Descent in the holding pattern
Cool as a moosp
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mostly Hong Kong
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Descent in the holding pattern
For you Authorised Examiners/Check Airmen/ATC Standards guys out there, or you wizard dudes at Jepperson who eat this stuff for breakfast.
A point of PansOps came up today about the height to which you may descend on entry to a holding pattern. If the holding pattern has a minimum altitude specified of say 2000 feet, may you descend to that altitude during the entry procedure or do you have to wait until you are established in the hold after the entry procedure? (i.e. after the first station passage for a Sector 3 entry or after the second station passage after a Sector 1 or 2 entry.)
All I can read out of PansOps Vol 1 Part IV holding procedures implies that you can descend to the minimum holding altitude in the entry procedure, but I have a dissenter who believes that you must be "Established" in the hold.
Any ideas?
And BTW I do get out a bit, but probably not enough...
.
A point of PansOps came up today about the height to which you may descend on entry to a holding pattern. If the holding pattern has a minimum altitude specified of say 2000 feet, may you descend to that altitude during the entry procedure or do you have to wait until you are established in the hold after the entry procedure? (i.e. after the first station passage for a Sector 3 entry or after the second station passage after a Sector 1 or 2 entry.)
All I can read out of PansOps Vol 1 Part IV holding procedures implies that you can descend to the minimum holding altitude in the entry procedure, but I have a dissenter who believes that you must be "Established" in the hold.
Any ideas?
And BTW I do get out a bit, but probably not enough...
.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The join is designed to keep you in the holding protected area just like the hold pattern proper, so you may descend to minimum holding altitude once there (if so cleared by atc). You may also go straight into the procedural approach from the join without flying a full pattern - the join and the hold are the same. That's how I understand it.....
I'd be stuck if I had to quote you a reference, though. I'll have a look around and get back to you if I find one..... (don't hold your breath!! )
I'd be stuck if I had to quote you a reference, though. I'll have a look around and get back to you if I find one..... (don't hold your breath!! )
Cool as a moosp
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mostly Hong Kong
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the quick replies. That's what I think too so it is useful to have a bit of amunition when you are arguing a point. I'll try the Jeppersen "Introduction" for a reference when I'm near a copy.
Cheers
Cheers
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
moosp
Found the reference: PANS-OPS (Doc 8168-OPS/611) Vol 1 (Flight Procedures) Part IV - Chapter 2 Obstacle Clearance (page 4-9).
(It goes on to define buffer areas, minimum holding levels and the clearance from obstacles afforded by these concepts.....)
2.1 Holding Area.
The holding area includes the basic holding area and the entry area:
a) the basic holding area at any particular level is the airspace required at that level to encompass a holding pattern based on the allowances for aircraft speed, wind effect, timing errors, holding fix characteristics, etc.;
b)the entry area includes the airspace required to accomodate the specified entry procedures.
The holding area includes the basic holding area and the entry area:
a) the basic holding area at any particular level is the airspace required at that level to encompass a holding pattern based on the allowances for aircraft speed, wind effect, timing errors, holding fix characteristics, etc.;
b)the entry area includes the airspace required to accomodate the specified entry procedures.