Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Poor Oil Companies

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Poor Oil Companies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Feb 2006, 21:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poor Oil Companies

Article in 'Scotsman' newspaper. It would appear that the combined profits of BP and Shell are still not sufficient to spend money on increasing the safety of offshore flying. They only made £25billion last year.
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=190492006
bondu is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 21:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: inside
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noooooo, this can't be
mrwellington is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 21:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Marsh
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shell and BP are spending money in the GOM for increased safety. Contracts spec new aircraft like S-92s and EC-135s, factory maintenance training, duty times, TCAS, EGPWS, HEELS and the list goes on.
S92mech is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 22:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 517 Likes on 215 Posts
Anyone care to bet how long (if ever ) it takes Chevron to do the same thing? I will bet a dog dropping to a dough nut and you can hold the stakes in yer mouth....they will never do so as long as cheap is cool. Escravos will never see a light twin with IFR capability....that is a no brainer!
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2006, 01:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Playing in the sand
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not that I know anything about the offshore industry, but I've already read several complaints about safety on this forum. Seems like there should be an international union of offshore helicopter pilots. A worldwide strike would cripple the greedy oil companies, therefore they would be forced to give into safety demands. In 2005 alone, exxonmobil made $36 billion in profit, chevron $27 billion, shell $23 billion and bp $19 billion. Even with record profits two years in a row they couldn't spend 250k pound to fund safety advances? Thats bull! I've read that some individual companies have unions, but it seems to me that they need to unite on a larger scale to really have the affect that is needed.
mikelimapapa is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2006, 02:35
  #6 (permalink)  

Not available in stores.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eye of the Storm
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I'm not mistaken, MikeLimaPapa, the pilots for one of the GOM offshore operators (Air Log, I believe) did unionise some years back. However, I also believe they have since been de-certified.
HowlingWind is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2006, 03:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Being a relative newcomer, this is probably going to sound really naive - but here goes, anyway...

Is there no way to lobby the FAA to establish minimums for the industry?
i4iq is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2006, 04:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 517 Likes on 215 Posts
No matter how interested individual employees might be, or what assistance a manufacturer offers, or how insistent a certificating authority might be — none of these factors will have a significant effect on safety without support from top management.


Howling...

Air Log is union...still is...and from all indications is going to remain so.

PHI is union...CBA under negotiation for two years now...fight coming.

ERA is non-union but rumours are efforts being made to organize them exist.

Air Methods....large EMS operator is now union...CBA being negotiated....fight coming.

Fort Rucker Instructor pilots are union now....

The GOM unions are now participating with IALPA and have gotten active in the safety committee there.

PHPA is beginning to grow and is getting active in the safety field by representing "pilots" on the committees.

A bit of searching and you can find press releases and magazine articles on the web that discuss some of the latest safety initiatives that industry groups in the USA and Canada are developing. Meetings including operators, the FAA, NTSB, Oil Company Safety Reps, and others are beginning to become more frequent and involved in improving safety.

The latest issue of Autorotate Magazine reports the outcome of the American Helicopter Society International Safety Seminar in Montreal back in September. Other trade journals have articles about that and other meetings.
SASless is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.