Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

machine with the most power

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

machine with the most power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 11:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Playing in the sand
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
machine with the most power

hey rotorheads,

Im sure this will spark some debate, like most threads in the forum, but I was wondering which helicopter out there has power to burn? From what I read, the Gulfstream V in the fixed wing world has more power than it knows what to do with, so what would be the fling wing equivalent?
mikelimapapa is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 11:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It must be the Chinook - an awesome machine. With full (airframe) fuel and about 25 pax it is still able to hover IGE on one engine on a standard UK day. Usually it bulked out inside before reaching MAUM (except with some special loads) and really only reaches MAUM with an underslung load.

Always a joy to fly, just the lifestyle that sucks.
crabbbo is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 12:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 514 Likes on 215 Posts
Empty Chinook...well down on fuel....confined area takeoff..."Clear Left, Right, Overhead!"....Thrust Lever smoothly to the top...left pedal about half way to the stop...VSI pegged....vertical to 3000' AGL.....pulling about two G's till the lever is reduced...and people brag about good sex!
SASless is online now  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 17:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nah...try an empty Mil Mi-26 ,which holds the world record for a windmill climbing to altitude and has real powerful engines ,and a cabin that you can load a Chinook into.
Having seen the pictures of one recovering a CH-47D from a high altitude crash in Afghanistan makes you wonder why the US Army is so determined to waste money developing a new HLH with the same payload !
heli1 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 17:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Escrick York england
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
na KA32 goes up like a rocket nearly makes your nose bleed
md 600 driver is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 18:58
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Playing in the sand
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not quite what i had in mind

Thanks for the replies guys, 3000 fpm must be an awesome ride! But I was thinking more along the lines of your typical civilian pax helos. The nicest machine I've seen up close was a pristine EC135 that refueled at my school. Instead of taking off on the runway, he requested a fly-by of the school and must of been doing at least 100 kts down the taxiway. Just as he pasted the gawking students, he pulled back and shot up like a rocket!
mikelimapapa is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 19:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bymehere
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The EC135 needed forward speed and a big pull back on the cyclic to register a climb??
flimflam is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 20:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Durham, NC USA
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The new AB-139 should be a real leaper. It weighs in somewhere near 13,200 lbs and has 3360 ESHP for takeoff.
Jack Carson is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 23:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
India's re-engined Lama - the Cheetal - should also be interesting: 1,100 shp lifting only 4,300 lbs.

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 23:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA (Naturalized but bits still British!)
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CH54B (S64F in disguise)
7166.5 ft per minute (I think, ran outof fingers....)
Sub-class : E-1 (Helicopters)
Category : General
Group 2 : turbine
Time to climb to a height of 3 000 m : 1 min 22.2 sec
Date of flight: 12/04/1972
Pilot: John C. HENDERSON (USA)
Course/place: Stratford, CT (USA)
Rotorcraft:
Sikorsky CH-54-B (2 JFTD12-5A, 4 800 hp each)
PT6ER is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2006, 08:07
  #11 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
The S-70 Blackhawk is a pretty impressive heli too (ours were civvie registered with the -C engines).

21 pob, 2 hrs fuel and single engine OGE hover was nice to have. So was the 144%/144% Tq (max transient power) vertical takeoff performance. The quickest elevator in the south!

The cabin load of RAF Wessex pilots we demo'd it to didn't stop talking about it for weeks afterwards. Mind you, they used to takeoff along the runway, we took off over the fence and almost pinned 'em to their seats!
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 4th Feb 2006, 18:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: landdownunder
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your spot on PT6ER nothing will beat a Crane for power to burn and rate of climb even at VNE it will smoke a 234 or any other helicopter from a standing start it will beat a F4 to 10000ft.
Granny is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.