Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Lama accident in dense fog

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Lama accident in dense fog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th January 2006 | 10:49
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Desert Rat
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

Referring on one of the previous posts on the difficulty on selling Lamas these days. Frankly, I think it still a good workhorse for the mountains. Crashing em to get rid of them on purpose does happen but in this case, and I agree with tecpilot, that dude had gethomeitis to get his heini kicked upon return.

Did he survive? Is there a weather minima policy in place? And on top of it, the already bruised image of being a helicopter pilot just adds to the list of well wishers at AustroControl and the Department of Transportation. Welcome to the stringent world of operating under JAR regulations.
alouette is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 13:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: suffolk uk
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

I agree with SHortshaft, you never know the whole story and it may have been the better option. It can be done perfectly safely with two crew, the secret is to have the handling pilot facing into the slope so he never, ever looses reference. Trying to follow a moving tagret downhill will always be dangerous; pity no one taught the poor guy the proper technique!
uncle ian is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 14:11
  #23 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 1
From: Switzerland
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

Uncle Ian I never thought of going downhill backwards. That would have been a lot better but was this legal in any case? Weather minima and low level flying? I don't know anything about the JAR's but I would assume it was not legal at all.
Bitmonx is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 14:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: suffolk uk
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

Hi Bitmonx, I've done it in a military context where the better option was definately to vacate the current location and low flying mandatory but I've also done it in civilian contexts where IMHO the (in UK) 500ft rule does not preclude flying at,say, 10ft over open country......question is how do you know that you are no closer than 500ft to any etc...... when viz is 150ft. I believe I've always been legal......but I would say that, wouldn't I?
uncle ian is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 14:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 814
Likes: 1
From: Iceland
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

but was this legal in any case?
Uncontrolled airspace = clear of cloud and in sight of surface.
Aesir is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 15:07
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 506
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

Uncontrolled airspace = clear of cloud and in sight of surface.
Clear of clouds and in sight of surface -correct
but have forgotten Aesir
the fully rule
"Clear of clouds and in sight of surface, Flight visibility may be reduced to 800 m for short periods during daylight, if the helicopter is manoeuvred at a speed that will give adequate opportunity to observe other traffic and any obstacles in time to avoid a collision"

Sorry, german ( and in this case also JAR) law!

Last edited by tecpilot; 10th January 2006 at 15:26.
tecpilot is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 17:14
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 814
Likes: 1
From: Iceland
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

Flight visibility may be reduced to 800 m for short periods during daylight
I believe this is a JAR-OPS 3 requirement.

I doubt that he was operationg under JAR-OPS (Public transport) at the time?
Aesir is offline  
Old 10th January 2006 | 17:41
  #28 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

I believe this is a JAR-OPS 3 requirement.

I doubt that he was operationg under JAR-OPS (Public transport) at the time?
Not quite right...

"Clear of clouds and in sight of surface, Flight visibility may be reduced to 800 m for short periods during daylight, if the helicopter is manoeuvred at a speed that will give adequate opportunity to observe other traffic and any obstacles in time to avoid a collision"
is valid for any pilot operating under VFR in Germany. That rule is based on the German LuftVO app. 5.

Spunk
Spunk is offline  
Old 11th January 2006 | 11:24
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Asia
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

Hi Spunk (and others),

Interesting post! I am guessing that as you can quote from the German regulations you have linguistic tendencies.

Perhaps you can let us know if there has been any preliminary report issued by the German authorities that might shed more light, correct or amplify, what has already been posted on this thread regarding this accident?

Does anyone know of the health of the pilot? I can only hope that regardless of our views as to his part in this tragedy we all wish him a speedy recovery!

SH
SHortshaft is offline  
Old 11th January 2006 | 22:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 1
From: UK
Re: Lama accident in dense fog

And a speedy departure....from the company I hope?
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 8th February 2006 | 10:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
It's hard to believe that an idt destroys a Lama helicopter.
Why didn'd he do that to a ron.
I love Lama's.

Happy landings
Spencer17
spencer17 is offline  
Old 8th February 2006 | 13:41
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Europe/US
Regarding the flight vis of 800m, thats at the discretion of the local ATCS....JAR OPS-3 / Class G.......yadah yadah!yadah!

I like the wait for better WX, possible quick shag.....makes more sense!
Helipolarbear is offline  
Old 8th February 2006 | 18:40
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 1
From: UK
Press on itis AND ego.
Thomas coupling is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.