Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

BlackHawk Crash

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

BlackHawk Crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Dec 2005, 13:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
BlackHawk Crash

Ran across this one today....don't know if it has been posted before...but interesting shot of a crash.

http://media.putfile.com/Accident---...litary-Helicop
SASless is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 13:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never saw that, ouch! Looks like a main rotor problem, causing a massive ilateral vibration, shaking the tail off. Do you see the first two wiggles of the fuselage back and forth before it fails?
NickLappos is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 13:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Yes.....she wiggled....but you also notice the second bird spins right and crashes as well. I would bet it was downed by shrapnel from the bird in trail that loses the tail boom.
SASless is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 13:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They meshed rotors, SASless. That was a .95 rotor disk separation. That is the Australian accident. The second ac also starts to lose its tail.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 13:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Wild West... and Oz
Posts: 866
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Didn't the Australian crash with the SAS happen at night? or is this another one?
BigMike is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 14:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Alba
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you watch the tail of the second aircraft coming into shot, you can see the contact between the first's main rotors and the second's tail section.

It appears number two came in too tight and spun his tail into the other rotor.
UwantME2landWHERE! is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 14:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you will find it was a US Army accident whilst on Ex Purple Star in the mid ninties. The Aussie one you refer to was a very similar accident but at night.

US Army collision

Aussie Blackhawk collision

Spookily, the accidents were 6 days apart.

Last edited by wg13_dummy; 18th Dec 2005 at 15:03.
wg13_dummy is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 15:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UwantME2landWHERE!

Its tricky to tell cause from effect. The second aircraft (on the left of the video) also underwent exactly what the other did. Both had main rotor strikes, and the tails wiggle the same way.
When a few feet of the main blade is lost the massive imbalance shakes the wole aircraft (and can't be seen on this video.) The massive vibration is close enough to the main rotor 1/revolution frequency that it literally shakes the aircraft apart. That tail wiggle is the first lateral bending mode of the fuselage, and is the effect of the blade strike. I don't believe the tail was struck by anything.

Your dog knows how to find the first bending mode of a captured creature, that's why he has the instinctive lateral head shake. This shake excites the creature's natural frequency, and breaks its neck, so the dog doesn't have to do as much work to get lunch. Notice how the dog's shake frequency changes with the weight of the toy, he finds the natural frequency, and dwells there. You do that too when you pick up a long stick and snap it by shaking it from one end.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 21:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 515
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
96 Crash

I think one of the factors involved in the 96 Ft Campbell crash was a change in the lz at the last minute.

The crews had practised previously but some strap hangar decided to make a change to the program. Not the cause but certainly a contributing factor.
havoc is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2005, 22:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Nick, it was not the 96 Australian Black Hawk crash. wg13 and havoc are correct. - Trust me I know
S70IP is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2005, 04:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 515
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
Found this link

Interesting but somber website,

http://www.armyaircrews.com/index.html
havoc is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2005, 07:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Alba
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nick I stand corrected.

Initially when viewing the video, it appeared, to me, that the second aircraft was yawing in the opposite direction. However, I now see that both aircraft were on the same profile.
I see what you’re saying, determining ‘cause from effect’, tricky!

Although I will continue my propensity for rash decision and snap judgments!
'Never let it be said that I allowed cold, hard fact or logic get in the way of considered opinion!'
UwantME2landWHERE! is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.