Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter makes a precautionary landing in Niagara Falls Canada

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter makes a precautionary landing in Niagara Falls Canada

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Apr 2006, 09:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Niagara Falls, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicopter makes a precautionary landing in Niagara Falls Canada

http://www.nrps.com/news/24Hours/Loc...Helicopter.pdf
Squawk Ident 1200 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 10:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: algarve
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if that was the uk the pilot would be on charges for rule 5 ,endagerment and every thing else the caa would have a field day
lartsa is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 10:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 312
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lartsa, you talk a load of rubbish.
roundwego is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 15:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Yes, you do. That flight is in a restricted area and operated at 2500 feet normally (3000 back) and the route is specifically chosen to have open areas like that. It's actually about as precise as instrument flying.

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 19:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 45
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
better safe than sorry

This makes me glad. A pilot that's safety minded, better safe than sorry. And a police report and company that appricates his attitude. We read so much about pilots that make bad, unresponsible decisions all the time, I want more like this instead.
RotorSwede is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 20:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: In Canada's breastland ...mmmm
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lartsa
if that was the uk the pilot would be on charges for rule 5 ,endagerment and every thing else the caa would have a field day
Why would they???

What's "Rule 5"... for EVERYBODY who know nothing about the CAA and your rules out there???



Just think the right thing was done and the outcome was positive... what else can you ask for???
Galapagos is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 02:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Galapagos - Rule 5 is low flying (not below 500 feet, etc). It's the ICAO stuff as modified and placed into the Air Navigation order.

And you're quite right - job well done!

Phil
paco is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.