Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

All composite main rotor blade

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

All composite main rotor blade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2004, 21:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA (Naturalized but bits still British!)
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All composite main rotor blade

I have just read a claim (in a local newspaper) as to the "first composite main rotoblade" being introduced recently into service and was intrigued, I thought there have been full composite MRB's out in the world for a while now.

Any and all comments welcomed.

TTFN
PT6ER is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2004, 21:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Klaus Brunch at MBB may have other ideas .
I am not sure if the 105 or the Aerospat gazelle were the first although neither is all composite. I am certain that even the Carson Blade has the metallic cuff to atatch to the rotor head.

I think the claim is the first all composite blade for the S61 ( though not the Sea King as I think Westlands have retrofitted many). ( edited for spelling ).
widgeon is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2004, 22:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: south of France
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it was rotorhub and not rotor blade.
the full composites hubs exist in eurocopters since a few time..
thanks
zeeoo is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2004, 23:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bo 105



Sorry for the poor quality.

Dave J.
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 01:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First all-composite rotor blade for an S-61 made on a Thursday between 3 and 4 PM maybe?
NickLappos is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 02:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DAve , in my former life at Wastelands we paid lotsa dollars to MBB for tech data on their impregnation and lay up method , in the end they went the pre preg way . I think in the dim recesses of my memory I can recall the mixing ratio between the MY resin and HY hardener.
widgeon is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 05:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sussex, New Brunswick. Formerly Bowen Island B.C. Canada - one of the greatest places to live on Earth...
Posts: 196
Received 17 Likes on 4 Posts
Here is the story for the Carson Fire King from the local paper.

Maybe not the first, but certainly the latest.

WOW






And really in action with the Fire King!





Phil Kemp is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 09:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Harwich
Age: 65
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phil, what was the name of that company? I couldn't quite make it out from the photos.
Hilico is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 10:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,051
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those 61 blades look distinctly like the blades off an S76. Is that the case Nick?

I flew a completely composite Tail Rotor on a B47/ KH4 variant in Australia.
What an abortion of an idea.
Steve76 is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 15:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve76,

The planform seems identical!

The efficiency of the Carson blades (I think that is the name, I can't quite make it out from the photos......) is quite good, they are quite up to modern standards.

We use Figure of Merit to describe the amount of lift you get from the rotor as a percentage of the ideal lift from a perfect set of blades.

The best we have ever tested is about .80 (80% efficient) which is the standard for the next generation.

The Carson blades are about .78, as is the S-92.

The BERP blades on EH-101 are about .74 (not shabby for the early '80's when they were designed.) If the EH-101 had Carson/S-92 blades, it would lift almost 2,000 lbs more for the same power.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 15:39
  #11 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 431 Likes on 227 Posts
Angel

Hey Nick, be careful - don't leave yourself open to be accused of assisting the enemy!!

Or is it because you're feeling generous as it's nearly Christmas? Let me see now....Saint Nicholas Lap.....

Are you from Lap(pos)Land?

HOHoHo!!
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 15:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ShyTorque,

You must know that I speak my mind here! Were I to sell my soul and spout drivel, you lot would drum me out, and I wouldn't feel right, either.

Carson developed, built, tested and certified that blade himself, which is akin to the SpaceShip 1, in my humble opinion. It is a good blade, and is good for the S-61, I think.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 15:55
  #13 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 431 Likes on 227 Posts
Snoop

I agree!

But just so surprised you've now told those pesky EH101 folks how to improve their ship!

St Nick

+<(:-)>

ShyTorque is online now  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 16:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those Westlands guys are pretty sharp! They have known this for a decade, all they have waited for is some US Military dollars to do the job! That is what the Presidential fire-fight is all about. The VXX program is (by cost) 11% helicopter purchase of a few starter aircraft, and 89% development funds for the new blades/rotors/powerplants for the year 2014 delivery of the final design.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2004, 16:04
  #15 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 431 Likes on 227 Posts
fish

Oh well, maybe Carson (I think that's what they're called) might buy them for firefighting after it's all over......
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 00:44
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sussex, New Brunswick. Formerly Bowen Island B.C. Canada - one of the greatest places to live on Earth...
Posts: 196
Received 17 Likes on 4 Posts
fish

It is wonderful for the S-61.

Incredible performance increase throughout the envelope. Frank Carson and his team did a tremendous job of taking a fantastic concept blade and seeing the entire process through to delivery.

The pictures are of the first delivery of these blades to any customer outside Carson's own fleet. All we can say is WOW - bet you wish you had them too! After we took delivery we cruised back out to work, including a bit of experimentation up to 11,500 feet just to see how she does.

Absolutely fabulous!

Phil Kemp is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 02:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if the offshore people will buy them ?.
Was there not plans to offer the blades on lease.
widgeon is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 06:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: At home
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote " all they have waited for is some US Military dollars to do the job!"

Now there's a thing no other helo manufacturer would do. Just try to imagine it, having the tax-payer foot the bill for R & D of a military project, then using the technology to improve the bottom line on the civil side of the business. I just cannot see how they could sleep nights.

It would be rather like some company using a military machine as the basis for a civil helicopter. Wouldn't happen in the US!

Like, when we offer up a new type for POTUS we are talking NEW here, not bits copied from a military ship.

Whatever will those Europeans do next?

(Why? What'id I say?)
SawThe Light is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 12:59
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SawThe Light,

I think you saw the light! We are not talking about buying an off the shelf product. Imagine the British government pays a Russan organization billions to develop the next generation rotor blade for Britain, while the guys in Yeovil sit by and go on the dole.

Yep, you get the picture.

Last edited by NickLappos; 5th Dec 2004 at 14:47.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2004, 21:27
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: netherlands
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I could trace it, the BERP blades are designed by Westland as an improvement on the Lynx helicopters.

Actually all Lynx helocopters now are flying with the Compsite Main Rotor Blades (CMRB) rather than the old Metal Blades.

The logic step for Westland was to put those blades also on the EH-101.
bockywocky is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.