Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Collision avoidance

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Collision avoidance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th October 2000 | 16:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thomas coupling
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy Collision avoidance

I'd like to make a plug here for flight safety, both FW and RW.
Modern aircraft (including new generation emergency services helicopters, MD 902/EC135/109 etc) are fitted with TCAS (traffic alert and collision avoidance) equipment. They work on the principal of identifying the position of another a/c by its transponder transmission. it will then track it and determine whether it is a collision threat. It is no substitute for the mark one eyeball but it is definitely the next best thing.
Currently (last 18 months) the British Helicopter Advisory Board (BHAB) through its emergency services sub committee are processing returns from all the HEMS and police units in England and Wales. These returns are not proximity reports (where near misses are correlated by the CAA), but "in vicinity" reports, giving a more vivid picture of traffic that could give cause for concern if not closely monitored.
This year from 10 units alone, there have been 84 'close encounters' where the pilot felt uneasy enough to submit a report. Of these over 70% have been identified through TCAS!!! This means that in pre TCAS days, this was still going on and the pilot was blissfully unaware of the threat! Remember, any of these could quickly go sour and turn into a mid air collision.
The aim of the project is to provide a data bank of information which can be used to promote flight safety at the highest level.
As you are all aware, there are several instances where light FW / helo's have been in collision with military a/c. BHAB are instrumental in persuading the MOD that "attrition rates" do not exist in the civvy world! By flying military hardware low and fast with transponder ON can go a long way to reducing the risks. It is hoped that as a consequence of this research, all/most military a/c will be fitted with a TCAS of some description so that they also may be able to identify traffic, not fitted with the luxury of its own TCAS. In the meantime, to all those out there who have a transponder fitted (and they are not expensive to install), PLEASE, PLEASE fly round with them ON at all times [and with mode 'C' if fitted]. It may save your life one day.

Having said that, I recently overheard a puddle jumper say that he had no intention of switching his transponder on and "... lighting up like a beacon when he was doing a bit of low flying..."!
It makes you wonder...............

------------------
TC
 
Old 20th October 2000 | 16:51
  #2 (permalink)  
PurplePitot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

TC. Did you ever do a 206 job for Butlins??
 
Old 20th October 2000 | 19:43
  #3 (permalink)  
Thomas coupling
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

No but I work with the man who did!!

------------------
TC
 
Old 21st October 2000 | 17:36
  #4 (permalink)  
Marco
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

TC
Despite what the military say, both RW & FW, a large majority fly around with their transponders in the off position. Or they have switch problems leaving it in the 'I' rather than 3A. Problem is there heirachy is prepared to accept an attrition rate whereas we're not. Unfortunately it will take a couple more dreadful accidents before their hand is forced.

Eyes peeled!
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.