Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

SAR: Search & Rescue Ops [Archive Copy]

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

SAR: Search & Rescue Ops [Archive Copy]

Old 6th May 2006, 08:49
  #801 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 510
Indeed. And consider how long each winch cycle would take. 2 pax at a time. 20 (?) pax a load. I don't think that helicopters are the answer to a major disaster at sea unless you can land a Chinook on deck. The primary means of rescue has to be by sea, with helicopters to pick up the badly injured.
Droopystop is offline  
Old 6th May 2006, 16:16
  #802 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: PLANET ZOG
Posts: 305
running in. Sorry for the delay, been otherwise engaged.
These figures are direct from the Westland website.
Cabin length is 8.86ft.
width is 6.89ft.
height is 4.6ft.
A bit of a squeeze are not the words I would use but close to them.
According to the latest "rumour" from MCA/CHC the 139 will only have five pax.seats anyway!!! So much for the recently announced, see previous posts, formation of offshore firefighting teams. They travel in teams of six minimum, plus their kit, to be delivered to the ship all in one lift.
The previously mentioned seats will be easy fit/remove to enable the carriage of stretcher/s. (troopseats?).Presumably they will have legs that fit through holes in the sea tray. That doesn't sound like much of a corrosion problem does it! Still, it will keep the engineers busy and out of the crewroom.
Droopystop.
Agreed. But these incidents rarely happen on days like today and imo the more assets, correctly used and timed, the better.
3D CAM is offline  
Old 6th May 2006, 17:11
  #803 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
Age: 73
Posts: 1,076
A question I have asked but have not yet had fully answered relates to seats and fully compliant airframes like the AW139.

As civvie machines it seems that anyone carried should have [must have?] a fully compliant seat to place themselves on.

At the moment older airframes [pre-JAR] can get away with sitting bums on floors so such as the BK117 can get away with having insufficient headroom for cops in proper stroking seats.

So is it should have or must have?

Picking up survivors from the sea is truly an emergency where you can have bums on the floor for the excess numbers but is transporting firemen to an emergency not likely to be requiring the compliant crashworthy seats for each and every one of them?

I cannot find the finite answer. Any thoughts?
PANews is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.