Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Police heli engine problems?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Police heli engine problems?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2001 | 02:05
  #1 (permalink)  
StevieTerrier
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Police heli engine problems?

There seems to be an awful lot of reported engine problems, mainly chips and oil press problems on Police helis using the Alison 250 engines (BO105 / AS355). Is this pure coincidence, or are these helis being abused in some way - maybe "scramble" starts being employed hence no 1 minute warm-up period being oberved? And that question goes to.....the Plod pilots.
 
Old 7th May 2001 | 02:35
  #2 (permalink)  
PurplePitot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Nope. It,s just that Allison 250s are cr*p
 
Old 7th May 2001 | 07:54
  #3 (permalink)  
Cyclic Hotline
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

A slight correction here, they are Rolls-Royce 250's now.

They are still crap!

Why are they still suffering from the same problems as 30 years ago?
 
Old 7th May 2001 | 15:50
  #4 (permalink)  
widgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

you don't hear to much about the 250-c47 that is in the 407 , how are they holding up ?. Are most of the problems with the C20 and C28 models ?
 
Old 7th May 2001 | 22:28
  #5 (permalink)  
StevieTerrier
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

PurplePitot / Cyclic Hotline. You may think the Alison is crap, but that doesn't really answer my question,sorry! I have flown the same 206 for 7 years, nearly 1,000 hrs with only one chip event ( which proved spurious anyway) So maybe my question should have been "Why is the Alison engine crap in the police role in the UK, but OK in my (and many other people's) JetRanger(s)?" Lack of or incorrect maintenance maybe? Is too much expected of it in the BO105 / AS355 fit?
Come on boys, at least when Lu calls the R22 crap, he backs it up with (his version of ) the facts. Letsbe hearing from you
 
Old 8th May 2001 | 01:15
  #6 (permalink)  
psyclic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

ST: How much of that 1000hours was in OGE hover at near MAUW? The squirrels get shagged, that's why the engines are knackered.
 
Old 8th May 2001 | 15:32
  #7 (permalink)  
CTD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Jeez guys, this is starting to sound like that ridiculous justhelicopters.com site......this is crap, that’s crap......I thought this one had a little more substance.

I have spent the lion's share of 7000 hrs at the top of an 'OGE hover at near MAUW' with GEs, Pratts, Turbomecas, Lycomings, and Allisons spinning behind me or overhead in various forms, and have seen them all go for ****. I have seen 206Bs with 20,000 hrs which have never experienced an engine problem, and a brand new 350BA (<300hrs TT) spit the engine out the back. In the vast majority of cases, the cause can be traced to poor operational habits, or substandard maintenance or overhaul practices. Of course there are exceptions.... early LTS-101s for example, early C-28s, even the beloved Arriel has seen some untimely spur gear failures which have been going on for quite some time (first one I saw was 93, and it's still happening today re: LA police).

Point is, rarely does a properly operated, maintained or overhauled engine fail. When they do, it's usually a 'one-of', and not a fundamental design flaw.

Stevie, as you said, the 1 minute 'warm-up' period is indeed that, a period to reduce thermal stress on the engine before running it up, and not a generator or battery limitation as is sometimes believed. Most other manufacturers have some form of restriction on this as well.

For widgeon: The C-47 seems to be holding up very well, as is its brother, the C40 in the B430. The C-47 experienced some early FADEC issues which were traced to a wiring harness vendor. Otherwise the first six years has been remarkably good, with most overhauls resulting in only minor repair work.
 
Old 9th May 2001 | 03:19
  #8 (permalink)  
Thomas coupling
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I tend to agree with psyclic, CTD, now that I've heard that other alisons operating in less strenuous circumstances don't suffer 'chips' and other engine headaches as much as police alisons, perhaps there is substance to it. It is common in this industry to read about compressor blades / chip lights / combiner gearbox debris playing up on the C250F. I couldn't finger maintenance in our instance...perhaps it's me!!!!!!!

------------------
Thermal runaway.
 
Old 9th May 2001 | 15:20
  #9 (permalink)  
CTD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I'm sure you're right that a harder working engine will suffer more than one which is screaming all day. TC, do you fly a TwinStar? It's been a while since I flew a 355 but it seems to me that while operating with both cooking they're not working too hard, certainly not as hard as one works in most single applications.

I worked on a base for years that ran up to 9 H500s over 1000 hrs/yr each, mostly doing heavy sling and precision longline work. We had one engine failure in 10 years, and that was a compressor which let go 18 hrs out of overhaul.

Anyway, I'm not into defending Allison, but in reality, there are far more of them floating around than anything else right now, so one is bound to hear of more problems.

Have a safe one, no matter what you're in.

 
Old 9th May 2001 | 23:35
  #10 (permalink)  
FLIR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Dear All,
Have been flogging around in a 1989 BO105 - 11000 hours + on the frame,
for a few years now. All of the flights were Police related, and have to say that the one minute warm up - although a great idea, does tend to knock the rapid response that plod require. It's a sad fact that some types of operation do tend to knack the hardware somewhat, but we seem to limit our 'chips' with the Facet filter setup, apart from rebuild debris that is. The old 105 did tend to leak some, but providing the labyrinth seals were well run in, and the weather above zero (c) the "rapid start" and take off could be performed ok. The problems you have heard of with the C20B are correct, but they must be understood in the context of the job the craft is being put to.
 
Old 10th May 2001 | 07:26
  #11 (permalink)  
407 Driver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I also agree with CTD.
I have 10,000 hours + on the C18, C20, C20B, and C47 with very few problems. I typically have an aircraft assigned to the base for 2000 to 4000 hours, and have always reached the Alison (RR) TBO's.

I can't say this about my Ariel time, as I have seen one of those come apart...luckily I was very near the ground.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.