Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Charts...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Sep 2005, 18:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Charts...

1-Does your twin(specify type) have a drop down height chart?
2-Does your twin(specify type) have a single engine hovering ceiling chart?

Yes,No,Why?,comments


Thanks.
Aser
Aser is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2005, 00:05
  #2 (permalink)  
IHL
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi ASER: I assume (maybe wrongly) that you mean by "drop down" as being able to maintain a MEA over high terrain after an engine becomes inoperative.

The chart to use-depending on regulatory authority-would be the 30 min power [OEI] forward climb performance chart. If your performance matches ZERO ROC or better your good to go.

I'm not aware of any current twin helicopter that has single engine hover performance. Perhaps the AB139 or S92 does, but I don't know.
IHL is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2005, 06:43
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
IHL you're assuming it right.
I've used the ROC chart in the same way you explain but I was wondering is there are specific tables for the "drop down" or single engine hover in any helo.
Is it just because you can extract the data from other charts?
Nick can you comment?


IHL: "depending on regulatory authority" <- Did they say what charts to use?

Thanks.
Aser is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2005, 14:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 900
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
I think you need to be clearer whether you are discussing 'drift down' or 'drop down' they are totally different.

Drift down is the ability to fly at an altitude with the knowledge that, if you lose an engine, you can drift down to maintain a safe altitude - whilst clearing obstacles during the descent by the prescribed distance. This can be calculated but the glide angle has to be used (i.e. wind has to be known); unless it is done offshore when it is a simple calculation.

Drop down is associated with Category A procedures - it represents the one-engine-inoperative descent from TDP to a point (usually called min-dip) from which obstacle clearance can be assured and continued take-off is possible. Drop down graphs are provided by manufacturer which have these type of procedures; where elevated helideck/heliport procedures are provided the deck-edge miss is guaranteed by the procedure and drop down below the take-off site is permitted.

Most twin engine helicopters can hover on one engine - only the best can do it at close to MAUM. For civilian helicopters, the AB139 gets the prize and most of the clever small twins (EC135, MD902, A109 - power and grand, Bell 429 etc) are getting closer (at sea level). Most States require OEI HOGE performance to be calculated and used when CAT hoisting is being performed.

Last edited by JimL; 2nd Sep 2005 at 14:49.
JimL is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2005, 15:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks JimL, I didn't know the difference, I was asking if there are "drift down" charts.

Regards.
Aser
Aser is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2005, 00:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Age: 73
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There probably won't be any charts labeled 'drift down'. They will be more probably the required-by-regulation 'rate of climb' charts. They just happen to show negative rates of climb...
Shawn Coyle is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 18:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
If my memory serves me correctly (it rarely does) JAR requires you to have 50'ROC at this stabilised ht on one engine.
EESDL is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 21:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,267
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Missed this one!

Naturally, Jim and Shawn are correct, along with EESDL.

You can produce your own charts if the FLM ones are not user friendly. The thing is to determine what fixed parameter you want (RoC, Weight etc). It takes a lot of time extracting the plotting points, but you can then produce a more user friendly result. e.g. for the EC-155 I produced a single graph to determine PC1/2 en-route weights from 4 separate graphs in the FLM; much easier to use!

It is also correct that many older types can hover OEI; just not necessarily at the weight you'd like them to!
212man is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.