Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Autorotation - using cyclic during the run on....

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Autorotation - using cyclic during the run on....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2006, 23:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cage wheel
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Autorotation - using cyclic during the run on....

I may have asked this queston a while back, but I have forgotten what was said.

When on the auto run on and the T/R authority starts to run out and it's difficult to keep the aircraft straight, is it desirable depending on envronment and surface, to use cyclic to follow into the turn to keep the forces all going in the same direction ?


Thanks

UH
unhappyhamster is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 03:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
In my experience(Gazelles) I had no problems keeping it straight during the run-on.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 04:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: canada
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say that use of cyclic after an autorotative landing will have no effect. Rotor RPM has been consumed to cushon the landing, and there wouldn't be much thrust available from the disk afterwards (the same reason you aren't getting any directional control from the tail rotor).

It is important to let friction with the ground do it's job to slow the helicopter, lowering the collective slowly after touchdown . It may be instinctive to pull aft on the cyclic to slow the aircraft down, but this can lead to the main rotor striking the tailboom. It is also automatic for us to have a full bootful of pedal applied during the last portion of the run on, trying to keep the nose straight, which doesn't hurt at all.
rotorfloat is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 06:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unhappyhamster

I'm not sure what speed you are running on at during your autos, and how long your run on continues for as a result, but I would seriously try flaring off some of your speed before you touch down. You shouldn't be anywhere near running out of T/R authority before you are fully "landed".
Teefor Gage is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 06:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Unhappyhampster:
Two things:

I agree with T4 gauge that your run on speed shouldn't be such that you're still having to drive the cab around the ground while TR authority is running out.

Secondly - don't even think of using cyclic to manouvre the head after the Nr and TR starts to decay. You will not be in control of the rotor head at this stage and your inputs will only exacerbate the tip path plane, possibly leading to banging droop stops at least or chopping the tail off at worst
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 07:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KPHL
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It depends...

Different techniques for different types. If you have a teetering rotor or low effective hinge offset then with little to zero lift being generated, the cyclic inputs will not be very effective. Also, with reduced Nr small cyclic inputs can lead to surprisingly large flapping amplitudes. With a rigid or semi rigid head, the cyclic may be effective, but whether it makes things better for you would be dependant on many things.

Your aircrew manual, etc. should specify what the best technique is. Don't try anything else.

T4 Gauge: run on speed and t/r authority are not directly linked. T/R authority would be more affected by relative wind and Nr.

MightyGem: did you try eols in Gazelles with relative winds from both sides?

Matthew.
Matthew Parsons is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 07:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matthew Parsons

I wasn't suggesting that T/R authority is linked to run on speed, but implying that the NR decay experienced during a lengthy run on would give rise to reduction in T/R auth. Relative wind etc also need to be considered - something that unhappyhamster didn't alude to in his original post. Maybe he was landing on a runway with a reasonable x-wind component. etc
Teefor Gage is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 08:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a standard or normal auto at training weights, in normal DA with an appropriate touch down surface, there should be no reason to run out of pedal authority during touch down. That is, you should generally still have some authority (pedal remaining) until you have stopped. During the run on phase, cyclic and collective should be frozen, with the cyclic in a central position appropriate to touch down attitude (generally level). Direction of attention should be on the far distance (the horizon) to allow the aircraft to track straight (maintain heading).

Yaw control emergencies on the other hand may require some cyclic steering. But that’s not what was asked.
griffinblack is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 11:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
Leave the cylic alone, steer it with the pedals, do not push the lever down let friction slow the ac - progressively lower lever until she stops
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2006, 09:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
MightyGem: did you try eols in Gazelles with relative winds from both sides?
Too long ago to remember, but I'm sure that it won't have been dead on the nose at all times.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2006, 12:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't use full aft cyclic in a Hughes 500 or you might lose your tailboom - the MR blades tend to flap down and can cut the thing in half.
rotornut is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2006, 13:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,370
Received 659 Likes on 291 Posts
In a heavy Gazelle (AAC not RAF or RN) it was not uncommon to get to the left pedal stop during the run on but only because you had used more Nr to cushion the landing.
I agree that a faster run on, especially if a little too much lever is used to cushion, can leave you with forward speed and little Nr left to steer with - then you do need to lower the lever a bit to let friction do its job and accept the yaw.
On the Gazelle, the usual result of waggling the cyclic around during the run on was hitting the frange and having the p*ss taken in the crewroom later.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 20:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wessex
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Autorotation - using cyclic during run-on

Gazelle is a piece of piss. Try the MD 520N then you will know about running out of T/R authority with the pedal against the stop with 10 knots through the disc and a short run-on!
Spiritrider is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.