Warm and Fuzzy places to work.....
Thread Starter
Warm and Fuzzy places to work.....
A large EMS provider here in the USA posts ads for pilots....they are rumoured to be anywhere from 30-50 pilots short of manning needs. Here is their solution on how to attract new meat for the grinder.
Position is located in XXXXXXXXXX. If you meet the following requirements, please go to www.XXXXXXXXXXX.com and apply online:
Excellent interpersonal skills o Ability to work respectfully and collaboratively with others o Must live within the geographic location of the base (i.e., a reasonable driving time of not more than approximately one hour.) o Desire to be part of a team EOE/M/F/D/V
Don't call...don't e-mail your Resume....just plug your bio data into the computer computer and wait for the robot to act.
If they don't want to talk to you about what they have to offer...how are they going to be to work for? If they don't care about the "personal touch" when they are trying to convince you to hire on....how you think they will be when you need something from them down the line.
Am I the only one that thinks an attitude like this by the HR departments in helicopter operators is not the way it ought to be? Or am I being unreasonable in my expectations?
Position is located in XXXXXXXXXX. If you meet the following requirements, please go to www.XXXXXXXXXXX.com and apply online:
Excellent interpersonal skills o Ability to work respectfully and collaboratively with others o Must live within the geographic location of the base (i.e., a reasonable driving time of not more than approximately one hour.) o Desire to be part of a team EOE/M/F/D/V
Don't call...don't e-mail your Resume....just plug your bio data into the computer computer and wait for the robot to act.
If they don't want to talk to you about what they have to offer...how are they going to be to work for? If they don't care about the "personal touch" when they are trying to convince you to hire on....how you think they will be when you need something from them down the line.
Am I the only one that thinks an attitude like this by the HR departments in helicopter operators is not the way it ought to be? Or am I being unreasonable in my expectations?
Hovering AND talking
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No SASless, you're not the only one.
I have recruited employees many times in my job (not aviation) and I would always want to see a CV. Even if my ad stipulated certain requirements and there are always applicants who don't fulfill those requirements but they apply anyway, I would respond with an individual letter.
All I can think is some weeding out process but on what criteria, who knows?
I would still like to think that this is uncommon and will not become the norm.
Cheers
Whirlygig
I have recruited employees many times in my job (not aviation) and I would always want to see a CV. Even if my ad stipulated certain requirements and there are always applicants who don't fulfill those requirements but they apply anyway, I would respond with an individual letter.
All I can think is some weeding out process but on what criteria, who knows?
I would still like to think that this is uncommon and will not become the norm.
Cheers
Whirlygig
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could always send potential applicants one of these:-
http://www.alt-gifts.com/shop/index2...roduct_id/3150
http://www.alt-gifts.com/shop/index2...roduct_id/3150
Thread Starter
The FAA looks out for their employees too!
The Top Headlines From AVweb's Expanded, Illustrated News Coverage At AVweb's NewsWire.
FSS CONTRACT: THE (LEGAL) BATTLE BEGINS…
They've tried just about everything else and now the National Association of Air Traffic Specialists (NAATS) is taking a new tack to try and prevent the contracting out of flight service stations. NAATS claims the process constitutes age discrimination and filed suit today. The union is seeking a preliminary injunction to halt the contracting process (the winning bidder, Lockheed Martin, is already well into its pre-transition program) followed by a permanent injunction. NAATS director Mike Sheldon said the process could potentially leave almost 1,000 displaced workers without pensions, even though they are close to retirement age. "They will be without an annuity. They will be left with virtually nothing," he said. More...
...SAVINGS EFFICIENCY AND LOST PENSIONS...
Sheldon said that if the contract proceeds on schedule, the FAA will save tens of millions of dollars by avoiding paying pensions to the displaced workers. He said that of 963 workers who will be left without a pension, roughly two-thirds are within five years of qualifying. According to the press release, the NAATS suit alleges the contracting process "is timed to deny substantial federal retirement benefits" to FSS workers who are more than 40 years old. Sheldon said the timing of the contract with the major retirement bubble of FSS workers only a few years away "is quite a coincidence." More...
...AS LOCKHEED'S FSS TRANSITION CONTINUES
Meanwhile, the effort from within the FAA to derail the Lockheed bid remains in the hands of the FAA's Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition (ODRA). The FAA's Air Traffic Organization (ATO), which now runs the FSS system, submitted a bid in conjunction with Harris Corp. In what may be an unprecedented move, the ATO filed a protest over the award of the contract to Lockheed Martin, citing irregularities and incomplete work in the assessment process. The ATO's attorney, Cyrus Phillips, told AVweb he expected a decision on the challenge before now and he's unsure when it will be issued. In the meantime, Lockheed continues to carry out its transition program and Phillips is concerned staffing problems are on the horizon. More...
FSS CONTRACT: THE (LEGAL) BATTLE BEGINS…
They've tried just about everything else and now the National Association of Air Traffic Specialists (NAATS) is taking a new tack to try and prevent the contracting out of flight service stations. NAATS claims the process constitutes age discrimination and filed suit today. The union is seeking a preliminary injunction to halt the contracting process (the winning bidder, Lockheed Martin, is already well into its pre-transition program) followed by a permanent injunction. NAATS director Mike Sheldon said the process could potentially leave almost 1,000 displaced workers without pensions, even though they are close to retirement age. "They will be without an annuity. They will be left with virtually nothing," he said. More...
...SAVINGS EFFICIENCY AND LOST PENSIONS...
Sheldon said that if the contract proceeds on schedule, the FAA will save tens of millions of dollars by avoiding paying pensions to the displaced workers. He said that of 963 workers who will be left without a pension, roughly two-thirds are within five years of qualifying. According to the press release, the NAATS suit alleges the contracting process "is timed to deny substantial federal retirement benefits" to FSS workers who are more than 40 years old. Sheldon said the timing of the contract with the major retirement bubble of FSS workers only a few years away "is quite a coincidence." More...
...AS LOCKHEED'S FSS TRANSITION CONTINUES
Meanwhile, the effort from within the FAA to derail the Lockheed bid remains in the hands of the FAA's Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition (ODRA). The FAA's Air Traffic Organization (ATO), which now runs the FSS system, submitted a bid in conjunction with Harris Corp. In what may be an unprecedented move, the ATO filed a protest over the award of the contract to Lockheed Martin, citing irregularities and incomplete work in the assessment process. The ATO's attorney, Cyrus Phillips, told AVweb he expected a decision on the challenge before now and he's unsure when it will be issued. In the meantime, Lockheed continues to carry out its transition program and Phillips is concerned staffing problems are on the horizon. More...
