aus
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the medical option as it covers 100% of the commercial pilots all the time.
ATC staff, Engineers, SPL's, PPL's, CPL's, ATPL's and as mentioned CASA staff. Why not also include all the Sport Aviation licence holders too.
Gatvol
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Random Testing has been going on in the states for some time. It is a pretty good expense for companies, I think a few hundred dollars a shot.
Whats more amazing is some Pilots flunk. Im talking Cocaine, Marijuana etc.
My advice to any moron who is ordered to take a random test and if flying/using drugs. Quit your job, thus its not considered a refusal. and get out of town. Then although your unemployed, you didnt get a positive test and you have time to think about your actions.
Whats more amazing is some Pilots flunk. Im talking Cocaine, Marijuana etc.
My advice to any moron who is ordered to take a random test and if flying/using drugs. Quit your job, thus its not considered a refusal. and get out of town. Then although your unemployed, you didnt get a positive test and you have time to think about your actions.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SouthEast
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CASA Drug testing thoughts....
Wondering if anybody knows any early results of CASA introduced drug testing. Any +ve results, sackings etc... I am aware of some AOC holders being asked to explain to CASA why they should not be suspended due to the lack of DAMP policy etc..
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Testing 100% of pilots at medical will yield absolutely nothing, anyone with a problem just goes cold turkey for the required time. Result 100% negative tests, and negative use for say one month. what about the other eleven months. That would just be an extra unnecessary cost to pilots.
Unfortunately I have seen enough of fatal accident reports of late to prove to anyone who wants to read that alcohol and or marihuana does impare judgement and some drugs do hang around in hair samples for several weeks.
If, it is going to be effective then it certainly should apply to all airspace users. It's insulting enough to have private operators running around competing openly on commercial work, but to have them doing it half gassed is really rubbing it in. And, lets not forget the $2k at least extra cost in setting up a DAMP that we law abiding citizens have to endure for the glory of competing with them.
I've even heard of an R22 AOC operator who on his time off for recreation would fly with a non qualified pilot, starkers except for a parachute and practice jumps onto a moving truck. Did someone mention the courage one gets from rum and grass mixed? No not me.
Random testing could be had without the shiny seat numb brain excercise of setting up a DAMP for those few to whom it applies. such excess paper war futility is not part of any commercial wheeled pursuits such as taxis or trucks.
However one has to admit that random testing has slowed down consumption by motor car drivers.
All that is required is a law prohibiting use and random testing coupled to the mandatory test after any incident/accident. No Paper, no extra cost to aviation.
Unfortunately I have seen enough of fatal accident reports of late to prove to anyone who wants to read that alcohol and or marihuana does impare judgement and some drugs do hang around in hair samples for several weeks.
If, it is going to be effective then it certainly should apply to all airspace users. It's insulting enough to have private operators running around competing openly on commercial work, but to have them doing it half gassed is really rubbing it in. And, lets not forget the $2k at least extra cost in setting up a DAMP that we law abiding citizens have to endure for the glory of competing with them.
I've even heard of an R22 AOC operator who on his time off for recreation would fly with a non qualified pilot, starkers except for a parachute and practice jumps onto a moving truck. Did someone mention the courage one gets from rum and grass mixed? No not me.
Random testing could be had without the shiny seat numb brain excercise of setting up a DAMP for those few to whom it applies. such excess paper war futility is not part of any commercial wheeled pursuits such as taxis or trucks.
However one has to admit that random testing has slowed down consumption by motor car drivers.
All that is required is a law prohibiting use and random testing coupled to the mandatory test after any incident/accident. No Paper, no extra cost to aviation.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NZ Southern Alps
Age: 58
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Topendtorque is exactly right.
If you know a drug test is coming up you can change your behaviour prior to the test, so doing a drug test at the time of the annual medical is nonsense.
It must be random, and there must be serious consequences. Forget about complaining about the expense. If that's a concern then the battle to keep the industry as clean as possible has already been lost.
Gullibell has written what we all know to be true: The reality is there are those that are prepared to drink or take drugs and then fly. In so doing, they put themselves, the aircraft and their passengers at unnecessary and unreasonable risk. Their practices won't stop just because we think it should.
If the argument to deal with this problem is valid then it should be dealt with. Period. Saying that the problem is serious enough to be dealt with and then not doing the all things that are actually necessary to effect a valuable and discernible outcome is illogical.
Maybe the regulators should stop some of the b
t charges they do impose so that funds are available for more meaningful practices.
GP
If you know a drug test is coming up you can change your behaviour prior to the test, so doing a drug test at the time of the annual medical is nonsense.
It must be random, and there must be serious consequences. Forget about complaining about the expense. If that's a concern then the battle to keep the industry as clean as possible has already been lost.
Gullibell has written what we all know to be true: The reality is there are those that are prepared to drink or take drugs and then fly. In so doing, they put themselves, the aircraft and their passengers at unnecessary and unreasonable risk. Their practices won't stop just because we think it should.
If the argument to deal with this problem is valid then it should be dealt with. Period. Saying that the problem is serious enough to be dealt with and then not doing the all things that are actually necessary to effect a valuable and discernible outcome is illogical.
Maybe the regulators should stop some of the b
t charges they do impose so that funds are available for more meaningful practices.GP
