What sort of technical hitch would this be ?
Title? What title?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What sort of technical hitch would this be ?
Our childminder has just returned from a holiday in Gibralter and has been recounting what sounds like a very strange story. Apparently, they left Luton, got to within 10 minutes of Gibralter when the captain announced that there was a technical hitch and that they were returning to Luton. On arrival at Luton, they landed in what seems like a full scale emergency situation surrounded by fire engines etc. I guess my curiosity has been aroused as to what kind of 'technical' problem would make a 3 hour diversion the right decision (or is it possible that the technical' problem described by the captain is more a commercial imperative to avoid having a U/S aircraft layed up away from base ?)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
phnuff,
Happened "Loads" of times with "Various" airlines. A/c has a rather more than a "minor" prob. Can said a/c depart "safely"? if ANY doubt, a/c rtb pdq and a "reserve" [not necessarily] same co a/c does flight. Better 2-300 digruntled pax rather than xx hurt or worse.
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
Happened "Loads" of times with "Various" airlines. A/c has a rather more than a "minor" prob. Can said a/c depart "safely"? if ANY doubt, a/c rtb pdq and a "reserve" [not necessarily] same co a/c does flight. Better 2-300 digruntled pax rather than xx hurt or worse.
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
Title? What title?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry - yes indeed, Gib was the intended destination. Racking my poor little PPL brain, the only real thing I can think of was the plane with its return fuel load would be too heavy to land with what ever technical problem there was (undercarriage?). In that case it would make sense to return home (to base), and land with the lower load rather than jetisson fuel or hang around somewhere near spain for the load to reduce sufficently to take a more local alternate and still have passengers who could not get to their holiday.
Is this possible?.
Is this possible?.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm, stragne one that, maybe if it was a specific type of aircraft they wanted to return to their engineers so they didnt have a plane stranded out so far, the only reason i think is becasue a Q400 dash was starting at egns with an engine problem but the pilot was determinded to get over to bhx so he could get to his engineers.
Could be that?
Could be that?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
was this 2-3 weeks ago?
I remember working an aircraft through BARLU that came back after nearly getting to Gibralter.
If it was the same one, the reason I got was that there was a problem with the aircraft that could not be fixed at LXGB and would be a 'no dispatch' once they had landed - so they brought the plane back. Got no more details from pilot
I remember working an aircraft through BARLU that came back after nearly getting to Gibralter.
If it was the same one, the reason I got was that there was a problem with the aircraft that could not be fixed at LXGB and would be a 'no dispatch' once they had landed - so they brought the plane back. Got no more details from pilot
Title? What title?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was innthe last 10 days (no child minder = many problems so know exactly when she was away but not when she flew).
No despatch means ???
No despatch means ???
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Egcc
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Must have been a tankering sector which would account for the return fuel being onboard. Tankering is when it works out cheaper to load the fuel at your departure airfield for the roundtrip (or as much as you can get on bearing in mind MTOW, MLW etc etc) rather than just load return fuel at destination. Happens surprisingly often and is due to large fuel price differences between home and destination.
PP
As already mentioned a tech problem that would have stranded the aircraft would be the most likely reason to return to base. It's the lowest cost option.
PP
As already mentioned a tech problem that would have stranded the aircraft would be the most likely reason to return to base. It's the lowest cost option.
Title? What title?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just mentioned comments to childminder. Her response (as one of the 2-300 p****d off passengers) was along the lines of
I must admit, I see her point - delayed holiday, grumpy captain (apparently), and the only refreshments available have to be paid for, despite the fact that the airline is inconveniencing the passengers for its own commercial ends.
Still, they are all safe and I guess the tour company is going to have to face a deluge of complaints!
'if they can carry enough fuel to enable them to return to Luton to save the airline money, why the hell don't they carry enough tea and coffee to keep the passengers at least half way on their side'.
I must admit, I see her point - delayed holiday, grumpy captain (apparently), and the only refreshments available have to be paid for, despite the fact that the airline is inconveniencing the passengers for its own commercial ends.
Still, they are all safe and I guess the tour company is going to have to face a deluge of complaints!
