Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Bombardier CS300 vs A320

Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Bombardier CS300 vs A320

Old 12th Jul 2017, 00:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Hawaiian Nebula
Posts: 17
Bombardier CS300 vs A320

The CS300 appears to be quite an impressive aircraft with a positive outlook regarding orders worldwide, including BA (LCY), Korean Air, Delta, Air Canada, etc. Whereas the A320 just seems old, outdated when compared to the C-Series.

Which aircraft would you choose to fly if presented with the option?

Last edited by 3RDi; 12th Jul 2017 at 01:20.
3RDi is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2017, 02:06
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 794
Whichever one paid more.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2017, 04:04
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 3,904
What Amadis said. In the end it is just another aircraft.

Would i like to try it? Sure, but in the end quality of life and pay do make the difference, not the office.

Besides, if you consider orders and therefore the possible number of employers the A320 wins hands down, its not even a real comparison.
Denti is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2018, 13:01
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Hawaiian Nebula
Posts: 17
Made the right choice!
3RDi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.