Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Engines Smoking After Takeoff

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Engines Smoking After Takeoff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd May 2003, 22:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Engines Smoking After Takeoff

Hi,

I'm intrested to know why some aircraft's engines smoke after takeoff. What is this to do with?

A300 After Takeoff

B747-400 After Takeoff

MD-11 After Takeoff

Regards
BAe 146-100
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Old 4th May 2003, 03:00
  #2 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,163
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Since it is quiet in here on a Saturday evening, a non-expert reply!

This is unburnt fuel. In the same way that you may see a car with a slightly smoking exhaust. If you REALLY want to see smoke, watch a B52 departing and you will see why it is said that they are coal fired.

The reason, as far as I know, is that the engine is working at (or near) maximum and is unable to use all of the fuel BUT that the balance between pumping in enough 'go juice' and not quite enough is a fine balance. It is affected by the actual take off weight of the machine, temperature of air at the intake, and a number of other factors. The error is always on the side of enough fuel rather than the 'not quite enough fuel'!

Right, now let me sit back and be shot down in flames. Or would that be shot down in smoke?
PAXboy is offline  
Old 4th May 2003, 03:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at a B737/200, B727, TU154 on LANDING, never mind t/o
I once [in the '70's] watched a "Vulcan Scramble" The runway was "IMC" for a couple of mins Triffick
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
chiglet is offline  
Old 4th May 2003, 16:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,373
Received 100 Likes on 42 Posts
Different grades of Jet fuel

It's interesting that that two of the photo's above show North American operators. Here in Europe we use Jet A1 whereas in the USA it's Jet A. The main difference for airline operations is the respective freeze points (-47 C for A1 and -40 C for A) but a side effect is the visible smoke generated by so called "wide cut" fuels such as A. An even better example is the military equivalent used by US forces called JP5. Not only is this very smokey it is prohibited in civil use............
ETOPS is offline  
Old 5th May 2003, 08:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ipswich Australia
Age: 66
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
smoking

I live in manchester and you can see the Tu 154 coming miles away smoking to land its interesting to know of the different fuels i did not know about i thought it was old technology obviously not.
VS-075 is offline  
Old 5th May 2003, 14:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They don't make 'em like this anymore

707 Takeoff
Landing 707
ramsrc is offline  
Old 5th May 2003, 18:19
  #7 (permalink)  
Death Cruiser Flight Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vaucluse, France.
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The Convair 990 was a smokey old bird, until they modified the combustion chambers, which improved it a lot.
One of Britannia's 737-200s flew around for a long time with a very smokey engine on one side and a very clean one on the other. Weird.
Georgeablelovehowindia is offline  
Old 5th May 2003, 19:41
  #8 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,163
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
ETOPS, thanks for the detail of the fuels. Do you know why the JP5 is not permitted for civilian use and what benefits does it bring the air force?

Also, as engines may produce smoke on approach, my suggestion (above) appears to be wrong. I had thought that the engines working at max might smoke on departure but not in the cruise. Is the anti-ice component the main reason for smoke?

Thanks.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 5th May 2003, 20:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,373
Received 100 Likes on 42 Posts
JP 5 has a higher flash point than civil Jet A/A1 thus can ignite more easily. The selling point of Jet A1 is you can drop a lighted match in a pool of it without causing a blast. Don't try that with JP 5..............
ETOPS is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 01:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was it Lord Brabazon who said to his US "opposite number"
I will stand in a pool of JP1? and you stand in a pool of JP4? and we will drop lighted matches. Needless to say, it wasn't taken up
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
[I cannot remember the designations in use at the time, sorreeee
chiglet is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 02:53
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

Thanks for your reply's .

Regards
BAe 146-100
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 03:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
Age: 77
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The engines may smoke but the passengers may not.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 12:05
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Post

As I understand it, jet A and jet A1 are NOT wide cut fuels. JP4 is the wide cut fuel. Wide cut means a larger number of the fractions of oil distillation. This is what makes JP4 lethal to handle. At room temperatures in an open container, jet A is too lean to burn, avgas is too rich and JP4 is just right. I have watched the old demo - toss a cigarette butt into a can of jet A and avgas no problems, but I've never met any survivors using JP4. It certainly impresses the apprentices when someone flicks a butt into a can of fuel!!!
mustafagander is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 18:14
  #14 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,163
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
How interesting. Now for a silly question ...

Why to the Americans use a different fuel to Europeans? Is the freeze point the only diff?

For the military, is it due to the engines functioning in a very different manner? Is the 'tuning' (in layman terms) of the engine that much different?

Thanks.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 18:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cost JP4 is cheaper
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
chiglet is offline  
Old 7th May 2003, 01:25
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

More likely to be burnt oil.
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 8th May 2003, 18:58
  #17 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,163
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Ah, interesting. So, if it is oil, why just during depart/arrive? I think it is rare to see smoking engines in the cruise?
PAXboy is offline  
Old 8th May 2003, 19:09
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Around the world.
Age: 42
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A touch off topic, but: After engine start do you leave the PACKs turned off for a while to allow any smoke to clear before turning them on – saving pumping the aircraft full of nasty fumes?? (e.g. if you have a tail-wind on start-up blowing smoke forward allowing it into the engine inlet)
cheers..
tom775257 is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 02:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 161 Likes on 102 Posts
Maybe one or two other 'wrinklies' remember the tale of the Pan Am 707 taking off at LHR in front of a (then) BOAC Comet. The 707 departed in its usual smoke cloud and the Comet requested an IFR take-off. The Pan Am response was "Son, when you grow up, you'll be allowed to smoke, too"
Cornish Jack is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.