Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Wot, no rumour?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Wot, no rumour?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2006, 07:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wot, no rumour?

'FOD' big enough to 'Cat 5' the main blades of a chopper and not even an inkling of a rumour out of the Capital City?

Very glad to hear no injuries, (apart from laundry bill, I suspect!)
Bertie Thruster is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 12:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell us more
Heliport is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 14:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North of Bristol
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I’m surprised it took this long for someone to mention it here.

Every time I look at the shrapnel that was once a 6’ x 4’ x 1/8” aluminium sign I wonder how on earth the blades stayed in one piece.

For some reason the AAIB team wanted to pay a visit to the scene (despite no injuries) and were in great praise of the helicopters ability to take such a beating with only any real damage limited to the blades. Even after eating the sign which included a 1˝ “ galvanised steel L section bar the blades remained straight and true if not a little worse for wear aft of the main spar.

At least they didn’t have to worry about the sign hitting the tail rotor as it doesn’t have one!!!!

My hats off to the crew who got her down that last 10 feet and the speedy recovery of the cab by the maintenance crew on a Sunday night.


Dr A
dr atkins is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 15:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Blades, Head, hubs, tranny(s), shafting, fans, structure inspections and replacements for "sudden stoppage"?
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2006, 17:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Earth.
Posts: 465
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something to do with G-EHMS by chance?

TiP
TiPwEiGhT is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2006, 04:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of North and East of West!
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it is the G-EHMS blade strike of 29th Oct 05, I thought it had been discussed on here? Unless this is another incident?

I hope not, those poor guys don't have much luck !!
cptjim is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2006, 08:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes this was G-EHMS.
No it wasn't the same incident. This was in the last 2 weeks.
No it wasn't a road sign. This was a section of frontage of a tyre fitting garage that had previously been damaged (cause unknown) and had a very basic fix. This blew off with the downdraught when the Explorer was landing and flew through the blades. The site was I am told approximately 4D in size with no way of telling that the sign wasn't very secure. All the other sections were completely solid in their fixings.
No the crew's judgement was not at fault.
902Jon is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2006, 23:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once is bad luck, time after time suggests a rethink might be required !!!!
Bearintheair is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2006, 08:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oman
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bear me old mate, I think I'm going to have to disagree with you! It's just one of the risks of landing in a congested area. A 4D site is a good size, I think the crew have just been unlucky. Assuming they did a good recce which I'm sure they would have, being HEMS.

The number of congested area landings/takeoffs that they do it would be unusual not to have the odd incident like this. Hitting the stationary roadsign is another matter of course but there but for the grace of God.......

Thank Goodness I'm not doing that stuff any more!
whoateallthepies is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2006, 16:49
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Seems the tail area was quite badly damaged by the mangled debris, flung from the main rotor. Fortuitous perhaps that this was a Notar ship?
Bertie Thruster is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 19:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't help but notice that G-EHMS has not been over London for some time, presumably still due to the June incident. Does anyone have any further info on when she would likely return?

Many thanks..
MB27 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 22:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of North and East of West!
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Judging by the time of year it is, I would hazard a guess that she is at PAS for her annual inspection. Last I heard, they were using a dark colour AS355. (See below) . If that's the case, she should be back very soon......

Perhaps someone could confirm my suspicions.


Last edited by cptjim; 26th Oct 2006 at 23:01. Reason: Kan't speel !! ;0)
cptjim is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 16:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed they are, currently mostly using G-CDLP as pictured. Although a few different helicopters have been used since August. It would seem to not be a short term thing, as the helicopter has been given Ambulance markings, but that's just my thought..

Thanks cptjim..
MB27 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 20:05
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of North and East of West!
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MB27

Thanks cptjim..
......

MB, seems to be the norm to add the Ambulance graphics.

I'm not in the UK at the moment but my sources at LAS have told me it's just an annual, someone please correct me if there is any variation to that.

regards

Jim

Last edited by cptjim; 30th Nov 2006 at 20:07. Reason: Removed bad link
cptjim is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2006, 20:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of North and East of West!
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up G-EHMS back over London.

Just read the latest issue of Police Aviation News and saw that G-EHMS, London HEMS, is back in the skies over London.

The reason for being away for so long was because it was the first airframe in the UK to have the extended tail boom.

I'm also guessing it had the annual inspection at the same time...it'd make sense.

Check out page 11 of PAN.

http://www.policeaviationnews.com/Ac...cember2006.pdf

I'll see if I can get some pics when I'm back in the UK in a few weeks.

Regards

Jim
cptjim is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2007, 15:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of North and East of West!
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pictures of the event!!

These are the pictures of the event as it happened, notice the fod in the rotor disc shown in the first picture...


Notice the sign that was next to the Open 7 days is missing!


Left antenna above the engine cowling has been sheared off.


Waiting to be collected.....you can now see the size of the blue Kwik Fit sign that entered the rotor disc!


Kudos to the crew for getting down safe!!

Safe landings

Jim

EDIT: Forgot to add, the event took place on Sunday 4th June 2006.

Last edited by cptjim; 8th Jan 2007 at 21:31. Reason: See above
cptjim is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2007, 21:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cptjim
Just read the latest issue of Police Aviation News and saw that G-EHMS, London HEMS, is back in the skies over London.

The reason for being away for so long was because it was the first airframe in the UK to have the extended tail boom.
Indeed I first spotted EHMS back at the beginning of December. It would be interesting to know if the extended tail boom really is beneficial.

I can't help but feel that the extended length beyond the stabilizers might lead to an increase in tail boom knocks in tight landings. (Not for EHMS but generally for 902 owners)..

A few pics of the extension at www.kertappa.co.uk/hemsmenu.html in Holborn and Oxford Circus, unfortunately no closeups though.

Also the angle of the tailskid is now much greater than before to cover the extra length.

Thanks..
MB27 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2007, 21:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice Pics


Somebody mentioned 4D ??????????????

2D ????????????????
jivusajob is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2007, 14:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of North and East of West!
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Short video clip

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-OKvrvksfi0
cptjim is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2007, 00:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South of North and East of West!
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AAIB report and recommendation

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/factor200728.pdf
cptjim is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.