Alternate airport scenario
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alternate airport scenario
When filling in a flight plan and the alternate airport is nominated, I assume this is incase the weather at the original destination is poor. Is there ever a scenario where you are flying to a remote airport/airfield and the alternate airport is too far away? what would you do then? Would you have to ensure you had enough fuel to get there?
Also what if the weather at the alternate airport is also bad?
Sorry that's about three questions in one!!! Any help greatly appreciated.
Also what if the weather at the alternate airport is also bad?
Sorry that's about three questions in one!!! Any help greatly appreciated.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the past with some of the more remote destinations in the pacific, under FAA regulations an "island reserve" fuel could be carried if no alternate was available. This island reserve fuel was two hours at normal all-engines cruise speed. for four engine aircraft.
This did not apply to twins because ETOPS was not then available.
So far as I know, this island reserve fuel requirement is still in the regulations. PanAmerican used this procedure quite a lot years ago with the B707.
This did not apply to twins because ETOPS was not then available.
So far as I know, this island reserve fuel requirement is still in the regulations. PanAmerican used this procedure quite a lot years ago with the B707.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 5 km from ESGG
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JAR-OPS specifies an "Isolated Aerodrome Procedure" for fuel calculations which amounts to more or less what 411 describes. You must have fuel for 2 hours flying over the destination if there is no alternate available.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seem to recall being told by the boss that we were carrying "2 Hour Island Reserve" fuel when operating SIN-PER on a 767 - is this what he was referring to? (I'm only Cabin Crew so that's why I'm not sure) - Surely there must be some strip of concrete around PER that can be used to divert if no other choice?
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: the watch list
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fonawah , I think we've lost the basics here.
Flying IFR you must have an alternate (except in a few special cases, yes I know).
If the weather at either the destination or alternate is to poor you need an extra alternate that does comply with the planning minimums.
The alternate can't be "too far away" because than it doesn't serve you as a usable alternate. This is where the discussion about flying with aircrafts with limited range come in.
Flying IFR you must have an alternate (except in a few special cases, yes I know).
If the weather at either the destination or alternate is to poor you need an extra alternate that does comply with the planning minimums.
The alternate can't be "too far away" because than it doesn't serve you as a usable alternate. This is where the discussion about flying with aircrafts with limited range come in.
