AS350 Astar / AS355 Twinstar [Archive Copy]
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: oceanside
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hilico: for that a/c hose your okay, in stock, ready to ship, reasonable price, call platinum aviation.
now if i can just figure out how to finance an stc installation of PW207E engine we would really be cooking with gas.
dr
now if i can just figure out how to finance an stc installation of PW207E engine we would really be cooking with gas.
dr
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CD I thought first plan was a RR250 in EC120 , surely with all the disposable income on this site we could raise enuff capital !!! As350b207E is a bit long , any shorter names ? Is Jack K still around talking of platinium ?.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: oceanside
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
widgeon: so many more eligable airframes with regards to the astar. the 120 is ok as long as its kept light. as for jack K not sure if he is still involved.
will be at ecl monday
will be at ecl monday
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aus, Europe & everywhere in between
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gents
Are there any AS355 operators still having problems with this inspection?
Anyone know of the pilot being authorised to conduct said inspection or does it still require an engineer?
Thanks
Are there any AS355 operators still having problems with this inspection?
Anyone know of the pilot being authorised to conduct said inspection or does it still require an engineer?
Thanks
Right pain in the preverb.
We're lucky that aircraft is based where gingerbeers work but the flexibility of the beast is hampered for 'overnights'
Pilots are not auth'd to carry out the additional check - unless they're also a certified engineer
We're lucky that aircraft is based where gingerbeers work but the flexibility of the beast is hampered for 'overnights'
Pilots are not auth'd to carry out the additional check - unless they're also a certified engineer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the world
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got told by a little dickie bird that the whole reason why this check can not be carried out by a pilot is because the A.D that was sent out did not say to be carried out by engineer's & crew on it like all the rest and it was supposed to be on there.
which mean's this whole knightmare is all down to a typing error.
which mean's this whole knightmare is all down to a typing error.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the world
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Change
They are now letting pilot's carry out the A.D check if you get certified from a maintenence organisation.
I know McAlpine's are certifieing people to carry out this check
Hopefully no more messing around and that we can all get back to haveing a social life again .
I know McAlpine's are certifieing people to carry out this check
Hopefully no more messing around and that we can all get back to haveing a social life again .
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the world
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as I understand Eurocopter have Given all operatores a choice.
You can either check the damper daily before first flight or you can have the damper removed all together.
It's only taken them over a month to come up with this solution.
They must of had half a dozen monkeys working around the clock on this one
Any opinions on this
You can either check the damper daily before first flight or you can have the damper removed all together.
It's only taken them over a month to come up with this solution.
They must of had half a dozen monkeys working around the clock on this one
Any opinions on this
Last edited by goose boy; 15th Jul 2005 at 08:55.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brazil, (for now) USA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AS350B3 floats
I am looking to buy a set of floats for the 350 B3 model. If you have any ideia of who may have one available for sale, please let me know. this is hard to find and to expensive if you buy new at Eurocopter. Any ideia!!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 1 deg south, avoiding Malaria P Falciparium
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air Curiser and Apical. The advandage with the aircuriser is they pop on and off and the gas is in the float itself vs the aricraft. The Apical's are retty much permantly mounted on the skids, configured with several differnt bags.
good luck,
just remember never trust the floats, the electrial firing and alwys double check the rigging on the MANUAL release. Nothing more nerve racking than pulling the T handle and not hearing the floats go when your falling from the sky
rotorboy
good luck,
just remember never trust the floats, the electrial firing and alwys double check the rigging on the MANUAL release. Nothing more nerve racking than pulling the T handle and not hearing the floats go when your falling from the sky
rotorboy
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyway these could be automated, in a similar manner to airbags, to save pilot workload?
The simplest system would be a float in a small chamber, that triggered a fast inflation. OK it wouldn't stop partial submerge, but it would stop it becoming a more serious situation like inversion. Once the pax and pilot had walked away, the heli would also be recoverable.
Maybe even link it into the hard landing airbag system suggested in an earlier thread, although airbag/float shape might not be compatible.
Mart
The simplest system would be a float in a small chamber, that triggered a fast inflation. OK it wouldn't stop partial submerge, but it would stop it becoming a more serious situation like inversion. Once the pax and pilot had walked away, the heli would also be recoverable.
Maybe even link it into the hard landing airbag system suggested in an earlier thread, although airbag/float shape might not be compatible.
