Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Strathclyde Police Helicopter Accident

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Strathclyde Police Helicopter Accident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2002, 23:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Age: 71
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Strathclyde Police Helicopter Accident

Sad to report that there has been a forced landing involving this helicopter. Understand it to be the EC135 operated by Bond Air Services. Media reports all 3 occupants injured, but 2 have left hospital after treatment.

The best source I have found is at the BBC website -

<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/scotland/newsid_1826000/1826661.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/scotland/newsid_1826000/1826661.stm</a>

I wish all concerned a rapid and complete recovery.

Accurate details will have to wait on the usual reports, but the photo on the above website suggests a pretty heavy landing.
Helinut is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2002, 23:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post



Amazing that the pilot and one observer received only minor injuries.. .Best wishes to the second observer for a speedy recovery.
Heliport is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2002, 01:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Great White North eh!
Age: 84
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

I certainly wish them well.

If the initial BBC report is to believed, and the second picture on the BBC site is the cab involved; my question is, "Why was it not fitted with WSPS?" The big transmission (grid) lines are the ones that are usually marked on charts; however, it is the dinky little farm/residential line that will get you everytime when you are IFR(I follow roads) looking for the auto crash / lost child, etc.

I hope that this wasn't the case but it is a thought for the OPS people.
aspinwing is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2002, 04:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

We dont use/need the wire strike warner because we don't operate at those heights for police work (Different story for HEMS). Usual score: risk management/weight/cost penalties etc.

I think you'll find this wasn't due to a wire strike anyway...

I suspect they walked away from this mainly because of the crashworthiness of the EC135. I don't think a squirrel would have coped as well. <img src="eek.gif" border="0">
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2002, 04:40
  #5 (permalink)  

Just Dropped In
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: um....er.....
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I would just like to say that my thoughts and prayers are with the crew, their famillies & all concerned with the Strathclyde ASU.
Roofus is online now  
Old 20th Feb 2002, 05:01
  #6 (permalink)  
widgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

On the Dart stand they had obstacle avoidance radar also picked up info on the Dornier Hellas laser system. Any word on what caused the accident yet ?.
 
Old 20th Feb 2002, 13:25
  #7 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Hmmm, sobering picture!

In my day that kind of damage was called a crash, not a heavy landing.

I'm very glad to hear that the occupants are not too badly hurt, and hope that they make quick and full recovery.

For those who followed the thread 'Police Observers - crew or pax?' I wonder where Strathclyde's authority stand on the question? Proper cover, or hiding behind lawyers.

This further accident reinforces the need for you folks to get a final ruling on where you will stand after the unthinkable.
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2002, 19:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

ArkRoyal: Strathclyde are probably the leading authority on the crew Vs pax issue, from the days in 1990 when they last had a crash and there was a House of Lords ruling on the subject.

[ 20 February 2002: Message edited by: Thomas coupling ]</p>
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2002, 21:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Just like to echo Roofus's post. Get well soon boys. Grapes and card in the post!

From a fellow EC135'er
PushTo Shock is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2002, 15:33
  #10 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

TC

Indeed there was, and it went against the observers. The same ruling has lengthened the process of settlement since the East Mids accident in Oct 1998.

There will be other incidents in the future, and it is up to you police and medic aircrew with your unions to get this question answered once and for all.
Arkroyal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.