Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Gazelle: Flying, operating, buying

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Gazelle: Flying, operating, buying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jul 2009, 18:51
  #441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southend
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you need to lift, might I suggest the 342 variant.
Bigger engine uprated transmission.
Several for sale in the UK I believe.
Great Aircraft to fly.
HeliAl is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2009, 22:34
  #442 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
26 lifting a TU-134

SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2009, 23:46
  #443 (permalink)  

There are no limits
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shrewsbury, England.
Age: 67
Posts: 505
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't recall the Gazelle being categorised as a heavy lifter but you should look at the Lama which can lift a lot and take it to altitude like no other.

The designation is SA315.
What Limits is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 11:06
  #444 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Essex
Age: 54
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, I enquired about conversion and hiring one from Excel Charter.

The response was:

"We can carry out training on the Gazelle for type rating but would require 5 hours minimum for 1st Turbine.
The cost is £550 per hour wet and your instructor would be £350 per day and I would allow a minimum of 3 days.
All subject to VAT at the prevailing rate.

As far as hiring an aircraft is concerned our insurance requires a minimum of 500 hours total time, 250 hours turbine and 100 hours make and model"

I am a long way off those hours for rotary
s1lverback is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 23:37
  #445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 254
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
I have some technical questions about the operation of the Gazelle helicopter. I'm wondering if someone can answer them. They are for a technical discussion on the Blue Thunder film.

a) From what I see in YouTube videos, the normal startup of a Gazelle would be to start the turbine, then run up the rotors to full RPM. Is that correct?

b) Can you start a Gazelle with the rotors engaged, like with a Jetranger? This is seen briefly in the film, but I suspect it was pretend for the film.

c) Can you run the turbine with the rotors engaged at an idle RPM setting, or must you keep it at the flight RPM setting?

d) If you can idle the turbine and rotors, does it suffer from the same vibration problems as the C series Dauphin if being idled with the rotors engaged?

e) Did these specific procedures change since 1983 (when the film was made)?

Thanks!

Andrew.
Tickle is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2009, 03:10
  #446 (permalink)  

There are no limits
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shrewsbury, England.
Age: 67
Posts: 505
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The gazelle has a centrifugal clutch in the drivetrain that engages and disengages at around 30000 ish RPM

The normal start sequence is to start the engine which 'ground idles' at 25000ish Nc IIRC.

Then advance the throttle smoothly until the clutch bites then advance keeping the torque between 10 and 20%

Once the throttle is fully forward, the aircraft 'flight idles' at around 47000 ish RPM Nc IIRC

If you bring the throttle back to ground idle, the clutch will disengage and the rotors will come to a stop either by using the rotor brake or by friction. The engine will continue to run at 25000 ish

If you have an out of balance clutch or freewheel it tells you right soon.

AFAIK the gazelle has always been run like this.

I am sure some smart aleck will correct the numbers, but its been a few years and several types since I flew that sucker!
What Limits is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2009, 07:19
  #447 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Ignore anything that you saw in Blue Thunder. Especially the turned up collar on Roy Schnieder's flying suit!
MightyGem is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2009, 03:07
  #448 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 254
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
Thanks, What Limits. That helps explain everything!

What's the significance of the upturned collar? I have a feeling it has to do with respect or status, or something?
Tickle is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2009, 06:09
  #449 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
with respect or status, or something?
Something, definitely, but neither of those two.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 19:04
  #450 (permalink)  
DXB
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SA 341G

Gents

Have been flying for many years on fixed wing....looking at getting a Gazelle for my personal use.Would appreciate pro's and con's on this machine......thanks in advance for any info.
DXB is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 19:40
  #451 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near the bottom
Posts: 1,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
DXB - check your PMs!

TTB
toptobottom is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 19:59
  #452 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Up here, but not for long
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great machine but NOT for inexperienced helicopter pilots
Wizzard is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 20:15
  #453 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
DXB, the Gazelle is a superb A/C. It like every other has foibles but in over 3000 hrs the only failures I ever had were a Generator and a couple of Radio snags.

I'd suggest a good handling package with an experienced Gazelle qualified guy before leaping off into the wide blue younder.
timex is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:40
  #454 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great machine but NOT for inexperienced helicopter pilots
Why not? Didn't the military use them as a basic trainer before the AS350?

BC
Bladecrack is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:49
  #455 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmm ...


Why not? Didn't the military use them as a basic trainer before the AS350?


Perhaps .... BUT ... the level of supervision of a MIL nooby is generally a lot greater than that of a CIVVY nooby!!!

And a Gazelle will BITE you very quickly if you abuse the 'slippery lil sucker'.

spinwing is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 14:42
  #456 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

i'd be happier sending a newly qualified pilot off in a gazelle than a R22, the only problem with inexperienced pilot in a gazelle is the speed at which people tend to fly them is faster than their brain. So learn sensibly and initially fly slowly 70-90 kts untill your brain/reactions catch up
thwock is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 18:28
  #457 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
Bladecrack,bear in mind that the mil had chopped a lot of potential pilots before the course got anywhere near the 341. Then remember that the potential pilots were paid to be there and were living, breathing helicopters for 8 to 10 hours a day, 5 days a week for the best part of 8 months. Plus some top notch instructors. I was told the gazelle was an easy heli to fly but a very difficult one to fly well, which i managed to prove on loads of occasions thwock is dead right, the whistling sperm will get you into trouble very quickly unless the brain is infront of it
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 18:53
  #458 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 426 Likes on 225 Posts
Plus some top notch instructors.
Who are we to argue?

The Gazelle is a great little machine. Found my ideal job flying as an unofficial trial comms and recce pilot for the deployed Chinooks in Germany, back in the 1980s.

No crewman, flew at 50 to 100' agl everywhere, parked anywhere, scrounged a meal at whatever flight I went to, own boss - bliss!

They were so chuffed they later went and got their own.

Well, it knocked airfield damage repair recce (what I was really supposed to be doing) into a cocked hat!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 23:31
  #459 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Up here, but not for long
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bladecrack,bear in mind that the mil had chopped a lot of potential pilots before the course got anywhere near the 341. Then remember that the potential pilots were paid to be there and were living, breathing helicopters for 8 to 10 hours a day, 5 days a week for the best part of 8 months. Plus some top notch instructors. I was told the gazelle was an easy heli to fly but a very difficult one to fly well, which i managed to prove on loads of occasions thwock is dead right, the whistling sperm will get you into trouble very quickly unless the brain is infront of it
Now that's what I should have said in my first post

Take care the Gazelle will bite.
Wizzard is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 09:53
  #460 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Then remember that the potential pilots were paid to be there and were living, breathing helicopters for 8 to 10 hours a day, 5 days a week for the best part of 8 months. Plus some top notch instructors.
Plus, we had 150 hours on it before being let loose on our own, and even then I had a crewman with me to keep me in check.
MightyGem is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.