Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Rucker T-67 crash

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Rucker T-67 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jun 2005, 22:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 516
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
Rucker T-67 crash

Article about the crash, looks like the IP was killed.

http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/p.../APN/506230948
havoc is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2005, 02:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
What's a T-67? Google only comes up with a fixed wing.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2005, 04:12
  #3 (permalink)  
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Military version of the Bell 206. Used for training. Similar to the OH-58. All have the same airframe, differences are in the parts..
B Sousa is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2005, 13:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MightGem -

I think Havoc means TH-67. (A far better safety record than the T-67 Firefly, even in light of Thursday's unfortunate incident...)



I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2005, 13:49
  #5 (permalink)  
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
symantics...............your right TH-67
B Sousa is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2005, 16:33
  #6 (permalink)  

Better red than ...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"You're right" surely? (or better "You're correct")
helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2005, 17:24
  #7 (permalink)  

There are no limits
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shrewsbury, England.
Age: 67
Posts: 505
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the beef about the T67 Firefly safety record? I flew it and it was great.
What Limits is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2005, 17:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Firefly's a good-looking aircraft, but the USAF grounded its fleet of 114 T-3 variants in '97 and withdrew them from service for good in '99 after a spate of incidents following the type's introduction in '94.

The T-3's problems were mainly due to the fact that the USAF had decided to re-engine the aircraft with the more powerful Lycoming AEIO-540 (in place of the usual O-235 or O-320), and -- more importantly -- to install an automatic mixture control servo 'off-the-shelf,' without additional testing.

As a result, a number of fuel metering events were experienced at altitude (not something to build confidence in newbie pilots!!). Other rumors at the time suggested the grounding was a political (i.e. NIH) issue.

There are still 50 or so aircraft rotting away at Hondo Airport in Texas. Not a pretty site.

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2005, 14:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Firefly problem could have been easily resolved but the real reason the USAF got it cancelled is really that is wan't made in USA.

Canada used the T67 for the past ten years without any issues. We are switching to the Grob 120 now as part of a new contract, hope that little beast works out as well.
Corax is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.