LTS-101 powered AS-350D ASTAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LTS-101 powered AS-350D ASTAR
After the terrible reputation these aircraft (engines)obtained in the 1980s does anyone know how the engine is holding up now on the remaining AS-350Ds out there ?....At one time they were called "EXPLODING STARS"
There are a few operated in Southern California that ive seen lately and its made me wonder.
From what i heard the problems are a thing of the past and considering the LTS-101s are about 1/3 the cost to overhaul and burn less fuel than the turbomecca they are now worth considering. Ive even been told some people are reconverting Turbomecca REengined AS-350Ds back to the LTS-101.
ANY COMMENTS ?
[ 04 September 2001: Message edited by: Larry ]
There are a few operated in Southern California that ive seen lately and its made me wonder.
From what i heard the problems are a thing of the past and considering the LTS-101s are about 1/3 the cost to overhaul and burn less fuel than the turbomecca they are now worth considering. Ive even been told some people are reconverting Turbomecca REengined AS-350Ds back to the LTS-101.
ANY COMMENTS ?
[ 04 September 2001: Message edited by: Larry ]
The older LTS-101 engines were indeed troublesome and were terribly unreliable, but the later versions (A-3) shouldn't be saddled with the same reputation.
Nowadays, things have changed and the engine has become all the things you say in your post. I haven't flown one in 6 years, but I have friends who operate D's and B's together and find the D to be a much better ship. Easy on gas, easy to start, more reliable and MUCH lower DOCs. The company you speak of is now marketing a 'Super D' using BA components with the LTS powerplant, and by all accounts it's a great ship.
Nowadays, things have changed and the engine has become all the things you say in your post. I haven't flown one in 6 years, but I have friends who operate D's and B's together and find the D to be a much better ship. Easy on gas, easy to start, more reliable and MUCH lower DOCs. The company you speak of is now marketing a 'Super D' using BA components with the LTS powerplant, and by all accounts it's a great ship.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: small town NZ
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I work for a company that has a lot of D's and a Super D. Seem to be pretty good with the updated 101, having said that I had an early 101 distroy itself on the side of a hill, not a good feeling.
The super D pisses all over the BA and would fly it any day. All our landings are around 8000 feet and we have no troulbe with 7 pob and good fuel.
That's my 2 cents worth - hope it helps.
The super D pisses all over the BA and would fly it any day. All our landings are around 8000 feet and we have no troulbe with 7 pob and good fuel.
That's my 2 cents worth - hope it helps.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LTS101 engine of today is a very different engine to the engine of the early eighties...lots of development taken place with turbine wheels, burner cans and such like ...it is now a very good engine and as indicated in a previous post...having said all that I only operate the engine in the BK117 not the AS350!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: states
Age: 68
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is an example of the improved Honeywell engine....
http://av-info.faa.gov/ad/PublishedADs/011715.html
The fuel pump needs to be pulled every 600 hours, and sent to CECO for inspection...not field maintainable.....
http://av-info.faa.gov/ad/PublishedADs/011715.html
The fuel pump needs to be pulled every 600 hours, and sent to CECO for inspection...not field maintainable.....
