UK POF(H) exam
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UK POF(H) exam
What is the degree of difficulty in the UK POF(H) exam under the "interim arrangement"? If you compare with the FAA system, are the questions in the UK exam harder than the corresponding FAA ATP questions? Can you survive the test only by using Principles of Helicopter Flight by W.J. Wagtendonk?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Knowing Wagtendonk inside out, as well as a days brush up through Mike Burton at Bristol GS did the trick for me. I got 99% and just about all of the 7 people who went through in my brush up were well in the 90's.
Did the exams in May, ours was one of the first of a new set of papers wiith a lot of different questions on it, but it didn't seem to pose anyone through Bristol any significant problems.
Only difficulty was that some of the phraseology in the exam was different to that written in the book, but that's the case for a lot of the exams.
Can't comment on FAA thing
Did the exams in May, ours was one of the first of a new set of papers wiith a lot of different questions on it, but it didn't seem to pose anyone through Bristol any significant problems.
Only difficulty was that some of the phraseology in the exam was different to that written in the book, but that's the case for a lot of the exams.
Can't comment on FAA thing
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my tank engine
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Idid my theory exams back in 1998, The POF exam may have changed a bit since then. I found the wording on some of the questions quite difficult I passed all the other exams but failed POF 
I then got a POF questions and answers book from Bristows the book was spot on and I got a score of about 90% this was a realy old book from when Bristow done CPL training.
The theory may have changed a bit since then.
Ive never been through the FAA system but I think youl find the two systems are very different.
Good luck.
I then got a POF questions and answers book from Bristows the book was spot on and I got a score of about 90% this was a realy old book from when Bristow done CPL training.
The theory may have changed a bit since then.
Ive never been through the FAA system but I think youl find the two systems are very different.
Good luck.
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TTTE,
I failed P of F too. I then wrote to the CAA querying the answer to one question where I'd felt that all four answers were wrong (height of grounds cushion, for anyone who wants to know). I'd only failed by 2 marks, so one question could have made all the difference. They checked and gave me the two marks and a PASS, on the grounds that most standard texts (Wagtendonk etc) agreed with me, but the book they were using was...something little known, and I can't remember the name, and don't have time to find the reply now.
Sounds like things have changed - maybe for the better.
I failed P of F too. I then wrote to the CAA querying the answer to one question where I'd felt that all four answers were wrong (height of grounds cushion, for anyone who wants to know). I'd only failed by 2 marks, so one question could have made all the difference. They checked and gave me the two marks and a PASS, on the grounds that most standard texts (Wagtendonk etc) agreed with me, but the book they were using was...something little known, and I can't remember the name, and don't have time to find the reply now.
Sounds like things have changed - maybe for the better.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Midlands
Age: 71
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wagtendonk
I only had to do the Helicopter Technical and FlightPlanning and Performance Paper. (I got swept up on Human Performance too....) as I already hold a PPL(A).
Wagtendonk does not cover the subjects completely - I found myself faced with a number of questions about ( from memory) - pressure instruments, what maintenance can you do yourself, fuel uploads ( incl a specific gravity conversion), what defines 'Service Ceiling' plus a few others that caused me to either dig into the grey archive or guess.
Despite that, I got nearly 90% on FP&P and 96% on Technical. (The Human Performance is a gift of a paper. I got 92% without reading the book).
Wag. Is an excellent book and a must for the Commercial I am told.
Test passed yesterday - hurrah!
HP
Wagtendonk does not cover the subjects completely - I found myself faced with a number of questions about ( from memory) - pressure instruments, what maintenance can you do yourself, fuel uploads ( incl a specific gravity conversion), what defines 'Service Ceiling' plus a few others that caused me to either dig into the grey archive or guess.
Despite that, I got nearly 90% on FP&P and 96% on Technical. (The Human Performance is a gift of a paper. I got 92% without reading the book).
Wag. Is an excellent book and a must for the Commercial I am told.
Test passed yesterday - hurrah!
HP
Guest
Posts: n/a
well put it this way...
When I took the POF(H) exam last year, our sitting was the first group to undertake the exam from the new updated question bank. The CAA had slipped it in unexpetedly. I had never seen any of the questions before but had enough applied knowledge to acheive 81%. I knew the Wagtendonk book inside out and hopefully have retained much of it. So there's your answer - Mr Wagtenbonk or what ever his bloody name is, holds the key !!
Good luck all !!
TFS
Good luck all !!
TFS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you only get 81% when you know "the Wagtendonk book inside out" I should use feedback questions to be on the safe side. If anyone can lend or sell some it would be much appreciated if you could PM me. Thanks.
Last edited by Martin1234; 1st Sep 2005 at 21:51.
