Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Low RRPM in cruise

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Low RRPM in cruise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2005, 22:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Low RRPM in cruise

Do you use less than 100% rotor rpm in cruise ?

Yes?
No?
In what type?
and WHY?

Thanks for your comments.

Aser
Aser is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 22:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,373
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
In the Huey, we would beep down to 97% as we were told it was more efficient.

In the S76B we use 107%, because Nick said so!
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 00:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AC
I don't remember ever telling you to beep a Huey down to 97 PERCENT!
Altering RRPM in flight MAY produce a better angle of attack of main rotor blade therefore more rotor efficiency, less power required but depends on number of factors DA, AUW among them - in most cases benefits can be relatively insignificant.
GAGS
E86
eagle 86 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 01:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Iceland
Age: 58
Posts: 814
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the B-407 was supposed to have a "silent mode" where you could flip a switch and the RRPM would decrease some percent! Donīt know if it is standard or what, probably some 407 driverīs will tell us?

I also heard that the AS332 Super Puma has some feature to change RRPM by switch flick, but that is to avoid some phase interference with LLZ on approaches?

Yes in the 212 and 222 you can decrease the RPM to 97-98% inflight for some performance gain, I have been told the gain is neglible though so I have never done that. I keep the RRPM at 99.5 to 100% more or less.

I believe if I remember right that in the Schweizer 300C there is some mention of 3000 ERPM for extended cruise so thatīs certainly less than 100% RRPM. One could probably figure out the performance gain from the tables, I think there are tables both for 3000 & 3200 ERPM!
Aesir is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 02:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up rrpm

SK76A

Co. proc....beep UP to 107NR for same cruise tq setting resulting in lower blade angle= less drag= lower fuel burn.

Only valid over long distances...ie. offshore flying.

Lower nr to 96% only for single engine flyaway and climbout. Never during dual engine op's!!

That's all I know about that!!

D.K

P.S. Interesting topic though......Nick where you at?????
donut king is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 02:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Missouri, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he'll post when he regains his composure from laughing so hard.
Gerhardt is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 03:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GH
and your point is?
GAGS E86
eagle 86 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 06:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,373
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
Eagle 86, of course you can't remember telling me to beep down. You're an old man now, and your memory is shot - Agent Orange was the first cause, living in Orange is the second, not enough oxygen up there for an old bloke like you. And besides, it was Bach who told me.

It technically wasn't 97%, it was beeping down from 324 RRPM to 310 or something like that.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 07:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
In my day (younger than you blokes!) it was 6600 to 6400 N2, don't really know if it worked but we would do it on long transits generally.
Arm out the window is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 07:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Over here
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's standard procedure to beep back to 97% in the 412. IME that results in better airspeed and lower fuel burn. It's a minor improvement, but I think it's there. The RPM reduction is mainly for vibration reduction, though.
Gomer Pylot is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 07:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,496
Received 89 Likes on 35 Posts
Dunno where all these percentages came from in the Huey - like Arm Out says, it was 6600RPM down to 6400, or 6000 under some-circumstances-or-other which I can't remember after 21 years. The transit from Seeb to Khasab could be done in a one'r (with about 10% reserves) at FL100 with the RPM beeped down. However, most of the Rhodie's had a thing about flying above 2000 feet (something to do with aircraft fires back home?) so usually had to refuel at Sohar.
Thud_and_Blunder is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 09:55
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Precisely the point I was trying to make to AC - 66 to 64 - nothing to do with % - I knew you weren't listening all those years ago!!
GAGS
E86
PS Where's big brother these days?
eagle 86 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 10:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,373
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
Geez, Eagle 86, your brain is totally gone!

Big Brother is on the Gold Coast, and the show finished about 3 weeks ago - the Logan twins won it.

My brain is only partly gone, I was about to edit my post to say 6600 N2 to 6400 N2, but I got beaten to it. Our current Huey IS in percentage RPM, even if it is a Garlick special.


But seriously, big brother IS on the Gold Coast, flying for JetStar.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 11:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We use 107% in our 76B because that's what the fadec sets and we can't change it!
magbreak is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 15:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tax-land.
Posts: 909
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Howdy Ya'll. BHT recommends a 97% rotor RPM setting for cruise, it reduces vibes and provides a more comfortable ride. Also, beeping RPM down to 97%, mast TQ is reduced, and by adding collective pitch to re-establish cruise setting (more or less 80%), there is additional A/S to gain but no particular savings in fuel economy.
For all those whom are familiar with the 205/212/412 family tree, the XMSN remain largely unchanged. The 6600 RPM refers to the output from either the Lycoming T-53 or the PT-6 Twin Pack's combining gearbox to the main rotor XMSN.
This shaft (also known as long shaft) rotates at 6600 RPM at 100% setting and 6402RPM at......................97%.
So, in the end it's all and the same.
tottigol is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 15:20
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
So...
i.e. bell 412
less rrpm(with the same TQ setting) =
more confortable ride.
more knots at the same TQ setting.
and just a few pounds of better fuel burn?

S76
more rrpm(with the same TQ setting) =
less AOA in blades = less drag = NOTICEABLE better fuel burn?

It would be interesting to hear more comments from other helicopter types (ec-120/130 etc.).


Regards
Aser
Aser is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 16:36
  #17 (permalink)  
Passion Flying Hobby Science Sponsor Work
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Belgium
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low RPM

R44

My simulator roughly predicts 0.75L/hr (0.5-1 depending on precise parameters) saved per percent drop in R44.
So yes, I sometimes use this, but then the L-RPM beeper is really a problem...

Retreating bladestall should be watched though (again depending on speed/load/density)

d3
delta3 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 17:51
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To add...

76.... reduced AOA=less drag= lower fuel burn...

This practise is noticeable at altitude, above standard conditions and over distance.Helps when flying minimum legal fuel. Every pound/ litre/ gallon counts!!!

Also KTAS increases by a few knots. Play with your GPS fuel planning function, given these parameters, and see if this works.

DK
donut king is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 18:28
  #19 (permalink)  
Passion Flying Hobby Science Sponsor Work
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Belgium
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low RPM

DK

I am not shure I do understand, but the theory (and my math) show that AOA increases up to the optimal point. Increase is necessary because overall the rotor is not very charged at reasonable cruise speed, and thus below optimal loading. One exception is the retreating tip. Reducing RPM will require you to pull collective to maintain speed, this should convince you that AOA increases.

Added : drag is lower because average speed of blades is reduced by lower RPM. A low loaded profile has near constant drag coefficient, so only dependent on speed and not really on AOA.

d3
delta3 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2005, 18:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: T.B.A.
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Single's

As said the Bell 407 does have a "silent mode" just for cruising but it is an additional extra fitted separately, with it's own supplement in the Flight Manual.

The EC 120 does not have the facility to beep down it's RRPM.

Neither does the AS350B3 and therefore I don't think the EC130 (AS350B4) has it either.
Recuperator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.