Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Legit - kids' science experiment on reaction times

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Legit - kids' science experiment on reaction times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Feb 2006, 05:50
  #1 (permalink)  

Not enough $$$ ...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Legit - kids' science experiment on reaction times

Hi everyone, just thought I'd pass this on, I wouldn't normally but it's kind of fun and it's legitimate, I personally know the girl that sent me the email, and she knows the kid .... you get the idea.... so go ahead and give it a go ...

http://www.rider2rider.com/

My score was 0.22

Hello,
One of the 7th graders here at the school is doing a science project that has to do with reaction time and age. He needs some data. I am forwarding this email [sic] address http://www.rider2rider.com/ so you can try it and support science. It is very simple and will take you less than a minute to complete. Please forward to anyone you think will try it. Let your kids try it too, mine thought it was fun.
wishtobflying is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 05:56
  #2 (permalink)  

Not enough $$$ ...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
practise helps ... 0.206 second time around
wishtobflying is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 06:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

just had 1 go and 0.1844 av. does this mean im younger?
vorticey is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 06:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
0.1842 42 years old
902Jon is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 07:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.156 38

goes
i4iq is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 07:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Steel City
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't work behind our proxy server, bit like me! Even resorted to trying IE
Woodgnome is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 07:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,251
Received 332 Likes on 185 Posts
Interestingly got 0.184 using left mouse click, but consistently over 0.2 using enter key with longer travel.
212man is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 08:19
  #8 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
0.1718

Coming up against the half century. Might have been quicker but I had to pop out for a while..

Had another go, slightly better: 0.16279999999999997

Last edited by ShyTorque; 13th Feb 2006 at 19:42.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 09:16
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Every single attempt was 0.187 maybe not the quickest but does consistency count?
fishboy is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 09:21
  #10 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Enigma
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
44 years old ... 0.225 sec

One foot in the grave time for me !

Now where's my . . . oh, what's it called . . .
Grainger is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 09:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Smile

It appears to have a fatal flaw: the speed and type of connection! Wireless laptop, average well over 1 second.
Broadband desktop using wireless mouse, about 0.3 sec average
Broadband desktop using space bar, about 0.23 sec average

Then again, Desperate Housewives was on TV when I was on the laptop
John Eacott is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 11:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shouldn't be anything to do with connection speed if it's a java script running on the local machine...

How old are you John?
i4iq is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 11:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: IRELAND
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink my score av

av .2124 age 30
Heliseka is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 16:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GOM
Age: 66
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.220 @ 48 yrs young
chuckolamofola is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 16:50
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 798
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
0.258 62 yrs young and closing 9000hrs rotary
oldbeefer is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 16:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: the great white north
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.250 and 33 yrs. will try after a few beers and see if the results on "WKRP in Cincinatti" will hold up.
Fun Police is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 18:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 18 Degrees North
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
0.1812 age 40 2nd attempt

seems as much about practice as age, as I was a lot slower the first time
Camp Freddie is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 21:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by i4iq
Shouldn't be anything to do with connection speed if it's a java script running on the local machine...

How old are you John?
I'm now at work, and have tried this on a number of different computers, with wildly varying results: a wireless mouse or keyboard will not give better than 1 second, whilst a "cable" mouse or keyboard give a reasonably consistent 0.23 seconds. Maybe this is a factor that hasn't been allowed for in the project?

And I'm 57 physical age: no comment on mental age, please .
John Eacott is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2006, 22:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point John - a wireless mouse could offer a delay to the PC and therefore point to a factor that hasn't been accounted for - or it could be that the original hypothesis is correct...
i4iq is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2006, 01:00
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Playing in the sand
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.209, I dont know how solid his theory is cause I'm only 21
mikelimapapa is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.