Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Oilmen’s concern over emergency helicopters

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Oilmen’s concern over emergency helicopters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Feb 2002, 00:07
  #21 (permalink)  
Nick Lappos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

heedm,. .You are right, in fact the issues are much more than two sided!

Carrying "extra" anything is always going to mean that you carry less of some other things. It is grand to see how the marketplace values the various balances we attempt. For the user, that extra engine carries lots of advantages, but also costs more to buy, insure and operate. The EH is estimated to cost about 35% more to operate per mile than roughly comparable two engine helicopters. I'll wage that a one engine helicopter is better yet in terms of pure economics (but they are not permitted above 20,000 pounds, unless equipped with fewer than 10 seats).

All being said, more power to hover means less fuel available to go somewhere, in the inexerable laws of design.

In another thread, the Gnome equipped Wessex is lauded for its awesome hover power, and it similarly has greatly reduced range as a result.

You buy what you need, we'll build them. It works just that simply!
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.