Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Bae 146/Avro RJ question

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Bae 146/Avro RJ question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th May 2003, 21:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the circuit
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bae 146/Avro RJ question

Hi,

Could someone give me an idea of the rate this aircraft burns fuel while taxying/holding on the ground.

Many thanks.

GB
Groundbased is offline  
Old 20th May 2003, 23:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hi.

The figures I have for ground operations are as follows:

All engines and APU running, engine anti-ice ON: 800kg/hr

All engines and APU running, engine anti-ice OFF: 600kg/hr

APU only, under load: 80kg/hr

Cheers.
redbug is offline  
Old 21st May 2003, 16:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Nightrider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The figures Redbug shows here are very correct. On small airports with about 10 minutes between start-up and lift-off a burn of 100kgs are sufficient, otherwise 200 kgs should be planned.
Only expected ground times of more than 17 minutes or winter operation need special attention in respect of "extra" taxi fuel.
 
Old 23rd May 2003, 07:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Dublin
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, only a dumbo ex hostie here, but I can remember a few years back at LCY the boys would always have 200 for taxi. There again we really didnt have far to taxi
Hostie from Hell is offline  
Old 24th May 2003, 18:00
  #5 (permalink)  
Nightrider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Now there may be several answers to this one...

1. The company may have decided that there is a minimum of 200 kgs of taxi fuel for all there operations....
2. The company may have decided that even with the necessity of 100 kgs only, the amount of 200 kgs is a safer way to operate as this will cater for unforseen delays....
3. The captains have decided to always use 200 kgs as a minimum as this provides a few minutes "pocket fuel" for unforseen inflight delays....
4. It is somehow common sense and backed up by any FOM, if the captain decides for some reasonable extra fuel, if he sees a reason to do so....
5. Sometimes the second-in-command has a valid point suggesting some fuel for the family at home....
6. Experience of recent operations into a particular place may show the demand to cater for some additional fuel....

The list can be continued for may other reasons, the given ones here only show a few which come to mind on first thought...
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.