Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Battersea Barge?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Battersea Barge?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th January 2002 | 20:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Question Battersea Barge?

Whatever happened to the idea of a floating platform Helipad on the Thames?
The idea fascinated me but I lost track of the plans and it obviously has not happened?
Any ideas as to why it didn't go ahead?

More to the point - anyone know what we'd have to do to set one up, and have you got a big barge kicking about doing nothing ?!?
connavar is offline  
Old 9th January 2002 | 20:36
  #2 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Post

There used to be such a beast! I don't know why the proposed replacement never happened, but the sooner the better. Congestion at the present heliport is very bad at times.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 9th January 2002 | 21:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: bucks
Post

Aha.. the eternal quest for a new London Heliport...

The Dome site would be nice with a bit of redevelopment - We got S76 into the site on a number of occasions (with the permission from the powers-at-be at the time) but no chance now!

The Barge idea seems not an entirely unfeaseable idea, but what about high and low tides? Fixed pontoon perhaps?

Any one else have a cunning plan?
elvistheopsman is offline  
Old 9th January 2002 | 22:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Ask the voices!
Question

There was a guy who owned a house boat on the Thames, considering purchasing an R44. He was discussion the feasability of a private helipad adjacent to his boat.

Don't know what came of that one. He seemed to be fairly serious at the time though.


"Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue!"
HeliEng is offline  
Old 9th January 2002 | 22:49
  #5 (permalink)  
"Trust Me"
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Egham, UK
Post

I think I vaguely remember that the barge idea was quashed due to the noise lobby..........

DOC
DOC.400 is offline  
Old 9th January 2002 | 23:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

How about a really radical idea and let helicopters into City airport? They have more space than Battersea and I'm sure wouldn't be too upset by the extra revenue.

On the barge idea if the Noise lobby got their way we'd be landing on things in the North Sea.. Ahh the memories...
magbreak is offline  
Old 10th January 2002 | 18:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: bucks
Post

Apparently a 'no helicopters' stipulation was in the planning permit for London City all those years ago - Again not to upset the residents with unnecessary noise... BAe 146's slip by almost unnoticeably dont they?!
elvistheopsman is offline  
Old 11th January 2002 | 00:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: London
Post

Going back to the 1950s there was a floating helipad between Lambeth and Westminster bridges, and in the about 20 years ago there was another one at Cannon Street, but it was closed down by the noise/safety lobby.
The BHAB has identified seven suitable sites along the river, and had high hopes of one at Gallions Point, on the south east corner of EGLC, but I believe that has now been built on.
No government (of any stripe) wants to know about this one, simple as that.
The BHAB has lobbied to have EGLC opened to helicopters but looks to be on a loser. The airport was originally given planning permission on the condition that no jets were allowed, and of course they have the 7-degree glideslope for noise abatement. Since that original decision, of course, jets have been allowed in - originally it was only the BAe 146, but in time it became fair game for just about anybody. But what chance of helicopters ever getting in there? Diddly squit, IMHO
t'aint natural is offline  
Old 11th January 2002 | 20:27
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 438
Likes: 2
From: Derby
Post

I seem to recall (a vague memory from a short newspaper report I saw some years ago) a 'moving barge' helipad being sugested a few years back - mid/late 80's(?) The various authorities along the Thames refused it permission to moor in their patch, so it wasn't a goer (if you don't have access to the banks, a helipad's not a lot of use). I assume the planners were thinking of the noise/'safety' lobby. I don't think it got to the point of any public enquiry.
Cars, buses, lorries clogging the streets and clagging the air? No worries, the more the merrier. Helicopters trundling up the Thames? No way! Perfect sense to me (not). But then I am biased.
Robbo Jock is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.