Video: Austrian EC-135 slope start in snow
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ?
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Video: Austrian EC-135 slope start in snow
This Video is a huge download with 27 MB, but it's worth seeing.
I guess the the machine flipped back because of the soft ground, after unloading the rotor.
I guess the the machine flipped back because of the soft ground, after unloading the rotor.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Here, There and Everywhere!!
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I liked seeing the 'Give it some oooommmppphhhh' idea to get it clear of the snow but what ever happend to one of the rules of slope landings 'Never Turn Your Tail Towards The Slope!'???
R22
R22
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 72
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lucky guy having a fenestron instead of normal tail rotor.
@R22DRIVER That is exactly what he did or do you turn your tail towards the slope ??
Towards the slope means uphill !!
Happy landings
Spencer17
@R22DRIVER That is exactly what he did or do you turn your tail towards the slope ??
Towards the slope means uphill !!
Happy landings
Spencer17
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ?
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Disappointed because this didn't resulted in an accident?
I think the interesting question is how the machine got into this situation.
Nice to see the pilot handeld that situation.
I think the interesting question is how the machine got into this situation.
Nice to see the pilot handeld that situation.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hotzenplotz
I think the interesting question is how the machine got into this situation.
Nice to see the pilot handeld that situation.
Nice to see the pilot handeld that situation.
Fortunately the pilot handled very well this situation !
It seems to be quite a common problem with this operator. A few years ago there was a still image of a similar scenario with the Austrian EMS EC135 at even steeper angle tail first down the embankment of a road. Not sure how that was recovered.
At the time the image was strictly not for publication - too embarassing I guess - just one to secretly whistle over.
Now times have moved on and there is less twitchiness about any suggestion of c of g 'problems' associated with that giant bit of structure around the fenestron.
It does make you wonder if c o g issues are a hidden reason for both Agusta and Bell not taking up with the fan-in-tail after the trials they undertook. The public version is that they did not want to used the design because it was associated with EC ..... it never worried them that Sikorky used a conventional t/r.
At the time the image was strictly not for publication - too embarassing I guess - just one to secretly whistle over.
Now times have moved on and there is less twitchiness about any suggestion of c of g 'problems' associated with that giant bit of structure around the fenestron.
It does make you wonder if c o g issues are a hidden reason for both Agusta and Bell not taking up with the fan-in-tail after the trials they undertook. The public version is that they did not want to used the design because it was associated with EC ..... it never worried them that Sikorky used a conventional t/r.
There is most definitely NO C of G aft issue with the EC135. God knows we sometimes wish it was aft!!!!!
I agree with the aforementioned though. The Fan should have been cleared of all nearby snow before "unsticking".
Shame there was no crash though
[Just joking...].
I agree with the aforementioned though. The Fan should have been cleared of all nearby snow before "unsticking".
Shame there was no crash though
[Just joking...].
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: At home
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T.C. is quite correct in that the EC 135 doesn't have a C of G problem. It has a landing gear position problem.
PANews spoke of the shot of one ship that had landed across a levee or similar and it had pivoted about the rear of the skids and was stuck tail down nearly vertical down the embankment. Probably happened as the pilot stepped out. Great shot but what an embarrassment.
Pity EC can't move the rear cross-tube back another 6 inches or so though as it seems it is currently positioned directly on the C of G. Even picking the bird up with a Tug-a-lug generally requires placing some ballast on the front of the skids to prevent it from tipping backwards.
PANews spoke of the shot of one ship that had landed across a levee or similar and it had pivoted about the rear of the skids and was stuck tail down nearly vertical down the embankment. Probably happened as the pilot stepped out. Great shot but what an embarrassment.
Pity EC can't move the rear cross-tube back another 6 inches or so though as it seems it is currently positioned directly on the C of G. Even picking the bird up with a Tug-a-lug generally requires placing some ballast on the front of the skids to prevent it from tipping backwards.
Last edited by SawThe Light; 8th Feb 2006 at 20:07.
