Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Dual engine failure in CV-22

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Dual engine failure in CV-22

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2005, 01:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dual engine failure in CV-22

Here's a couple of links.

http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/1025-04.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...102501511.html
ron-powell is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2005, 13:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North of Somewhere
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to note:

"Darcy said the CV-22 -- a prototype that was not equipped with the de-icing equipment that will be standard on operational aircraft -- began flying on instruments after hitting severe thunderstorms and icing conditions."

DUH! However, with moisture evident in the air and at low temps, they shouldn't have been flying there anyway!

I'm sure our good friend Mr. Lappos is willing to give his $0.02 on why Sikorsky products ... errrr helicopters in general ... are superior!
and Tompkins is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2005, 13:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In the interests of fairness, given the thread title, the second link includes:

...but the U.S. Navy denies the engines stalled or that the crew was in danger.
BossEyed is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2005, 00:22
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bosseyed:

Yeah, I should have thought through the thread title. Maybe a question mark at the end?

Anyway, your "fairness" point is why I included both links.

Ron Powell
ron-powell is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2005, 19:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on guys give them a chance, can you imagine what was said when the first helicopter took to the sky's. When tilt rotor aircraft start coming good it will be a great day for us as we can finaly say that the only advantage of fixed wing aircraft I.E. the speed thing is no longer an issue.
CRAZYBROADSWORD is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2005, 20:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I sat through a brief on tilt rotors and was informed by some engineering type boffin that, tilt rotor craft were the way forward due to the faster airspeeds they can achieve and that the approach angle to a HLS can be steeper. It kind of spoiled it when he went on to explain that vortex ring happens at a higher airspeed with lesser rates of descent making steeper approaches more dangerous. Tilt rotors: definately something there but when Westlands are producing a rotor with a tip speed of Mach 1+, allowing helos to travel at 200kts+ do we really need them?

"Lifting!"

AD
Above Datums is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2005, 17:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UAE
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Above Datums:

He should have said that, 'vortex ring state happens at GREATER rates of descent in Tiltrotors' compared to helicopters.
(ask Nick)
Projected top speed for the BA609 is 293kts.
21st Century is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2005, 18:12
  #8 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,580
Received 438 Likes on 231 Posts
Forget the icing problem, that can be designed / de-iced out.

This is the thing to be more concerned about from the first report:

"In the event of a single engine failure, V-22 flight procedures require the pilot to transition to aircraft mode".

And if this isn't possible, such as on take-off from a restricted area?

Any info published yet on the Performance A / Class 1 requirements?

This aircraft CAN'T replace helicopters because it is specialised / optimised for the higher speed envelope, not the low speed environment where true helicopters will remain superior. It is like asking a greyhound to pull a heavy dog sleigh - it doesn't have the low speed grunt to replace the husky.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2005, 10:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
21st

umm come to think of it he did, my bad!
Above Datums is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.