Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Enstrom Down?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Enstrom Down?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2005, 12:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could this topic end up with those who fly the machines and have a vested interest in their own survival and the regulatory body who has other thoughts, at loggerheads with each other, as usual!
The only thing a fuel gauge tells you is that one is fitted. That was the advice of my instructor and it still holds true today.
Do instructors nowadays pass on these words of wisdom or are they so computer orientated that they believe what they see without question. Oh what a degradation of standards!
As equipment gets more reliable the standards of survivable thoughts deterioates. IMHO
Head Turner is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2005, 00:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alderney or Lancashire UK
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could this topic end up with those who fly the machines and have a vested interest in their own survival and the regulatory body who has other thoughts, at loggerheads with each other, as usual!
In a word, Yes.

I gave up trying to get approval to upgrade my instrumentation. Letters were not answered or lost and phone calls were pointless. They didn't want to know. Frightened of the consequences of actually making a decision I think.

In my opinion the regulators in this instance are not acting in the interest of safety.

I still don't run out of fuel but what the point in having instruments that are useless?? Its a known defect. It should be sorted out. This industry is supposed to be safety conscious.

Nicks right, but its a bit hard on a low hour pilot with a recently acquired machine. I remember asking about the fuel consumption on a 28A when I got mine. The usual answer was 'it depends'. And it does. anywhere from 12 to16 gallons per hour is normal full rich, depending on how the aircraft is set up. I can make it burn 18 gallons per hour if I really try hard! I can also get it down to 10. This knowledge only comes with experience, which Stuart did not have.

Remember, none of this is published in any of the documents available to the pilot either. Hence the need for decent information and instrumentation. It should not be too much to ask for.
Gaseous is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2005, 04:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: All Over Down Under
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silly Boy

I was always taught that 'He who lives by the gauge, dies by the gauge' Sounds lucky in the case of this accident anyway and I wish him a speedy recovery.
What ever happened to a second method of checking fuel on board ie, a fuel dipstick of some kind. Or a better knowledge of the aircrafts fuel flow and setting yourself for 15% reserve min or so on.
' He who lives by the gauge, dies by the gauge'
Heli Sport is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.