Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Apu use on ground

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd May 2016, 22:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apu use on ground

Hi, I have just a simple question for all pilots as a spectator.
On ground, in the airports where there's no particular restrictions I see the APU start (even with GPU and normal temperature) follows no rule. Somebody starts before boarding, others 20 mins or later.
When do you usually start? Do you look at the time and eobt or just start when see pax boarding?
I read fuel for APU is included in the flight plan, how much fuel for apu use is included in the OFP?

Cheers
I-WEBA is offline  
Old 2nd May 2016, 23:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,496
Received 159 Likes on 85 Posts
Airline and airport policy dictate.
If there is no preconditioned air available then the cabin will get uncomfortably warm pretty quickly once boarding starts. Some look after the pax some don't give a Damn as long as it saves fuel and wear and tear on the APU.
TURIN is online now  
Old 3rd May 2016, 17:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Usually when the crew want hot water for a brew
750XL is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 23:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also nice to consider ground staff in your decision. It's damn noisy for them if you run the APU while they're packing your aircraft.
172_driver is offline  
Old 4th May 2016, 01:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Normally only used for air conditioning for us on the Dash-8, but we try and wait until the fuel truck is gone before starting as the jet efflux is damn near right where they park the truck...plus, as someone else mentioned, its very loud.

As for fuel burn, our APUs are planned at 150 pounds per hour - not sure about the bigger iron, but I can't imagine it would be that much more.
+TSRA is offline  
Old 4th May 2016, 03:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
We plan 300 kg an hour so it's more.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 4th May 2016, 14:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:everything is simply bigger in Texas
de facto is offline  
Old 4th May 2016, 18:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300 kg an hour
Damn near as much as a PT6...makes sense I guess considering how big those APUs get for heavy metal.
+TSRA is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 00:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We use it on the ground (for the Dash) mainly to keep airflow in the cabin, which can get very stuffy even on a cold day if you've got 70 odd passengers on board.

Also, we have pushback starts at our main ports, so require APU on for engine start on pushback.

IMHO, noise on the ramp should never be a consideration for NOT using the APU if you require it. Ramp staff should be wearing PPE.
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 18:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO, noise on the ramp should never be a consideration for NOT using the APU if you require it. Ramp staff should be wearing PPE.
I could be wrong here, but I believe in CPH the loaders won't even touch your aircraft till the APU is off?
750XL is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 21:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're really fussy in CPH! And they let you know in typical Danish style..
172_driver is offline  
Old 8th May 2016, 04:35
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've only ever operated in Australia (maybe should have said that earlier).

Having said that (and have never been to CPH so I don't know what other traffic there is) what do the loaders do when an A330 taxis past?

DIVOSH!
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 8th May 2016, 11:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CPH loaders have long been rather bolshie on this, the precious little flowers. It wouldn't be so bad if they were as quick to plug in the conditioning air as they are to get snotty about an APU running, and if your company don't or won't pay for it the "quiet" policy quickly produces a sweatbath or worse, in winter with doors open an icebath on board. Perhaps pilots should reciprocate the bolshiness? As with so much scandawegian idealism it may be a nice idea but it has major flaws in practice.
Having said that CPH is an eerily quiet place because of it.
Wageslave is offline  
Old 9th May 2016, 07:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And in the UK I must turn on the APU as ground crew won't approach the aircraft with anti-collision on. Somehow, in all other places it can be done safely? Different places, different cultures. The Danes have their flaws, but at least they're standing upright and tell you what they think.

I wasn't saying ground crew should be the only ones in consideration.
172_driver is offline  
Old 9th May 2016, 10:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Damn near as much as a PT6...makes sense I guess considering how big those APUs get for heavy metal.
Most widebody APUs share their basic cores with other turboprop and small biz jet engines so the fuel burn is going to be much the same.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 9th May 2016, 13:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ground crew won't approach the aircraft with anti-collision on

You'll find the same attitude here in Canada. Anti-collision on is the standard "I'm about to start my engines." An old company of mine who operated almost exclusively in the arctic found that out the hard way while running the APU in Edmonton one day. No one approached us until us rednecks went to go ask where the southern hospitality was. Turned the light off and we were surrounded.
+TSRA is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 05:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
172_driver

I wasn't saying ground crew should be the only ones in consideration.
In my airline we only board using the front door of the dash, so the APU noise is pretty insignificant for any passengers. There is nobody else on the ramp who wouldn't have PPE.

I can only write from the perspective of an Australian pilot who flies the Dash, so please don't take this as me arguing with you.


DIVOSH!
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2016, 22:57
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see in many airports there are restrictions such as 5mins before ETD. If I arrive on block, from the previous inbound flight, 5 mins late, I have to update my ETD and also the APU start in case?

For instance scheduled in block time 19.00 , scheduled departure time 19.35
On time I could start the APU at 19.30... Today I'm 5mins late, so actual in block time 19.05, will my EOBT be 19.40 and so the APU should be started not before 19.35?
I-WEBA is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2016, 23:19
  #19 (permalink)  

OLD RED DAMASK
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
Age: 70
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SFO has a ban on APU's until departure, supposedly to do with being environmentally friendly. However with V8 gas guzzlers going up and down 101 next to the airport, I think it a bit stupid.
lasernigel is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2016, 13:59
  #20 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lasernigel:

SFO has a ban on APU's until departure, supposedly to do with being environmentally friendly. However with V8 gas guzzlers going up and down 101 next to the airport, I think it a bit stupid.
I thought everyone in San Francisco drives either a Prius or a Tesla. In that way they transfer the pollution to out-of-area power plants.
aterpster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.