Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AS350 Astar / AS355 Twinstar [Archive Copy]

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AS350 Astar / AS355 Twinstar [Archive Copy]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2005, 17:34
  #421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,306
Received 553 Likes on 224 Posts
Could you provide the details from whence that grounding order comes.....Emergency AD's or something maybe?
SASless is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 17:46
  #422 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IS it all autopilots ?. ( 2 axis , 3 axis , coupled )
For the twins it would probably be more significant . I would guess that less than 5% of singles have autopilot .

Nothing on federal register .

Last edited by widgeon; 11th Jun 2005 at 17:58.
widgeon is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 17:54
  #423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
goose boy

Is this rumour or news?
Heliport is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:03
  #424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the world
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WIDGEON

As far as I know it is all.

SASLESS

I dont know the answer to that question.

HELIPORT

My source is from a very well know maintanaince company, I dont want to mention there names for obviouse reasons but the company begins with M.

Also I have had first hand dealings with a AS350 owner who is currently dealing with the situation.[
goose boy is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:09
  #425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,306
Received 553 Likes on 224 Posts
Heliport...I went to faa.gov and checked for AD's in both Emergency and Past 60 Days catagories and came up empty handed.
SASless is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:20
  #426 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,605
Received 466 Likes on 246 Posts
Seems a strange thing.

What has the check "A" got to do with weight and balance?

If it's a secret, it shouldn't be!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:29
  #427 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the world
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry When I say Check A it's more of a engineers check A ( totaly irelavant to a pilots check A)

More of a certificate of release to service for one day
goose boy is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:36
  #428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
goose boy

"very well know maintanaince company."
If your info is kosher, what's the problem about naming it?

You may be right - I don't know - but "AS350's Grounded Worldwide" is an eye-catching headline. You got the wrong end of the stick on another thread you started recently - and since removed.
I'd be much happier if we had a checkable source to confirm what Eurocopter has actually said.


Heliport

(I've changed your title for the moment, and will change it back if what you say is confirmed.)
Heliport is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:45
  #429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,306
Received 553 Likes on 224 Posts
I am from Missouri.....the "Show Me" state!

Heliport,

It would seem there would be lots of response to such a situation....here and other web sites.....but other than the original post....there seems to be no smoke signals from any fires showing.

But then....maybe there are not all that mamy 350/355 aircraft with autopilots out there to be affected.
SASless is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:46
  #430 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,605
Received 466 Likes on 246 Posts
Question

"Sorry When I say Check A it's more of a engineers check A ( totaly irelavant to a pilots check A)"

??

Is there a difference? There isn't on the aircraft type I fly and hold a check 'A' qualification for. We use the same checklist as the engineers.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 18:56
  #431 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

My sources tell me that it originated from a faxed warning from Eurocopter concerning a cracked vibration absorber. Requires checking daily by an engineer due to the need to take the belly panel off.

Last edited by Fortyodd; 11th Jun 2005 at 19:07.
Fortyodd is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 19:17
  #432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
news to me my company operates both and they where both flying today as where a number of other 350/355s.
CRAZYBROADSWORD is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 21:04
  #433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the belly panels had hartwell latches could the pilot carry out inspection ?. If i recall correctly if the panel can be removed and installed without the use of a tool then an engineer is not required, is this correct . If it is a cracked vib absorber then to me it sounds like an isolated installation problem , I recall the sfim/sagem system had one of the computers mounted adjacent to the vib absorber. Can't see how a W and B problem would cause damage to the vib absorbers .
widgeon is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2005, 12:10
  #434 (permalink)  

The Veloceraptor of Lounge Lizards
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: From here the view is lovely
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eurocopter issued an alert telex on 9th June to inspect the right hand cabin anti-vibration damper. The inspection has been included in our Daily Mandatory Inspections. All the pilot does is drop the right hand side of the belly panel to check the damper. If it breaks it could foul the trim actuator. Our engineers showed us in a few minutes what to look for. No fuss, no drama, no grounding.
verticalhold is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2005, 14:01
  #435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,306
Received 553 Likes on 224 Posts
VH....but if it breaks in flight then what? Possible for it to foul the control linkage and thus be a bit bothersome?
SASless is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2005, 16:16
  #436 (permalink)  

The Veloceraptor of Lounge Lizards
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: From here the view is lovely
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sasless;

You are absolutely right. Sorry, I meant no trouble about groundings or complex inspections. If it did break in flight it could cause a serious buttock clenching moment. I haven't heard if this fault has actually happened or whether someone has realised the possibilities and reacted accordingly, if so good on them.

VH
verticalhold is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2005, 16:30
  #437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,306
Received 553 Likes on 224 Posts
If this slight irregularity is of enough concern to require a daily visual inspection....one would assume the FAA, et al....would be issuing an Emergency AD on the issue. Another argument for operators to buy bare bones helicoters....see what happens when you add fancy avionics...nothing but extra costs and inspections!!!
SASless is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2005, 16:57
  #438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASless, you used to complain about barebones aircraft flogging around the patch at night, now you say that barebones aircraft are better (is that a gotcha?)
NickLappos is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2005, 17:15
  #439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,306
Received 553 Likes on 224 Posts
Nick,

Sorry old boy...that is not a gotcha....just another chorus of the same refrain.

I said....yet another excuse for operators to argue against buying the fancy kit....citing the increased costs of yet another inspection.

If the aircraft did not have the servo....and the chance of interference with it....would it be a "daily" visual inspection vice a periodic inspection as are a multitude of other things?

A question is begged here....did the engineers drop a clanger on this one by not anticipating the conflict?
SASless is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2005, 23:01
  #440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Just revising for my 355 OPC next week and the anti vibration resonator is not part of the autopilot. It just reduces vibration around the cabin floor area. The aircraft has to be checked once a day by a qualified engineer (not the crew) and details are available from macs
jayteeto is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.