Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

B737-900 then what?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

B737-900 then what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2003, 18:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737-900 then what?

Just a curiosity.
What will the next B737 be called (if there will be one) after the B737-900 will there be a B737-1000?
Cheers
fonawah is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2003, 20:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 58
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

737-B52 I should think - if they stretch the 737 any more it'll be too long to rotate normally, so it'll need to go up ars* first like a B52!
Curious Pax is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2003, 21:18
  #3 (permalink)  

Press to Reset
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737-A00? Who said it had to be base ten anway

MC.
MasterCaution is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2003, 03:32
  #4 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
At the risk of being wrong, I believe that the 737 is limited in Europe to 189 seats, owing to the emergency exits. The -900 has the same number of seats as the -800, just more room for them. Any more seats requires re-certification, which would not be cost-effective.
Herod is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2003, 03:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -11`
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe it or not, but I`m told that KLM (already uses -300,-400,-800 and -900) is currently talking to Boeing about the 737-900X.
With a new type of overwing exit (bigger), that would allow more pax.
Rotating will be tricky, yes.
seat 0A is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2003, 03:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No they are going to make the gear longer.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2003, 03:56
  #7 (permalink)  

I'matightbastard
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737-A00? Who said it had to be base ten anway
So how long before it gets called the 737-A300?
Onan the Clumsy is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2003, 06:30
  #8 (permalink)  

bat fastard
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Back home in Alba
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seat 0A: Seriously? They would have to have more exits and bogied landing gear (moved back) and probably a new wing. You might aswell buy a 757-200.
G-ALAN is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2003, 06:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 737-900X would be dimensionally the same as the -900. They are proposing a range increase and 'sardine' seating to boost its capacity to 204 !

http://www.kingcountyjournal.com/sit...ry/html/128404
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2003, 15:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737-A320 ?????
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2003, 15:35
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for your replies
fonawah is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.