Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Why aren't we using biodiesel or ethanol?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Why aren't we using biodiesel or ethanol?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 21:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why aren't we using biodiesel or ethanol?

I was watching a show the other day on discovery science, and there was a guy with an ethanol-powered mooney. Basically its corn alcohol, and while we don't have enough to replace our oil supply for cars, you would think that the private/personal aviation market would benefit from this fuel due to its cheap cost and the fact that the changes needed to the fuel system are minute. Also, I'm aware that there are a few diesel aircraft soon to be certified, and wonder why biodiesel isn't catching on as well. Like I said previously, making enough for mass transportation probably isn't possible, but for small airports I don't see why these cheap enviro-friendly fuels aren't used more. http://www.e85fuel.com/index.php
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...7/ai_102090258
svtcobra66 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 22:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think you might find it is because quality of product for use as an aviation fuel cannot be guaranteed!

Ethanol I understand can be very hygroscopic and Biodiesel will wax up filters etc when cold!

Oooooohhh ....... ???
spinwing is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2006, 00:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: US...for now.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ethanol...biodiesel? Funny you should ask. In the current issue of CAR and DRIVER Magazine, columnist Pat Bedard discusses this issue. Let's distill (if you'll pardon the pun) some of what he says.
This is not to say that running cars on ethanol, the alcohol from fermented vegetable matter, is an entirely bad idea... Ethanol packs a large amount of energy into a gallon compared with alternatives such as natural gas, LPG, and hydrogen. It's not as good as gasoline, however; you need about 1.5 gallons of ethanol to drive the same distance as on one gallon of gasoline...
This has always been the problem with ethanol. We pilots are always performing our delicate balancing act, trying to bring along enough fuel with the particular payload. Requiring that we carry more fuel is not going to go over well, except for perhaps flight school ships that stay fairly local.
Ethanol has other problems, too. To ensure good engine starting, it needs to be mixed with gasoline... Moreover, ethanol can't be shipped in pipelines because it picks up water.
Yikes! Will the effect of water in the ethanol be the same as water in the gasoline (i.e. silence from the engine compartment)?

The usually skeptical Bedard hedges a little on biodiesel:
However, used restaurant "grease," known in the recycling trade as yellow grease, or any vegetable oil, can be transformed into a substitute for diesel fuel by a chemical process known as transesterification. It's a good substitute, too, much closer to diesel than ethanol is to gasoline.
Diesels for airplanes simply have not caught on here in the U.S. But I wonder how biodiesel would work in a turbine engine? It would be interesting to find out.

Of course, whichever alternate fuel we use, we're going to have to have a distribution system for it. You sure wouldn't want to take off on a cross-country in an airplane for which there was limited availability of fuel. You might as well have an aircraft powered by an electric motor with a long, long extension cord.

Right now, it would be pretty hard to replace the current distribution system, or even augment it, which is why gasoline is going to be around for a long time for cars. Whether or not we'llbe able to use car gas in our airplanes is the question, especially if the manufacturers want to stop producing avgas. And you know that there are many airplanes that cannot use auto fuel due to their high compression ratios.

"Alternate fuels" is a great theory. The reality of actually implementing them is a whole 'nother subject.
PPRUNE FAN#1 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2006, 00:58
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, but atleast with biodiesel you could just substitute regular diesel or Jet-A. You wouldn't need to use it all the time, so if you can't find a place with biodiesel its not big deal, there are no changes necessary for a diesel engine to run it, its a straight substitute.
svtcobra66 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2006, 06:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Age: 63
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by svtcobra66
True, but atleast with biodiesel you could just substitute regular diesel or Jet-A. You wouldn't need to use it all the time, so if you can't find a place with biodiesel its not big deal, there are no changes necessary for a diesel engine to run it, its a straight substitute.
There can be pitfalls with running biodiesel in engines, it will make normal rubber seals in fuel pumps and fuel hoses swell and eventually fail. Also I do not think it is available at a lower cost than regular diesel ?
007helicopter is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 16:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a lot more to the alternative fuels than you get from the media. there is a big push for them for enviromental reasons and foriegn oil , the other reasons are mostly a load of crap. They are not cheaper, easier, or better. For the most part they are not even as good and they have a lot of unique problems. It takes more energy to process corn to get a fuel product out of it than than you end up with, that is a step backwards. The veggie oil/diesel thing works ok but on a very small scale, and I wouldn't run it in a aircraft I'm going to fly.
corncrasher is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 18:28
  #7 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 430 Likes on 227 Posts
The vapour pressure of a fuel is also an important issue. For example, MOGAS has a higher vapour pressure than AVGAS (=more likely to vapourise) which can be a definite disadvantage at higher ambient temperature and/or increased altitude because it may form a vapour lock in the fuel system. I believe this would also be an issue with ethanol.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 21:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All things considered, it takes more energy to make a gallon of ethanol than a gallon of gasoline, and less energy is produced when that gallon is burned. Ethanol is a wonderful substance when burned in the human body, but not so good when burned in an internal combustion engine.
GLSNightPilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.