Tigerfish
STL - Try a TLC Heli Lift. What an incredible piece of kit. It seems to lift anything. ( & I am not connected!). Seiously they are worth looking at if you have a lift & shift problem.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SawThe Light
T.C. is quite correct in that the EC 135 doesn't have a C of G problem. It has a landing gear position problem.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: At home
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lima Oscar
I agree that you didn't say it had a problem, just that it "is really on the rear". I was simply agreeing with TC that it didn't. Other than the nasty trait of wanting to sit on its tail on the ground, it is a delightful little machine.
I agree that you didn't say it had a problem, just that it "is really on the rear". I was simply agreeing with TC that it didn't. Other than the nasty trait of wanting to sit on its tail on the ground, it is a delightful little machine.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a thought, if the pilot had test the density of the snow during landing, by "jerking" the collective up and down in a gentle manner, maybe he could avoid the situation.
Cheers
Dick
Cheers
Dick
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SawThe Light
Lima Oscar
I agree that you didn't say it had a problem, just that it "is really on the rear". I was simply agreeing with TC that it didn't. Other than the nasty trait of wanting to sit on its tail on the ground, it is a delightful little machine.
I agree that you didn't say it had a problem, just that it "is really on the rear". I was simply agreeing with TC that it didn't. Other than the nasty trait of wanting to sit on its tail on the ground, it is a delightful little machine.
I always wished EC had moved the skid 6 inches rearward, it would have stopped it appearing in the camera lens!
Artist formerly known as FNW.
Artist formerly known as FNW.
Last edited by FloaterNorthWest; 9th Feb 2006 at 17:15.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austria
Age: 74
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EC-135 landing an take-off
Hi folks,
this is Gilbert, the Austrian EC135 pilot (shown in action on the video)!
Of course, I did! I also told the HEMS-crew to get out and report, wether the snow-skids where fully on the ground and how the surface is. He reported: "both skids well on ground, surface is hard"!
I shut down and when the rotor stopped, I went out normally. Just when my feet touched the ground, I heard a "sort of scratching" noise and the EC sunk rearwards, until the Fenestron-housing stopped it!
Actually the surface was frozen hard, but there was sort of powder-snow down under. The snow-skids would sink, including a greater piece of the hard surface!
Never experienced this before - flying EC135 since 1997 in mountainous areas of Austria.
I have checked the situation of the Fenstron eagerly and decided, NOT to dig it out because I was afraid, it could sink even deeper?
We also tried to pull the aircraft into it`s normal attitude - no way!
The "recovery" maneuver was not a real problem - despite I should have made it a bit less harsh!? No limit on mast-moment, no uncommon feeling - she moved a bit too fast but, well, that was it! (No such training ever before!)
Losses: the tail-bumper was slightly damaged, replaced and a special-check was carried out. No further damages.
Reliable aircraft? I guess....
Kind regards,
old Gil.
this is Gilbert, the Austrian EC135 pilot (shown in action on the video)!
......if the pilot had test the density of the snow during landing, by "jerking" the collective up and down in a gentle manner, maybe he could avoid the situation. ....
Of course, I did! I also told the HEMS-crew to get out and report, wether the snow-skids where fully on the ground and how the surface is. He reported: "both skids well on ground, surface is hard"!
I shut down and when the rotor stopped, I went out normally. Just when my feet touched the ground, I heard a "sort of scratching" noise and the EC sunk rearwards, until the Fenestron-housing stopped it!
Actually the surface was frozen hard, but there was sort of powder-snow down under. The snow-skids would sink, including a greater piece of the hard surface!
Never experienced this before - flying EC135 since 1997 in mountainous areas of Austria.
I have checked the situation of the Fenstron eagerly and decided, NOT to dig it out because I was afraid, it could sink even deeper?
We also tried to pull the aircraft into it`s normal attitude - no way!
The "recovery" maneuver was not a real problem - despite I should have made it a bit less harsh!? No limit on mast-moment, no uncommon feeling - she moved a bit too fast but, well, that was it! (No such training ever before!)
Losses: the tail-bumper was slightly damaged, replaced and a special-check was carried out. No further damages.
Reliable aircraft? I guess....
Kind regards,
old Gil.