Mart
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 1 deg south, avoiding Malaria P Falciparium
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That really isnt practical. Most floats I have flown on an astar are fired by a trigger on the cyclic, that shoots a charge into the mechansim that inflats the floast (rather rapidly). There is usualy and secondary failsafe system ( I have seen fail) which is a mechanical linkage to the float firing device.
I as a pilot would rather have control of when the floats fire. Condiser the Autorotational charectaristics change dramatically with two huge airbags on the side. mo drag!
Floats may get you on the water but most of the time the a/c is lost due to capsizing.
rb
I as a pilot would rather have control of when the floats fire. Condiser the Autorotational charectaristics change dramatically with two huge airbags on the side. mo drag!
Floats may get you on the water but most of the time the a/c is lost due to capsizing.
rb
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Off the Planet
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There have been a number of accidents where aircraft have impacted the water in an uncontrolled manner, the flotation equipment has survived the impact but has not been manually activated by the crew. Research carried out by Westland Helicopters in the UK and independently in the USA on behalf of the FAA has identified drowning to be the major cause of loss of life. Aircraft occupants having survived the initial impact then failed to safely escape from the hull.
In March 1992, an AS332L crashed into Sea State 7 conditions during an offshore night flight. Only 6 of the 17 occupants survived. Although the impact was severe, post crash investigation indicated that the flotation system may have survived and been at least partially available, had it been activated. The crew did not have time to manually activate it and there was no automatic means. The accident investigators considered that inflated flotation bags would have prevented the hull from rapidly sinking and assisted passenger evacuation from the inverted cabin by allowing it to float higher in the water.
In September 1996, an AS350B1 was carrying out low level overwater filming with 2 persons on board. For reasons unknown, but suspected to be inadvertent closure of the fuel control lever, rotor rpm dropped and the aircraft descended into the sea. Although the pilot attempted to, he did not have enough time to manually activate the emergency flotation equipment. The helicopter impacted the sea, inverted with the subsequent loss of the passenger.
Provision of a means to automatically inflate both ditching and emergency floatation equipment could have prevented loss of life in the above accidents.
Most helicopters working offshore in the North Sea now have automatic inflation of floats.
In March 1992, an AS332L crashed into Sea State 7 conditions during an offshore night flight. Only 6 of the 17 occupants survived. Although the impact was severe, post crash investigation indicated that the flotation system may have survived and been at least partially available, had it been activated. The crew did not have time to manually activate it and there was no automatic means. The accident investigators considered that inflated flotation bags would have prevented the hull from rapidly sinking and assisted passenger evacuation from the inverted cabin by allowing it to float higher in the water.
In September 1996, an AS350B1 was carrying out low level overwater filming with 2 persons on board. For reasons unknown, but suspected to be inadvertent closure of the fuel control lever, rotor rpm dropped and the aircraft descended into the sea. Although the pilot attempted to, he did not have enough time to manually activate the emergency flotation equipment. The helicopter impacted the sea, inverted with the subsequent loss of the passenger.
Provision of a means to automatically inflate both ditching and emergency floatation equipment could have prevented loss of life in the above accidents.
Most helicopters working offshore in the North Sea now have automatic inflation of floats.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ADvantage of apical floats is you can take off again ( get a bit of spinning happening until the TR gets thrust ). The floats are fairly easily removeable it is just those pesky skid extensions that take some time. Phoenix in NWT are using them on their EC120 to land on lakes to collect water samples. I am not sure if any flotation system can recover a helicopter once it has ditched. ASide from the Sea king there are not many that will float for any appreciable time after impacting the water. Flying at high speed close to the water I do not think even automatically activated floats would be of any use
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: oceanside
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
widgeon: your correct, with the apical emergency floats you can land and take off as they have enough bouyancy to keep the tailrotor out of the water. ditching floats are approved for water landing only. operators must be careful to make sure they have emergency floats vs ditching floats, if they decide to alight from the water.
with regards to the extensions, have seen a number of operators keep the extension installed and just remove the bags when not flying over water.
one more advantage to apical floats on the astar is the mechanical pull system, no electrical system. apical also has the astar floats available with the liferaft built into the float bag, thereby freeing up cabin space.
dr
with regards to the extensions, have seen a number of operators keep the extension installed and just remove the bags when not flying over water.
one more advantage to apical floats on the astar is the mechanical pull system, no electrical system. apical also has the astar floats available with the liferaft built into the float bag, thereby freeing up cabin space.
dr